Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Trials
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Trials
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to the Editor
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJN_308_2025

Allograft Function and Baseline Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients: One Size Doesn’t Fit All

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medicine Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Division of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States

Corresponding author: Kalathil K Sureshkumar, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medicine Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. E mail: kalathil.sureshkumar@ahn.org

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sureshkumar KK, Conant AN, Chopra B. Allograft Function and Baseline Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients: One Size Doesn’t Fit All. Indian J Nephrol. doi: 10.25259/IJN_308_2025

Dear Editor,

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) predicts acute rejection in kidney allografts.1-3 Cellular senescence and injury constantly release cfDNA fragments into circulation. DNA fragments are cleared from the blood by the kidneys and liver with a half-life of ∼30 minutes.4 It is unclear whether reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) would result in higher baseline dd-cfDNA values. Variations in baseline dd-cfDNA at different eGFRs in stable KTRs were explored in the current study.

We identified KTRs between September 2017 and June 2020 who had dd-cfDNA levels (AlloSure, CareDx, Brisbane, CA) at or around 8 weeks post-transplantation. A dd-cfDNA value ≥ 1% prompted allograft biopsy. KTRs with biopsy evidence for rejection or other injuries were excluded. Patients were divided based on MDRD equation-based eGFR using 8-week serum creatinine (<30, 30-59, and ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2). Baseline 8-week dd-cfDNA levels were compared between different eGFR groups using t-test.

Among 156 patients, 36 with biopsy-proven rejection were excluded from the analysis. The remaining 120 (40 living and 80 deceased donor KTRs) were stratified based on eGFR as follows: <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (n=18), 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2 (n=72), ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 (n=30). Baseline 8-week dd-cfDNA values were significantly higher in groups with eGFR <30 vs. ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 (0.74±0.65 vs. 0.25±0.12, p=0.005); <30 vs. 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2 (0.74±0.65 vs. 0.38±0.34, p=0.03) and 30-59 vs. ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 (0.38±0.34 vs. 0.25±0.12, p=0.004). There was a significant linear correlation between dd-cfDNA levels and eGFR, as shown in Figure 1.

Relationship between baseline dd-cfDNA and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Blue squares represent individual dd-cfDNA values. Black line represents correlation between dd-cfDNA values and GFR. dd-cfDNA: Donor derived cell free DNA.
Figure 1:
Relationship between baseline dd-cfDNA and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Blue squares represent individual dd-cfDNA values. Black line represents correlation between dd-cfDNA values and GFR. dd-cfDNA: Donor derived cell free DNA.

We found a significant correlation between baseline dd-cfDNA levels and eGFR. Decreasing renal clearance of DNA fragments and possibly higher levels of intra-graft inflammation with declining GFR are plausible explanations.5 These observations point towards the possible need for stratifying baseline dd-cfDNA based on the level of allograft function.

Acknowledgement

Presented virtually as a poster at American Transplant Congress 2021.

Financial support and sponsorship

Dr. Kalathil Sureshkumar and Dr. Bhavna Chopra received research grant from CareDx.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Validation of a clinical-grade assay to measure donor-derived cell-free DNA in solid organ transplant recipients. J Mol Diagn. 2016;18:890-902.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Cell-free DNA and active rejection in kidney allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2221-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft rejection. Nat Med. 2024;30:2320-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Rapid clearance of fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:218-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Contribution of diminished kidney transplant GFR to increased circulating chemokine ligand 27 level. J Inflamm (Lond). 2018;15:18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
148

PDF downloads
863
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections