Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:849

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (576 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Patients and Methods
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1023    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 29    

Recommend this journal


  Table of Contents  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 30-36

Clinico-microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in South India

Department of Nephro-Urology, M. S. Ramaiah Hospital, MSRIT Post, New BEL Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication25-Mar-2011

Correspondence Address:
P Kempegowda
No. 28/18, 19th Main Road, M. C. Layout, Vijaynagar, Bangalore - 560 040, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.75226

Rights and Permissions


The knowledge of etiology and antibiotic resistance pattern of the organisms causing urinary tract infection is essential. This study was taken up to determine the presentation and risk factors associated with community-acquired urinary tract infection (CA-UTI). The distribution of bacterial strains isolated from these patients and their resistance pattern were also studied. This multidisciplinary prospective observational study was conducted in M. S. Ramaiah Hospital, Bangalore, between January and December, 2008. Patients who had CA-UTI confirmed by positive urine culture reports were included in the study. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS version 16. Symptomatology and others risk factors for CA-UTI were studied in these patients and the causative organisms and their resistance patterns were recorded. Of the total 510 patients included, 57% belonged to the elderly age group (50-79 years). Fever and dysuria were the most common clinical presentation, but were not specific in predicting CA-UTI. Escherichia coli (66.9%) was the most common organism causing CA-UTIs with extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance seen in nearly two-thirds of these cases (42.2%). The organisms recorded least resistance against carbapenems (3.9%). A high resistance rate was seen for fluoroquinolones (74.1%). In conclusion, a high rate of ESBL-positive organisms and their resistance to commonly used antibiotics brings a concern for future options in treating these conditions.

Keywords: Community-acquired urinary tract infection, extended spectrum beta lactamase, antibiotic resistance

How to cite this article:
Eshwarappa M, Dosegowda R, Aprameya I V, Khan M W, Kumar P S, Kempegowda P. Clinico-microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in South India. Indian J Nephrol 2011;21:30-6

How to cite this URL:
Eshwarappa M, Dosegowda R, Aprameya I V, Khan M W, Kumar P S, Kempegowda P. Clinico-microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in South India. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2023 Feb 5];21:30-6. Available from:

  Introduction Top

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases seen in the community. [1] Empirical antibiotic therapy is usually applied here and for this, knowledge of the common uropathogens and their susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics is needed. Treatment becomes even more challenging in the presence of risk factors such as higher age, comorbidity, and immunosupression. Many times, physicians resort to prescribing broad-spectrum antibiotics over specific antibiotics in the view of resistance of the causative organism to the antibiotic. Poor patient compliance and incomplete course of antibiotic therapy have resulted in the evolution of resistance to many of these antibiotics. Various studies done worldwide have shown changing patterns in the etiology of UTIs. [2],[3] However, studies on UTI and the pattern of antibiotic resistance in India are few. [4],[5] The present trends of the uropathogens and their susceptibility to various antibiotics are essential to formulate guidelines for the empirical treatment of UTIs while awaiting the culture sensitivity.

The aim of the present study was to record the common clinical presentation and risk factors for UTI. The distribution of bacterial strains isolated from complicated and uncomplicated UTIs occurring in the community and their resistance pattern against commonly used antibiotics at our setting were also studied.

  Patients and Methods Top

The study was done in M. S. Ramaiah Memorial Hospital, Bangalore, from January to December, 2008. The study included all the patients who were admitted or visited the out-patient department in the hospital with symptoms of UTI during the study period and had UTI confirmed by positive urine culture reports. Only one sample from each subject was considered. Subjects with clinical symptoms of UTI but samples not grown on any organism were excluded from final analysis. Patients who underwent treatment with another antimicrobial within 48 h or within 24 h if only a single dose and in the presence of an appropriate positive culture and ileal loops or vesicoureteral reflux were also excluded from the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire regarding demographic and clinical data. The subjects were classified as having complicated UTI based on the criteria defined by Rubenstein and Schaeffer [Table 1]. [6]
Table 1 :Identification of patients with complicated urinary tract infections[5]

Click here to view

Isolation and identification of uropathogens

A clean-catch midstream specimen or suprapubic aspirate, in subjects who were unable to give the former, was collected in a sterile wide-mouth leak-proof container to hold about 50 ml specimen. Using a calibrated loop method of a loop diameter of 4 mm, 10 μl of the uncentrifuged specimen was transferred onto the agar plate and streak using the modified Mayo's technique without flaming the loop for isolation and incubated at 35-37°C for 24 h. A specimen was considered positive for UTI if a single organism was cultured at a concentration of >105 colony-forming units/ml. The Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms were culture isolates which were further identified by using various biochemical reactions up to genus/species levels wherever applicable.

Antibiotic sensitivity testing

In the presence of any potential growth, antibiotic sensitivity testing was done by the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. [7] The antibiotics tested were imepenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, and cotrimoxazole (Pathoteq Labs, India).

Extended spectrum beta lactamase detection

The screening for extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) was done using cefpodoxime (≤17 mm), ceftazidime (≤22 mm), aztreonam (≤27 mm), cefotaxime (≤27 mm), and ceftriaxone (≤25 mm). If the organisms showed a zone of inhibition lower than the minimum for any antibiotic disc, ESBL positivity was suspected. The phenotypic confirmation was done by testing the strain against ceftazidime (Ca) and ceftazidime/clavulanic acid. A >5-mm diameter of the zone of inhibition for ceftazidime/clavulanic acid in comparison to ceftazidime was considered indicative of ESBL production.  Escherichia More Details coli ATCC 25922 was used as an ESBL-negative and Klebsiella pneumoniae 700603 was used as an ESBL-positive reference strain. [7]

Management of UTI

All hemodynamically stable patients with UTI were started on oral fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins. Hemodynamically unstable patients were started on third-generation cephalosporins parenterally. If the symptoms did not subside over next 72 h and the culture showed ESBL-positive organisms, then these patients were started on parenteral carbapenem therapy. All patients received antibiotic therapy for 7 days. If fever persisted after 7 days, antibiotic therapy was continued for 48 h after fever subsided.

Statistical analysis

The analysis was done using the statistical software package SPSS version 16. Age, gender, organisms causing UTI, their antibiotic sensitivity and resistance, symptomatology of these patients and risk factors for UTI were included as variables in the model.

  Results Top

Overall, 5564 subjects suspected to have UTI were screened. Of these, 510 patients showed growth on the urine culture and were included in the study [Table 2]. The mean age was 52.84±22.25 years. Most of the cases were recorded in the elderly age group (50-79 years, 57.4%). Pediatric cases comprised 9.8% of the total cases. The mean age of complicated UTI patients was 55.47±21.51 years (95% CI 53.50-57.45 years) and was 29.69±13.76 years (95% CI 25.87-33.52 years) for uncomplicated UTI. As males were categorized as complicated cases, all 52 uncomplicated cases were females. In complicated UTI, the female:male ratio was 1:1.63.
Table 2 :Age- and gender-wise distribution of complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infection

Click here to view

Fever and dysuria were the most common clinical presentation of the patients in UTI, overall as well as individually in complicated and uncomplicated UTI [Figure 1]. Diabetes (42.6%) was the most common factor associated with complicated UTI in our study. While the recent history of urogenital instrumentation (TURP, cystoscopy, stenting) other than catheterization was present in 16.2% of the study subjects, catheterization alone posed a significant risk factor seen in 11.4% of them [Table 3].
Table 3 :Frequency of risk factors in subjects with urinary tract infection

Click here to view
Figure 1 :Various symptomatologies seen in patients with UTI during the initial presentation. Fever and dysuria were the most common presenting symptoms in the present study

Click here to view

ESBL-positive E. coli (42.2%), ESBL-negative E. coli (24.7%), ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae (9.6%), ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae (5.9%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.2%) were the most prevalent microorganisms in UTI patients [Table 4]. The frequency and distribution of the UTI pathogens were similar in complicated and uncomplicated UTI. ESBL-positive E. coli (43.9%) was the most common causative organism in complicated cases, while ESBL-negative E. coli was found in 50% of uncomplicated cases.
Table 4 :Frequency and distribution pattern of pathogens and percentage of ESBL production

Click here to view

The antimicrobial potency and spectrum for nine selected antimicrobial agents of different classes against the UTI pathogens recorded in the study are summarized in [Table 5]. Carbapenems had the least resistance (3.9%), followed by amikacin (28.0%), and nitrofurantoin (28.6%). A high rate of resistance was recorded against quinolones (74.1%). The antibiotic resistance pattern in complicated UTI was similar to that in overall infection with carbapenems having the least resistance (4.1%), followed by amikacin (29.0%) and nitrofurantoin (31.2%). However, organisms in uncomplicated UTI showed lesser resistance toward nitrofurantoin (5.8%).The mortality associated with CA-UTI in the present study was 8.4%. The mortality in patients having ESBL-positive UTI was 9.8%.
Table 5 :Resistance pattern of the uropathogens to various antibiotics

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

Although UTI ranks among the most common infection in developing countries, in the present study, only 510 of the 5564 suspected cases (9.17%) were proved by culture. This indicates that urine culture is essential for a definitive diagnosis of UTI. The low culture positivity rate in the present study could be partly explained by nonspecific symptoms such as fever and pain abdomen. We found that the presence of combinations of these symptoms has a better chance to be UTI rather than the lone symptoms.

Increased frequency was the most common symptom among acute uncomplicated UTI in a study done by Little et al. [8] Sepahi et al. [9] found that fever, pain, irritability, dysuria, and hematuria were the main clinical presentation of UTI in the presence of urolithiasis in children. Similar clinical symptomatology was seen in the present study. But the predictability of UTI by these symptoms is to be questioned. Individually, none of the symptoms were potent enough to pick up most of the UTI. When two or more symptoms were taken in combination, their predictability was still very low (fever and dyuria 11.4%, fever and pollakiuria 2.2%). The presence of a risk factor (complicated UTI) marginally improved the predictability of these symptoms to diagnose UTI (diabetes and fever 7.1%, diabetes and dysuria 12.2%, diabetes, fever, and dysuria 1.6%). These findings indicate that clinical presentation plays a very minor role, if any, in diagnosing UTI, reconfirming the fact that urine culture is essential to diagnose UTI.

Diabetes mellitus has a number of long-term effects on the genitourinary system. Diabetic nephropathy is one of the many factors that make these patients more susceptible to UTI than nondiabetics. Reduced immunity in diabetes also contributes to the increased risk for acquiring UTI. A range of infrequent presentations of complicated UTI such as emphysematous pyelonephritis and emphysematous pyelitis are commonly seen in patients with diabetes. Because of their predisposity to these uncommon presentations, there are recommendations for including plain radiograph and ultrasonography of abdomen while investigating UTI to look for upper urinary tract involvement. [10]

For either short- or long-term catheters, the infection rate is about 5% per day. [11] Infection spreads by biofilm formation on both internal (intraluminal route) and external (periurethral route) catheter surface. Despite precautions, the majority of patients catheterized for >2 weeks eventually develop bacteriuria. [12] Asymptomatic bacteriuria is the most common presentation of catheter-associated UTI. Current recommendations are not to treat asymptomatic catheter-associated UTI as it leads to the emergence of drug-resistant organisms. [11] To prevent infection, intermittent catheterization by either a nurse or by the patient is advised. [12]

The uropathogen profile in our study is similar to other studies. [4],[5],[13],[14] Contradicting findings have been reported regarding the uropathogens' profile and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns in the presence of diabetes. While Stapleton [15] found that the organisms causing UTI in diabetic patients are significantly different than those in nondiabetics, Bonadio et al. [16] reported that diabetes made no difference to the uropathogen profile or the antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Similar results were seen in the present study.

Kader et al. reported 8.9% ESBL-positive cases in a hospital-based study in Saudi Arabia. [17] Bean et al. reported a community-based ESBL prevalence to be 5.7% in London. [18] In the present study, 52.2% of the isolates were ESBL-positive uropathogens. Previous studies in India have reported an ESBL positivity rate between 26.9% and 48.3%. [4],[5],[19],[20] ESBL producers do not respond to the usually prescribed empirical therapy. Also, there is an increased risk of associated morbidity and mortality, and cost of therapy when these patients are put on the standard empirical therapy. [21] Presently, alternative antimicrobial therapy to treat ESBL-positive UTI on outpatient basis is limited. Carbapenems are the most effective in this situation [22] but need to be administered intra-venously or -amuscularly. The experimental use of fosfomycin in treating ESBL-positive UTI has also shown promising results in the recent past. [23],[24] All this and the high rate of ESBL positivity in the present study warrant a change in the empirical therapy for UTI to prevent the complications.

The antibiotic susceptibility pattern in the present study is similar to other studies. [25],[26],[27],[28],[29] Quinolones were the least active drug against uropathogens in the present study. The resistance rate for ciprofloxacin has been increasing over decades and this is the highest resistance rate reported to date. Akram et al. [4] reported ciprofloxacin resistance rates ranging from 47% to 69% among the Gram-negative organisms in their study in India. Though the bacterial spectrum causing community-acquired UTI (CA-UTI) remained the same over time, the antibiotic susceptibility has changed. Prais et al. [30] studied bacterial susceptibility to oral antibiotics in CA-UTI in 1991 and 1999. They reported that the pathogens recovered in the two groups were similar but there was a generalized decrease in bacterial susceptibility to common antibiotics in the two groups. Although, quinolones were considered as one of the drugs of choice for the treatment of UTI, the increasing resistance rate necessitates a change in the empirical treatment against CA-UTI.

The uropathogens showed highest sensitivity to carbapenems. The next best alternatives were aminoglycosides. But again, nearly one-third and more than half of the uropathogens showed resistance against amikacin and gentamicin, respectively. Also, the carbapenem-resistant organisms, although only a few in the present study, raise a concern over the available options to treat complicated and drug-resistant cases. Until recently, carbapenems were almost uniformly active against resistant Gram-negative organisms, but some strains have now developed very effective ways to deal with the carbapenems. There are various mechanisms by which these organisms achieve such feat, by producing beta lactamases which destroy the antibiotics, by blocking the entry of these antibiotics, or by efflux pumps which actively pump out these antibiotics. [31] Furthermore, some of these mechanisms are not antibiotic or class specific, and can also be easily transferred from one organism to another. The situation is worsening everyday as no new antibiotics against these multidrug-resistant organisms are in advanced stages of clinical development.

With limited options and all the above-mentioned growing concerns, it would not be late where we will find ourselves in epidemics with multidrug-resistant organisms. We now have find alternative and economical options to fend off an otherwise catastrophe. Micek et al. [32] reported an improved outcome in sepsis when patients were put on empiric antibiotic therapy rather than the conventional monotherapy. A similar trial in treating UTI is yet to be evaluated. Kristensen and group [33] evaluated a Decision Support Group in a small Danish County in deciding the empirical treatment of bacteraemic urinary tract infection and found that a decision theoretic approach showed promise of improving empirical antibiotic treatment, and may be a measure to support an antibiotic policy. Such feat on a larger scale could help in establishing standardized empiric therapy. But care should be taken to include the prevalent organism and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the region as it varies over larger geographic areas due to various reasons.


The phenotypic confirmation of ESBL-positive organisms was done using only ceftazidime/clavulanic acid and not cefotaxime/clavulanic acid as per the latest CLSI guidelines. As a result, there may be underreporting of the incidence of ESBL organisms in the present study.

  Conclusion Top

Clinical presentation plays a minor role in establishing diagnosis in UTI. Diabetes and urogenital instrumentation were the major risk factors for UTI. E. coli is still the most widely prevalent organism causing UTI in the community, only that the alarmingly high rate of resistant ESBL species should draw our attention. The resistance pattern, though not that different from the rest of the world, is ever increasing due to uncontrolled abuse of the available antibiotics. A strong decision has to be established regarding the antibiotic policies for UTI and stringent measures have to be taken to ensure the effectiveness of the same. Failing to do so, the time is not far where we would have to stand helplessly against these organisms.

  References Top

1.Gonzalez CM, Schaeffer AJ. Treatment of urinary tract infection: what's old, what's new, and what works. World J Urol 1999; 6: 372-82.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Manges AR, Natarajan P, Solberg OD, Dietrich PS, Riley LW. The changing prevalence of drug-resistant Escherichia coli clonal groups in a community: evidence for community outbreaks of urinary tract infections. Epidemiol Infect 2006;134:425-31.   Back to cited text no. 2
3.Kahan NR, Chinitz DP, Waitman DA, Dushnitzky D, Kahan E, Shapiro M. Empiric treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection with fluoroquinolones in older women in Israel: another lost treatment option? Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:2223-7.   Back to cited text no. 3
4.Akram M, Shahid M, Khan AU. Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in JNMC Hospital Aligarh, India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2007;6:4.   Back to cited text no. 4
5.Kothari A, Sagar V. Antibiotic resistance in pathogens causing community-acquired urinary tract infections in India: a multicenter study. J Infect Developing Countries 2008;2:354-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.J N Ruben stein, A J Schaeffer. Managing complicated urinary tract infections- The urologic view. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2003;17:333-51.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 16th informational supplement. M100-S16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2006.   Back to cited text no. 7
8.Little P, Merriman R, Turner S, Rumsby K, Warner G, Lowes JA, et al. Presentation, pattern, and natural course of severe symptoms, and role of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among patients presenting with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care: observational study. BMJ 2010;340:5633.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Sepahi MA, Heidari A, Shajari A. Clinical manifestations and etiology of renal stones in children less than 14 years age. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:181-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.Patterson JE, Andriole VT. Bacterial urinary tract infections in diabetes. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:735-50.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Nicolle LE. Catheter-related urinary tract infection. Drugs Aging 2005;22:627-39.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Stamm WE. Urinary Tract Infections, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis. In: Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Longo DL, Braunwald E, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison's Text book of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. P. 1820-26.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Farajnia S, Alikhani MY, Ghotaslou R, Naghili B, Nakhlband A. Causative agents and antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary tract infections in the northwest of Iran. Int J Infect Dis 2009;13:140-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Goldstein FW. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from patients with community-acquired urinary tract infections in France. Multicentre Study Group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:112-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Stapleton A. Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes. Am J Med 2002;113:80-4.   Back to cited text no. 15
16.Bonadio M, Costarelli S, Morelli G, Tartaglia T. The influence of diabetes mellitus on the spectrum of uropathogens and the antimicrobial resistance in elderly adult patients with urinary tract infection. BMC Infectious Diseases 2006;6:54.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Kader AA, Angamuthu K. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and other gram-negative bacteria in a hospital in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2005;26:956-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Bean DC, Krahe D, Wareham DW. Antimicrobial resistance in community and nosocomial Escherichia coli urinary tract isolates, London 2005-2006. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2008;7:13.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Tankhiwale SS, Jalgaonkar SV, Ahamad S, Hassani U. Evaluation of extended spectrum beta lactamase in urinary isolates. Indian J Med Res 2004;120:553-6.   Back to cited text no. 19
20.Taneja N, Rao P, Arora J, Dogra A. Occurrence of ESBL and Amp-C beta-lactamases and susceptibility to newer antimicrobial agents in complicated UTI. Indian J Med Res 2008;127:85-8.   Back to cited text no. 20
21.Moland ES, Kim S-Y, Hong SG, Thomson KS. Newer β-lactamases: clinical and laboratory implications, Part II. Clin Microbiol Newsl 2008;30:79-85.   Back to cited text no. 21
22.DeBusscher J, Zhang L, Buxton M, Foxman B, Barbosa-Cesnik C. Persistent extended-spectrum beta-lactamase urinary tract infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:1862-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Pullukcu H, Tasbakan M, Sipahi OR, Yamazhan T, Aydemir S, Ulusoy S. Fosfomycin in the treatment of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli-related lower urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007;29:62-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Prakash V, Lewis JS 2nd, Herrera ML, Wickes BL, Jorgensen JH. Oral and parenteral therapeutic options for outpatient urinary infections caused by enterobacteriaceae producing CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1278-80.   Back to cited text no. 24
25.Colodner R, Keness Y, Chazan B, Raz R. Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired uropathogens in northern Israel. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;18:189-92.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Das RN, Chandrashekhar TS, Joshi HS, Gurung M, Shrestha N, Shivananda PG. Frequency and susceptibility profile of pathogens causing urinary tract infections at a tertiary care hospital in western Nepal. Singapore Med J 2006;47:281-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
27.Al Sweih N, Jamal W, Rotimi VO. Spectrum and antibiotic resistance of uropathogens isolated from hospital and community patients with urinary tract infections in two large hospitals in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2005;14:401-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
28.De Francesco MA, Ravizzola G, Peroni L, Negrini R, Manca N. Urinary tract infections in Brescia, Italy: Etiology of uropathogens and antimicrobial resistance of common uropathogens. Med Sci Monit 2007;13:136-44.  Back to cited text no. 28
29.Uzunovic-Kamberovic S. Antibiotic resistance of coliform organisms from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:344-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
30.Prais D, Straussberg R, Avitzur Y, Nussinovitch M, Harel L, Amir J. Bacterial susceptibility to oral antibiotics in community acquired UTI. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:215-8.   Back to cited text no. 30
31.Arias CA, Murray BE. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century--a clinical super-challenge. N Engl J Med 2009;360:439-43.   Back to cited text no. 31
32.Micek ST, Welch EC, Khan J, Pervez M, Doherty JA, Reichley RM, et al. Empiric combination antibiotic therapy is associated with improved outcome against sepsis due to Gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:1742-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
33.Kristensen B, Andreassen S, Leibovici L, Riekehr C, Kjaer AG, Schψnheyder HC. Empirical treatment of bacteraemic urinary tract infection. Evaluation of a decision support system. Dan Med Bull 1999;46:349-53.  Back to cited text no. 33


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]

This article has been cited by
1 Drug-Resistant E. coli Causing UTI and Its Homoeopathic Management: Two Evidence-Based Case Reports
Hima Bindu Ponnam, Santosh Kumar Jagadabhi
Homœopathic Links. 2022; 35(03): 214
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Effectiveness of Structured Counseling and Preventive Strategies in Promoting Awareness and Expressed Habitual Practices Toward Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection Among Women of Reproductive Age Group: A Pilot Study
Sonia Karen Liz Sequera, Leena Kunnath Chacko
Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Comprehensive assessment of holding urine as a behavioral risk factor for UTI in women and reasons for delayed voiding
S. Jagtap, S. Harikumar, V. Vinayagamoorthy, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. Dongre
BMC Infectious Diseases. 2022; 22(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern of the Uropathogens in a Rural Hospital
Sweta Jangra, Priti Agarwal, Manisha Khandait, Shweta Solanki, Priyanka Jangra
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Sumangala Biswas, Priyadarshini Priyadarshini, Anita Sundi, Piyali Gupta, Preety Mohankumar
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Study of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli from Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infections
Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Mostafa Abd El Salam, Osama Ahmed Faried
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets. 2021; 21(2): 243
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Urinary Tract Infection in Chronic Kidney Disease Population: A Clinical Observational Study
Mythri Shankar, Shashikala Narasimhappa, Madhura N.S.
Cureus. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Comparision of bacterial urinary tract infection in catheterised and non catheterised patients
Vasundhara Sharma, Somya Shukla, V K Singh, Umar Farooq, Sudhir Singh, Shweta R Sharma, Imran Ahmed
IP International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical Diseases. 2021; 7(4): 288
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Bacterial biofilm dependent catheter associated urinary tract infections: Characterization, antibiotic resistance pattern and risk factors
Reham Ramadan, Nesrene Omar, Mohamed Dawaba, Dalia Moemen
Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2021; 8(1): 64
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Urinary Tract Infection among Iranian Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Alireza Khatony, Masoud Mohammadi, Faranak Jafari, Aliakbar Vaisi-Raygani, Rostam Jalali, Nader Salari
Ageing International. 2021; 46(2): 170
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Five years trend of bacteriological profile and antibiogram of urinary tract infections at a rural medical college hospital in North Kerala, India: 2012-16
Sumita Rajeevan, Ramakrishna Pai J, Syed Mustaq Ahmed, Ann Taisy George, Preethy Edavaloth
Indian Journal of Microbiology Research. 2020; 7(2): 175
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 A Cross Sectional Study on Risk Factors, Clinical Profile and Aetiology of Acute Pyelonephritis in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Kerala
Mohammed Shafi P.K., Rosh P
Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2020; 7(52): 3159
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Mohit Bhatnagar, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Sandeep Nimba Deore, Akash Kumar, Abhraneel Guha, Mandeep Joshi, Quency Michael Dcosta, Shreya Verma
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Multidrug Resistant Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infection: A Constant Threat to a Tertiary Care Health Set-up in North India
Sanjay S Kaira, ID Khan
Journal of Medical Academics. 2018; 1(1): 15
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Molecular Characterisation of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India
Arindam Chakraborty, Prabha Adhikari, Shalini Shenoy, Vishwas Saralaya
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017; 35(2): 305
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Bacterial biofilm-based catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Causative pathogens and antibiotic resistance
Nargis Sabir, Aamer Ikram, Gohar Zaman, Luqman Satti, Adeel Gardezi, Abeera Ahmed, Parvez Ahmed
American Journal of Infection Control. 2017; 45(10): 1101
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Comparison of community-onset healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired urinary infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producingEscherichia coliand antimicrobial activities
N. Saltoglu,R. Karali,M. Yemisen,R. Ozaras,I. I. Balkan,B. Mete,F. Tabak,A. Mert,N. Hondur,R. Ozturk
International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Changing Profile of Pediatric Community-acquired UTI in a Hospital in South India
P. Venkat Ramanan,S. Sharma,V. Krishna
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Propensity for biofilm formation by clinical isolates from urinary tract infections: developing a multifactorial predictive model to improve antibiotherapy
M. J. Alves,J. C. M. Barreira,I. Carvalho,L. Trinta,L. Perreira,I. C. F. R. Ferreira,M. Pintado
Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2014; 63(Pt_3): 471
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Clinical and laboratory profiles of urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a tertiary care center in central Saudi Arabia
Al-Otaibi, F.E. and Bukhari, E.E.
Saudi Medical Journal. 2013; 34(2): 171-176
21 Urinary tract infection in children
Amir, S. and Rahim, F. and Mohammad Afridi, J.
Journal of Medical Sciences (Peshawar). 2013; 21(1): 13-15
22 The isolation and the biofilm formation of uropathogens in the patients with catheter associated urinary tract infections (UTIs)
Niveditha, S. and Pramodhini, S. and Umadevi, S. and Kumar, S. and Stephen, S.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012; 6(9): 1478-1482
23 High prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing pathogens: Results of a surveillance study in two hospitals in Ujjain, India
Pathak, A. and Marothi, Y. and Kekre, V. and Mahadik, K. and Macaden, R. and Lundborg, C.S.
Infection and Drug Resistance. 2012; 5(1): 65-73
24 Etiologic profile and antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired urinary tract infection in two Cameroonian towns
Akoachere, J.-F.T.K. and Yvonne, S. and Akum, N.H. and Seraphine, E.N.
BMC Research Notes. 2012; 5(219)
25 Prevalence of plasmid mediated blaTEM-1 and blaCTX-M-15 type extended spectrum beta–lactamases in patients with sepsis
Shahzad F Haque,Saeedut-Z Ali,Mohammed TP,Asad U Khan
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2012; 5(2): 98
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Prevalence of plasmid mediated bla TEM-1 and bla CTX-M-15 type extended spectrum beta-lactamases in patients with sepsis
Haque, S.F., Ali, S.-Z., TP, M., Khan, A.U.
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2012; 5(2): 98-102
27 Etiologic profile and antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired urinary tract infection in two Cameroonian towns
Jane-Francis Tatah Akoachere,Suylika Yvonne,Njom Akum,Esemu Seraphine
BMC Research Notes. 2012; 5(1): 219
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Mortality Associated with Community-Acquired Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli in Patients Admitted to a District Hospital in a Resource-Limited Setting
Gerardo Alvarez-Uria, Uvummala Priyadarshini, Praveen K. Naik, Manoranjan Midde, Raghuprakash Reddy
Clinics and Practice. 2012; 2(3): 189
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Nitrofurantoin: An alternative therapy for uncomplicated cystitis in the era of antimicrobial resistance
Asha Pai, K.B., Rai, R., Sanjeev, H., Karnaker, V.K., Krishna Prasad, M.S.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011; 5(5): 964-966


Print this article  Email this article


© Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07