Advertisment
Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:1293

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (540 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Patients and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
  Acknowledgments
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3014    
    Printed113    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded200    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 189-192
 

Sevelamer carbonate experience in Indian end stage renal disease patients


1 Dialysis Unit, Tamilnad Kidney Research Foundation, Kilpauk, Chennai, India
2 Department of Nephrology and Transplant Medicine, Fortis Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Nephrology, Pusphawati Singhania Research Institute, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Nephrology, Ezhil Hospital, Tondiarpet, Chennai, India
5 Department of Nephrology, Shree Samarth Hospital, Hrishikesh Medical Foundation 9, Nasik, India
6 Department of Nephrology, Janaki Hospital, Aurangabad, India
7 Department of Nephrology, JSS Hospital, Mysore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2012

Correspondence Address:
G Abraham
Tamilnad Kidney Research Foundation, No. 766, Poonamalli High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.98754

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 

This open label, multicentric, comparative clinical trial was done to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two sevelamer formulations, sevelamer carbonate, and sevelamer hydrochloride, in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in Indian end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A total of 97 ESRD patients on hemodialysis, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either sevelamer carbonate or sevelamer hydrochloride. All patients were evaluated every week for 6 weeks for efficacy and safety variables. Total 88 patients completed the study. After 6 weeks of therapy, there were similar reductions (P<0.0001) in mean serum phosphorus and the CaxP product both the groups. The responder rates for test and reference groups were 75%, 68.18% respectively (P=0.3474). The adverse events reported were nausea, abdominal pain/discomfort, heartburn, constipation, diarrhea, increased prothrombin time, and severe arthritis. No serious adverse events were reported. There was no significant difference between the groups for adverse events and the laboratory parameters. From the results of this multicentric, comparative, randomized clinical study on sevelamer carbonate we can recommend that sevelamer carbonate may be used as a phosphate binder in Indian chronic kidney disease patients.


Keywords: Chronic renal failure, end stage renal disease, hyperphosphatemia, sevelamer carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride


How to cite this article:
Abraham G, Kher V, Saxena S, Jayakumar M, Chafekar D, Pargaonkar P, Shetty M, Reddy Y, Reddy Y. Sevelamer carbonate experience in Indian end stage renal disease patients. Indian J Nephrol 2012;22:189-92

How to cite this URL:
Abraham G, Kher V, Saxena S, Jayakumar M, Chafekar D, Pargaonkar P, Shetty M, Reddy Y, Reddy Y. Sevelamer carbonate experience in Indian end stage renal disease patients. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Jan 17];22:189-92. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2012/22/3/189/98754



  Introduction Top


Sevelamer hydrochloride is a nonabsorbed, calcium-free, aluminum-free phosphate binder for lowering serum phosphorus in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. [1] Sevelamer is a cross-linked polymer that binds dietary phosphate ions within the gastrointestinal tract. It reduces phosphate absorption and thereby decreases serum phosphate concentrations without altering other electrolyte concentrations in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on hemodialysis. Sevelamer is resistant to digestive degradation and is not absorbed across the gastrointestinal tract. Sevelamer also decreases the incidence of hypercalcemic episodes associated with calcium acetate treatment. [2],[3],[4]

Sevelamer carbonate is an improved, buffered form of sevelamer hydrochloride. Sevelamer carbonate has the same polymeric structure as sevelamer hydrochloride. The only difference in two molecules is the anion: carbonate versus chloride. This replacement provides alkali that may benefit chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. [1]

The efficacy of the sevelamer carbonate in reducing serum phosphorus is expected to be the same as that of sevelamer hydrochloride, as the hydrochloride and carbonate salts have no role in phosphate binding. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sevelamer carbonate hydrochloride in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in Indian ESRD patients.


  Patients and Methods Top


Study design

This was an open label, multicentric, and comparative clinical trial. A total of 97 patients were enrolled. All patients received either sevelamer carbonate (test) or sevelamer hydrochloride (reference). Patients were evaluated every week for 6 weeks for efficacy and safety variables. Study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of participating institutions. This study was performed in accordance with the principles laid down in Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient selection

Study population comprised of adult Indian ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, with a serum phosphorus level of ≥6 mg/dl. Patients were screened after obtaining the written informed consent for enrolment in the trial. Other phosphate binders, if any, were withdrawn for the period necessary before therapy. Patients with significant hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia (serum calcium >11.0 mg/dl or <7.9 mg/dl), significant concurrent illness, gastrointestinal disorders, malignancy, patients consuming medications containing aluminum, calcium, phosphorus, or magnesium, patients with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values (excluding markers of ESRD) and patients with known hypersensitivity to sevelamer were excluded. Also excluded were the women who were pregnant or lactating or of child bearing potential and not practicing effective methods of contraception.

Intervention

A patients were given a washout period of 2 weeks, during which no phosphate binder was administered. Randomization was carried out by using the software available online at www.randomization.com and using the words "test" for sevelamer carbonate and "reference" for sevelamer hydrochloride. Since, this was an open label study, no blinding was done. Then, either sevelamer hydrochloride (800 mg, three times a day) OR sevelamer carbonate (800 mg, three times a day or 1200 mg twice a day) treatment was initiated in all 97 patients as per the randomization. Dose of sevelamer was decided according to the serum phosphorus levels at the time of initiation of treatment. Duration of treatment was of 6 weeks.

The dosage regimen was as follows: For serum phosphorus >5.5 and <7.5 mg/dl, the dose was 2400 mg/day and for serum phosphorus ≥7.5 mg/dl, the dose was 4800 mg/day in divided doses. After every two-week intervals, the dose was to be increased (if serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dl) or decreased (if serum phosphorus <3.5 mg/dl) by one tablet per meal.

Other phosphate binders were not allowed during the study. Patients were instructed to refrain from taking aluminum, calcium, or magnesium containing medications. However, vitamin D supplementation was allowed provided dose was kept constant throughout the study period. Any concomitant treatment taken by the patient was recorded in the case report form.

End points

The primary end point was the response rate. The responders were defined as those patients showing a reduction in serum phosphorus levels by at least 1 mg/dl, or having serum phosphorus value <5.5 mg/dl at the end of treatment.

The secondary end-points were reduction in serum phosphorus levels, reduction in serum calcium levels and reduction in the calcium × phosphorus product (calculated).

The safety end points were the occurrence of adverse events. During each visit, patients were monitored for changes in laboratory parameters of serum creatinine, urea, alkaline phosphatase, chloride, albumin, and bicarbonate.

Statistical methods

With the proposed sample size of 97 patients, the study would have power of 90% to detect a mean difference of 1.0 with a standard deviation of 1.5. [5] The sample size of 48 per group would also have 80% power to detect a difference of 25% between the groups.

The changes in serum phosphorus, serum calcium and Ca×P product were analyzed using Student's t-test. The responder rates were compared using Fischer's exact test. For all purposes, the "P" value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

A statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad InStat version 3.06 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA, Copyright 1992-1998 GraphPad Software Inc. (www.graphpad.com).


  Results Top


Ninety-seven (68 male, 29 female) patients were enrolled over seven centers. The baseline parameters are provided in [Table 1]. Total 88 (63 male, 25 female) patients completed the study. The flow of the participants through the study is given in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Flow of the participants through study

Click here to view
Table 1: Demographics

Click here to view


Efficacy

The changes in S. phosphorus, S. calcium, and Ca×P product and the responder rates (%) in both the groups are as given in [Table 2].
Table 2: Efficacy end points before and after therapy

Click here to view


Safety

There were no serious adverse events reported during the study period. The adverse events seen in sevelamer carbonate 800, sevelamer carbonate 1200, and sevelamer hydrochloride 800 groups were: nausea (6%, 0%, 2%, respectively), abdominal pain/discomfort (3%, 8%, 5%), heartburn (0%, 8%, 7%), constipation (6%, 8%, 0%), diarrhoea (0%, 8%, 0%), increased prothrombin time (3%, 0%, 0%), and severe arthritis (0%, 0%, 2%). After applying Fisher's exact test, no significant difference was found between the groups.


  Discussion Top


Sevelamer carbonate is an anion exchange resin with the same polymeric structure as sevelamer hydrochloride in which carbonate replaces chloride. The replacement of the chloride with carbonate as the anion provides alkali that may benefit CKD patients.

A previous study [6] showed that sevelamer carbonate and sevelamer hydrochloride were well tolerated and equivalent in controlling serum phosphorus in patients with CKD on HD. A preclinical study [7] has shown that sevelamer may have important actions in decreasing diabetic and uremic vasculopathy and that sevelamer carbonate may be capable of increasing bone formation rates that are suppressed by diabetic nephropathy. Many studies have reported that sevelamer is associated with significantly less coronary artery calcification progression than calcium-based binders. [8],[9],[10] This ultimately results in lower mortality in dialysis patients. [11]

Sevelamer carbonate has been approved by US-FDA for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic renal disease on hemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sevelamer carbonate in Indian CKD patients on hemodialysis who need phosphate binders.

The results of this Indian multicentric, comparative, randomized clinical study show that, in its ability to decrease mean serum phosphate levels in Indian CKD patients on hemodialysis, sevelamer carbonate is as effective (mean decrease=1.75 mg/dl, P>0.0001) as sevelamer hydrochloride (mean decrease=1.66 mg/dl, P>0.0001). In terms of responder rates sevelamer hydrochloride showed responder rate of 68.18%, while sevelamer carbonate showed responder rates of 70.97% (800 mg tablets), and 84.62% (1200 mg tablets) with mean of 75% (P=0.3474). It should be noted that frequency of hemodialysis affects this responder rate. In this study, the median frequency of hemodialysis was two sessions per week. Both the salts also decreased the Ca×P product value to below ideal goal level of 55 mg 2 /dl 2 .

The results of this study also show that the total daily dose of sevelamer carbonate, whether dosed in two or three divided doses, provides similar efficacy and tolerability. In fact, a study [1] suggests that even once a day dosing may be adequate.

The limitation of the study is the lack of PTH measurement and lack of data on vascular calcification. But the utility of such PTH values is difficult to judge given the wide interindividual, intraindividual variations and limitations of different assay technologies in quantifying iPTH levels. [12] Also the study was merely a noninferiority study and was not designed to compare the efficacy of the two formulations.

Both the salts (carbonate and hydrochloride) were equally well tolerated. The incidences of the side-effects are similar to that published for both the salts of sevelamer and as expected, majority of them are related to the gastrointestinal system.


  Conclusion Top


From the results of this Indian multicentric, comparative, randomized clinical study on sevelamer carbonate we can recommend that sevelamer carbonate may be used as a phosphate binder in Indian chronic kidney disease patients.


  Acknowledgments Top


The authors are thankful to Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Pune, India for providing the study medications.

This study was not registered as neither the registry was existent nor the registration was mandatory in India at the time of conduct of the study.

 
  References Top

1.Duggal A, Hanus M, Zhorov E, Dagher R, Plone MA, Goldberg J, et al. Novel dosage forms and regimens for sevelamer-based phosphate binders. J Ren Nutr 2006;16:248-52.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Bleyer AJ, Burke SK, Dillon M, Garrett B, Kant KS, Lynch D, et al. A comparison of the calcium-free phosphate binder sevelamer hydrochloride with calcium acetate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;33:694-701.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Chertow GM, Burke SK, Dillon MA, Slatopolsky E. Long-term effects of sevelamer hydrochloride on the calcium×phosphate product and lipid profile of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2907-14.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Slatopolsky EA, Burke SK, Dillon MA. RenaGel. A nonabsorbed calcium- and aluminum-free phosphate binder, lowers serumphosphorus and parathyroid hormone. The RenaGel Study Group. Kidney Int 1999;55:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Joy MS, Finn WF; LAM-302 Study Group. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration, phase III study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of lanthanum carbonate: A new phosphate binder for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42:96-107.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Delmez J, Block G, Robertson J, Chasan-Taber S, Blair A, Dillon M, et al. A randomized, double-blind, crossover design study of sevelamer hydrochloride and sevelamer carbonate in patients on hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 2007;68:386-91.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Mathew S, Lund RJ, Strebeck F, Tustison KS, Geurs T, Hruska KA. Reversal of the adynamic bone disorder and decreased vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease by sevelamer carbonate therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:122-30.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Asmus HG, Braun J, Krause R, Brunkhorst R, Holzer H, Schulz W, et al. Two year comparison of sevelamer and calcium carbonate effects on cardiovascular calcification and bone density. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:1653-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Block GA, Spiegel DM, Ehrlich J, Mehta R, Lindbergh J, Dreisbach A, et al. Effects of sevelamer and calcium on coronary artery calcification in patients new to hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2005;68:1815-24.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Chertow GM, Burke SK, Raggi P; Treat to Goal Working Group. Sevelamer attenuates the progression of coronary and aortic calcification in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002;62:245-52.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Block GA, Raggi P, Bellasi A, Kooienga L, Spiegel DM. Mortality effect of coronary calcification and phosphate binder choice in incident hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2007;71:438-41.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Gardham C, Stevens PE, Delaney MP, LeRoux M, Coleman A, Lamb EJ. Variability of parathyroid hormone and other markers of bone mineral metabolism in patients receiving hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:1261-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Phosphate binders for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis: a comparison of safety profiles
Francesco Locatelli,Lucia Del Vecchio,Leano Violo,Giuseppe Pontoriero
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2014; 13(5): 551
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Sevelamer Carbonate: A Review in Hyperphosphataemia in Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease
Caroline M. Perry,Greg L. Plosker
Drugs. 2014; 74(7): 771
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07