Advertisment
Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:151

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (280 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1710    
    Printed51    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded74    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 235-236
 

Feasibility of screening for urinary abnormalities as a part of school health appraisal


1 Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, India
2 Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Community Medicine, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2012

Correspondence Address:
N Kamath
Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore 560 034
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.98807

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Iyengar A, Goud B R, Kamath N, Phadke K D, Kasthuri A. Feasibility of screening for urinary abnormalities as a part of school health appraisal. Indian J Nephrol 2012;22:235-6

How to cite this URL:
Iyengar A, Goud B R, Kamath N, Phadke K D, Kasthuri A. Feasibility of screening for urinary abnormalities as a part of school health appraisal. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Jan 23];22:235-6. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2012/22/3/235/98807


Sir,

Urinary abnormalities can be asymptomatic in children and identified only by screening tests. [1] Several South East Asian countries perform urine screening as a part of regular health evaluation for school children. This is an effective method for prevention and early detection of chronic kidney disease. [2],[3],[4] No study has been conducted in India on urine screening in school children. The objectives were to study the prevalence of asymptomatic proteinuria and hematuria in school children and assess the feasibility of screening urine as a part of annual school health appraisal. We conducted a cross-sectional study from October 2008 to June 2009 among school children aged 5-16 years from schools in the urban slums of Bangalore. After obtaining informed consent from parents and teachers, a mid-stream sample of urine was freshly collected in a sterile container and tested within 30 minutes for proteinuria and hematuria using URS-9 (Teco diagnostics) dipsticks. Proteinuria 1+ to 4+ (30->2000 mg/dl) and hematuria 1+ to 4+ (10-200 RBC/μl) were considered abnormal. Hematuria was confirmed by microscopic examination. The reevaluation of isolated microscopic hematuria is recommended weekly for 2 weeks to look for persistence of hematuria. [5],[6] However, we were able to reevaluate only after 3 months.

A total of 1597 children were included in this study. The male to female ratio was 1:1. A total of 752 (47.27%) children were between 5 and 10 years of age and 845 (52.72%) were between 11 and 16 years.

The prevalence of urinary abnormalities on initial evaluation was 7.82% (95% CI 3.2, 9.4). Proteinuria and hematuria on the first evaluation were seen in 1.9% and 5.8%, respectively. There was a significantly higher prevalence of urinary abnormalities in older children (9.8%), compared to younger children (5.18%) (P<0.01). Only 54.5% of the children with urinary abnormalities were available for re-evaluation. The prevalence of urinary abnormalities reduced from 7.8% to 1.9%. Those children who had persistent urinary abnormalities were advised to come to the Pediatric Nephrology OPD for further evaluation.

The prevalence of proteinuria and hematuria in our study population is comparable with other studies where the prevalence of hematuria varies from 0.5-7.2%. [2],[3],[4],[7],[8],[9] The prevalence of urinary abnormalities was significantly higher in the older age group and this was in concordance with other studies. [4],[8],[9] Persistent urinary abnormalities were found in 1.98% of children. This may be falsely low as only 55% were reassessed. The reduction in the prevalence may be due to transient abnormalities.

The feasibility of screening was assessed. Urine samples were obtained in all children. However, repeat evaluation could be done only in 55%. Younger children needed assistance with urine collection. The dipsticks could be split vertically into two parts to reduce the cost. The cost of urine screening was Rs. 10 per child and the time taken for screening was 5 to 7 minutes per child. Hence, urine screening is a simple, noninvasive, inexpensive, and feasible test which can be incorporated into the school health appraisal process.

We concluded that urine screening is a simple and feasible method for diagnosis of urinary abnormalities in asymptomatic children which requires periodic re-evaluation.

The limitations of our study were that an early morning urine sample was not collected. Repeat evaluation was done only after a gap of 3 months. Only 55% of children with urinary abnormalities were available for repeat evaluation. Further evaluation for the etiology of proteinuria and hematuria could add significance to the screening of urinary abnormalities in these children.

 
  References Top

1.Hogg RJ. Screening for CKD in Children: A Global Controversy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:509-15.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Murakami M, Yamamoto H, Ueda Y, Murakami K, Yamauchi K. Urinary screening of elementary and junior high-school children over a 13-year period in Tokyo. Pediatr Nephrol 1991;5:50-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Cho BS, Kim SD. School urinalysis screening in Korea. Nephrology (Carlton) 2007;12 Suppl 3:S3-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Zhai YH, Xu H, Zhu GH, Wei MJ, Hua BC, Shen Q, et al. Efficacy of urine screening at school: Experience in Shanghai, China. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:2073-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Meyers KE. Evaluation of hematuria in children. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31:559-73, x. Review.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Phadke KD, Vijayakumar M, Sharma J, Iyengar A; Indian Pediatric Nephrology Group. Consensus statement on evaluation of hematuria. Indian Pediatr 2006;43:965-73.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Yap HK, Quek CM, Shen Q, Joshi V, Chia KS. Role of urinary screening in children in the prevention of chronic kidney disease. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005;34:3-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Rao J, Zhou L, Shen Q, Sun L, Fang X, Liu H, et al. School urinalysis screening in Shanghai. World J Pediatr 2006;2:195-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Jafar TH, Chaturvedi N, Hatcher J, Khan I, Rabbani A, Khan AQ, et al. Proteinuria in South Asian children: Prevalence and determinants. Pediatr Nephrol 2005;20:1458-65.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07