Advertisment

Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:604

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (351 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1705    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded105    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 155-156
 

Utility of renal allograft biopsy: An audit of 80 allograft biopsies


Department of Pathology Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India

Date of Web Publication25-Mar-2013

Correspondence Address:
A K Prayaga
Department of Pathology Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.109450

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Uppin M S, Prayaga A K, Murty KD. Utility of renal allograft biopsy: An audit of 80 allograft biopsies. Indian J Nephrol 2013;23:155-6

How to cite this URL:
Uppin M S, Prayaga A K, Murty KD. Utility of renal allograft biopsy: An audit of 80 allograft biopsies. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 30];23:155-6. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2013/23/2/155/109450


Sir,

Histologic analysis of allograft biopsies and their correlation with clinical features has helped in many revisions of the Banff classification for renal transplant pathology. We report an audit of allograft biopsy data of two years at our center and its correlation with clinical features.

A total of 80 biopsies were performed in 56 patients over a period of two years in 48 male and 8 female patients with the age range 5-67 years [Table 1]. These included five children (18 years). All were live-related transplants. The basic causes of end-stage renal disease were: hypertension (n0 = 24), diabetes mellitus (n = 17) or vesicoureteral reflux disease (6), IgA nephropathy (3), membranous nephropathy (2), postinfectious glomerulonephritis (2), Alport's disease (1), and traumatic damage of congenital single kidney (1).
Table 1: Renal biopsy findings and clinical details (n=80)


Click here to view


Indication for biopsy included acute graft dysfunction (58), chronic graft dysfunction (14), proteinuria ( n = 1), and change in immunosuppression protocol ( n = 7). Serum creatinine level at the time of biopsy ranged from 1.4 to 7.1 mg/dl (Mean 2.4 mg/dl).

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) accounted for 7.5% of the cases which is comparable to other published studies from India [1] but less when compared to the western studies. [2] The discrepancy is attributable to the biopsy policies; ACR being higher in centers doing protocol biopsies. ACR is common in first two weeks post-transplant, but it ranged from 1 month to 16 years in our study.

Borderline rejection was seen in four of our biopsies (5%); three were done beyond the routine time for acute rejection. Some of the studies showed that borderline changes can progress to early Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) if left untreated. [3]

The morphologic features of acute humoral rejection (AHR) were identified in 9 biopsies (11.2%), two were C4d-positive. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were not available for these patients. All the patients showed dramatic response to anti-rejection treatment with mean follow-up creatinine level of 1.3 mg/dl. The incidence of AHR with analysis of morphologic features, C4d, and DSA ranges 0-8%. [4] Tubulitis or arterial fibrinoid necrosis was not seen in any of the biopsies. Some of the recent studies have also emphasized the existence of C4d-negative AHR. [5]

The causes of renal cortical necrosis (RCN) in transplant settings include technical problems related to the surgery, ABO incompatibility, hyperacute rejection, Hendytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS), and thrombotic microangiopathies. [6] All the three cases (3.8%) of RCN were seen in association of AHR. There was no evidence of renal artery thrombosis in any of these cases. Cortical necrosis in the setting of AHR is seen to be associated with positive DSA and negative C4d. [7] Cortical necrosis is an indicator of early graft loss and these patients need to be followed-up for changes of CAN.

The urine culture showed growth of Pseudomonas and E. coli in two of four patients reported as acute pyelonephritis (5%). Two of the patients responded to antibiotic treatment.

Six patients of calcinuric inhibitor (CNI) toxicity (8.7%) were on tacrolimus and one on cyclosporine. The reported incidence in literature is 12.1% in adult and as high as 35.5% of the pediatric transplants. [8]

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is caused by endothelial injury secondary to vasoconstriction-associated ischemia and is seen with CNI, infections, humoral rejection, ischemia, or recurrence of HUS. [9] Two cases of TMA were attributed to CNI toxicity, C4d was negative in both. Follow-up creatinine levels were high; one case showed significant chronicity changes.

Two cases with recurrence of disease presented with proteinuria. One was IgA nephropathy, presented after 3 years, one was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) presented after 10 years.

Seven biopsies showed CAN. Five of these patients had documentation of delayed graft function ( n = 2), cyclosporine withdrawal ( n = 1), recurrent infections ( n = 2). The follow-up creatinine remained high (mean 3.6 mg/dl) in all the patients with three mortalities.

Banff (2003) has abolished the term CAN with the purpose of documenting the exact cause for chronicity. [10] Five cases in the present study showed non-specific features of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and two had transplant glomerulopathy (TG) with thickening and splitting of capillary loops. The reported incidence is 20% of biopsies at five years of transplantation. One of the biopsy with TG had positive C4d suggesting a possibility of chronic humoral rejection as per Banff (2007).

Acute tubular necrosis was noted in 26.2% of the biopsies. Twenty-four of the biopsies were normal on histology. Most of these biopsies were performed with clinical diagnosis of CNI toxicity.

 
  References Top

1.Ranjan P, Nada R, Jha V, Sakhuja V, Joshi K. The role of C4d immunostaining in the evaluation of the causes of renal allograft dysfunction. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1735-41.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Troxell ML, Weintraub LA, Higgins JP, Kambham N. Comparison of C4d immunostaining methods in renal allograft biopsies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;1:583-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Masin-Spasovska J, Spasovski G, Dzikova S, Petrusevska G, Dimova B, Lekovski LJ, et al. The evolution of untreated borderline and subclinical rejections at first month kidney allograft biopsy in comparison with histological changes at 6 months protocol biopsies. Prilozi 2005;26:25-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Collins AB, Schneeberger EE, Pascual MA, Saidman SL, Williams WW, Tolkoff-Rubin N, et al. Complement activation in acute humoral renal allograft rejection: Diagnostic significance of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:2208-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Haas M. C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: Evidence for its existence and effect on graft survival. Clin Nephrol 2011;75:271-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Shiradhonkar S, Jha R, Rao BS, Narayan G, Sinha S, Swarnalata G. Acute cortical necrosis following renal transplantation in a case of sickle cell trait. Indian J Nephrol 2011;21:286-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
7.Mauiyyedi S, Crespo M, Collins AB, Schneeberger EE, Pascual MA, Saidman SL, et al. Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:779-87.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Kambham N, Nagarajan S, Shah S, Li L, Salvatierra O, Sarwal MM. A novel, semiquantitative, clinically correlated calcineurin inhibitor toxicity score for renal allograft biopsies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Ardalan MR. Review of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and post-renal transplant TMA. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2006;17:235-44.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.Bhowmik DM, Dinda AK, Mahanta P, Agarwal SK. The evolution of the Banff classification schema for diagnosing renal allograft rejection and its implications for clinicians. Indian J Nephrol 2010;20:2-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Utility of renal allograft biopsy: An audit of 80 allograft biopsies
Mubarak, M.
Indian Journal of Nephrology. 2013; 23(6): 466-467
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07