Advertisment

Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:172

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
  Search
 
  
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~Related articles
 ~  Article in PDF (671 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Material and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4817    
    Printed73    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded190    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 13    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 359-364
 

Role of gut-derived uremic toxins on oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease


1 Department of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Nephrology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication31-Aug-2017

Correspondence Address:
P. V. L. N. Srinivasa Rao
Department of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati - 517 507, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_71_17

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 


Several cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have been identified among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gut-derived uremic toxins (GDUT) are important modifiable contributors in this respect. There are very few Indian studies on GDUT changes in CKD. One hundred and twenty patients older than 18 years diagnosed with CKD were enrolled along with forty healthy subjects. The patients were classified into three groups of forty patients based on stage of CKD. Indoxyl sulfate (IS), para cresyl sulfate (p-CS), indole acetic acid (IAA), and phenol were estimated along with the assessment of oxidative stress (OS), inflammatory state, and bone mineral disturbance. All the GDUT increased across the three groups of CKD. All patients had higher levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) as compared to controls. IS and IAA showed positive association with MDA/FRAP corrected for uric acid, whereas IS and p-CS showed positive association with IL-6. IS, IAA, and phenol showed a positive association with calcium × phosphorus product. GDUT increase OS and inflammatory state in CKD and may contribute to CVD risk.


Keywords: Cardiovascular disease risk, chronic kidney disease, gut-derived uremic toxins


How to cite this article:
Gouroju S, Rao PS, Bitla A R, Vinapamula K S, Manohar S M, Vishnubhotla S. Role of gut-derived uremic toxins on oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Indian J Nephrol 2017;27:359-64

How to cite this URL:
Gouroju S, Rao PS, Bitla A R, Vinapamula K S, Manohar S M, Vishnubhotla S. Role of gut-derived uremic toxins on oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 16];27:359-64. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2017/27/5/359/213023





  Introduction Top


Several cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have been identified among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).[1] The presence of CKD itself has been identified as a CVD risk factor,[2] contributing to endothelial dysfunction. One feature responsible for this is accumulation of uremic toxins. Intestine is an important source of some uremic toxins. Apart from acting as a route for entry of uremic toxins, intestine undergoes changes in the composition of fermenting flora, leading to altered processing of uremic toxin precursors.[3] The gut-derived uremic toxins (GDUT) include endogenously produced molecules without interference by intestinal absorption (uric acid, xanthine), ingested exogenous toxins (advanced glycation end-products), and ingested exogenous products undergoing metabolic modification (derivatives of amino acids, phenol, and indoles). GDUT release inflammatory substances by leukocytes causing endothelial dysfunction.[4] Studying GDUT levels have come to focus with the development of strategies to modify intestinal absorption and metabolism of these toxins with the use of pre/probiotics, dietary modification, and adsorbent therapies. Available literature on GDUT is mostly from the western countries. The GDUT levels can also depend on serum albumin, ethnic variations, and dietary habits,[5] thereby indicating the need for Indian data. However, there are very few Indian studies.[6] Hence, the present study was taken up to estimate GDUT, namely, indoxyl sulfate (IS), para cresyl sulfate (p-CS), indole acetic acid (IAA), and phenol along with the role of GDUT on oxidative stress (OS), inflammation, and mineral metabolism in various stages of CKD in a South Indian cohort.


  Material and Methods Top


The present study was conducted between September 2011 and December 2013 in the Department of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. One hundred and twenty patients older than 18 years of age diagnosed to have CKD and willing to participate were enrolled along with forty healthy subjects. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. The patients were classified into three groups of forty patients each (G1 = stages 1 and 2 or early CKD; G2 = stages 3 and 4 or advanced CKD; G3 = end-stage renal disease) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using Cockcroft-Gault formula.[7] Patients undergoing hemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis, those on antioxidant therapy or vitamin supplementation, taking pro/prebiotics, anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive drugs, and patients with active inflammatory disease or with abnormal liver function were excluded from the study.

Five milliliters of the peripheral venous blood was collected into heparinized bulb. Plasma was separated and was either analyzed immediately or stored at −80°C. GDUT were estimated using high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector[8] using Schimadzu HPLC system (LC-20A, Kyoto, Japan). Serum deproteinization and bound uremic solutes displacement were done as part of sample pretreatment. Mobile phase A consisted of 2.76 g/L (20 mM) NaH2 PO4, H2O, and 1.85 g/L (5 mM) tetrabutylammonium iodide in water, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. For elution, a 1.5 mL/min isocratic flow with 22:78 of A: B mobile phase was used. Twenty microliters of the sample was spiked, and quantification was done using fluorescence detection at specific excitation and emission wavelengths for individual molecules. The concentrations of uremic solutes were calculated using the standard calibration curves using fluorescence detector. The retention times were 4.8 min for phenol, 5.9 min for IAA, 12.5 min for IS, and 16.5 min for p-CS. Three samples spiked to study recovery showed 93% recovery in the normal range and 97% in the uremic range.

To study the effect of OS, malondialdehyde (MDA) and ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) were measured using spectrophotometric methods. The effect of inflammation was assessed by the measurement of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Nitric oxide (NO) levels were estimated to study the status of endothelial function. Calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were estimated for assessing the mineral metabolism status. Urea and creatinine were estimated for assessing renal function. MDA, FRAP, and NO were estimated using spectrophotometric methods.[9],[10],[11] Urea, creatinine, Ca, P, and hsCRP were quantified using commercially available kits on Beckman Synchron autoanalyzer (Beckman Coulter, USA). IL-6 was estimated by ELISA using commercial kits on ChemWell analyzer (Awareness Technology, USA). A comprehensive score was calculated to have an estimate of the sum effect of GDUT on the pathophysiological factors for CVD risk studied. MDA/FRAP corrected for uric acid (FRAP_U), IL-6, and Ca × P product were included in the generation of the score. Values below or equal to control median level of each of the parameters were taken as no risk (score of 0), up to 25% above control median were given a score of 1, between 25% and 50% above control median were given a score of 2, and more than 50% above control median were given a score of 3.

Statistical analysis

Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used to test the significance of difference in parameters studied. Data for uremic toxins were normalized by logarithmic transformation for regression analysis to study association between uremic toxins and CVD risk factors. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


  Results Top


Demographic data and the biochemical parameters studied are presented in [Table 1]. The scatterplots showing the distribution of GDUT are shown in [Figure 1]. There was an increase in all the GDUT across the three groups of CKD. Plasma levels of IS and p-CS were increasing with progression of CKD. The increase found in IS, IAA, and phenol was earlier to p-CS. All patients with CKD had significantly higher levels of MDA, FRAP, hsCRP, IL-6, and calculated comprehensive score (P < 0.001) compared to controls. NO levels showed a significant decrease (P < 0.001) compared to controls.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics and biochemical markers studied in controls and chronic kidney disease patients

Click here to view
Figure 1: Scatterplots showing the distribution of gut-derived uremic toxins

Click here to view


The association of GDUT with renal function and CVD risk factors is shown in [Table 2]. All the four uremic toxins showed significant negative association with eGFR. IS and IAA showed significant positive association with MDA and MDA/FRAP_U. IS and p-CS showed significant positive association with IL-6. IS, IAA, and phenol showed a significant positive association with Ca × P product. Only IS showed a positive association with the comprehensive score, indicating its involvement in all the three pathophysiological factors studied.
Table 2: Association of gut-derived uremic toxins with renal function and cardiovascular disease risk factors

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Uremic toxins have been identified to be important links in the causation of accelerated atherosclerosis in patients with CKD.[12] GDUT have come to particular focus with the development of strategies to reduce intestinal absorption of these toxins. In the present study, all the GDUT studied, i.e., IS, p-CS, IAA, and phenol, were found to be higher in CKD patients (P = 0.009 for IS, P < 0.001 for p-CS and phenol, P = 0.001 for IAA) compared to controls. The levels of these toxins also increased progressively with increasing stage of CKD (IS: P < 0.001; p-CS: P = 0.003; IAA: P = 0.001; phenol: P = 0.004). However, except for IS which showed a continuous increase, other GDUT studied did not show further increase after Group 2 CKD [Figure 1]. Similar increase was reported for IS,[13],[14] p-CS,[14],[15] IAA,[16] and phenol.[17] The mechanisms proposed for increased generation of GDUT include decreased absorption of amino acids resulting in availability of substrate for metabolism by microbes, alteration of gut flora in favor of proteolytic microorganisms producing more toxin precursors, abnormal intestinal motility resulting in increased absorption of bacterial toxins along with decreased renal clearance.[18]

Association of gut-derived uremic toxin with renal function

All four GDUT studied except phenol showed significant positive association with creatinine, whereas all showed negative association with eGFR [Table 2]. Meijers et al.[19] showed significant positive correlation between total IS and creatinine but not with p-CS, whereas Lin et al.[20] observed significant positive correlation with both IS and p-CS. Liabeuf et al.[15] and Barreto et al.[13] reported significant inverse association of GFR with p-CS and IS, respectively. These and our findings suggest decreased clearance as one of the reasons for accumulation of GDUT.

Gut-derived uremic toxins and oxidative stress

Both OS markers studied, MDA and FRAP were found to be elevated in patients with CKD (P < 0.001) as compared to controls. Similar findings were reported in other studies.[21],[22] About 60% of the total antioxidant power measured by FRAP assay is contributed by uric acid.[23] Hence, FRAP_U and MDA/FRAP_U were considered as the combined effect of oxygen radical production and nonenzymatic antioxidant defense. MDA/FRAP_U was significantly higher in CKD patients (P < 0.001) compared to controls, indicating increased production of oxygen-free radicals as the main reason for OS in CKD. Among the GDUT studied, IS and IAA showed positive association with MDA (P < 0.001 and 0.020 for IS and IAA, respectively) as well as with MDA/FRAP_U (P = 0.011 and 0.025 for IS and IAA, respectively). These results suggest that the OS in CKD is predominantly due to overproduction of oxygen-free radicals and IS and IAA contribute to the increased production of oxygen radicals.

Rossi et al.[24] reported that free IS and p-CS were associated with glutathione peroxidase in patients with stages 3 and 4 CKD. Chao and Chiang[25] reported that uremic toxins are potent inducers of OS and contribute to tissue damage. Studies involving animal models showed that upregulation of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2), a source of renal reactive oxygen species (ROS) through nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) dependent or independent pathways, may induce OS.[25],[26] IAA was shown to increase COX-2 levels, thereby contributing to ROS generation.[16] Dou et al.[27] showed that IS significantly increased ROS production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells through activation of NADPH oxidase. They also observed that both oxidized and reduced forms of glutathione were inhibited by IS.

Gut-derived uremic toxins and Inflammation

CKD has been reported to be associated with inflammation. In the present study, both the inflammatory markers studied, hsCRP and IL-6, were elevated in CKD patients when compared with controls (P < 0.001). The rise in hsCRP occurred early in CKD and there was no further increase with progression of the disease. However, IL-6 showed a continuous increase with progression of CKD (P < 0.001). Among the GDUT studied, IS (P < 0.001) and p-CS (P = 0.044) showed significant positive association with IL-6. Thus, findings of the present study show that GDUT mainly IS and p-CS have a pro-inflammatory effect.

The increase in the levels of inflammatory markers in CKD patients could be due to their decreased renal clearance and other coexisting factors.[28] Rossi et al.[24] found that IS and p-CS correlated significantly with IL-6 in stages 3 and 4 CKD patients. Dou et al.[16] found significant positive correlation between IAA and CRP. Accumulated IS is shown to cause injury to tubular cells and induce leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells through endothelial cell inflammation.[29],[30] In experimental models, p-CS promoted expression of inflammatory genes and contributed to renal cell injury.[31] However, some studies found no significant association between uremic toxins and hsCRP.[25] Increased hsCRP levels observed in the present study could be a result of increased synthesis of CRP by liver which is triggered in response to IL-6.[32]

Gut-derived uremic toxins and mineral metabolism

Disturbances in Ca and P metabolism are observed in CKD[33] and GDUT have been identified to contribute to this disturbance in mineral metabolism through causing OS in bone and cardiovascular systems.[34] In the present study, there was an increase in Ca × P product with progressing CKD (P < 0.001). IS, IAA, and phenol showed significant positive association with Ca × P product (P = 0.001, P = 0.012, and P = 0.010, respectively). A previous study has similarly reported a significant positive correlation of p-CS and IS with Ca × P.[35] IS has been shown to be vasculotoxic by promoting aortic calcification.[36]

To understand the influence of GDUT on the pathophysiological factors leading to increased CVD risk associated with CKD, a comprehensive score was calculated. It was observed that CKD patients had higher risk score when compared to controls (5.47 ± 1.99 vs. 2.85 ± 2.26; P < 0.001). IS, which was involved in all the factors, showed positive association with this risk score.

Thus, findings of the present study suggest that GDUT are associated with increased OS, inflammatory state, and bone mineral disturbance. As a result, the increased GDUT levels observed in CKD patients contribute to the increased CVD risk of CKD patients. Hence, treatment in the form of use of pre/probiotics and adsorbent therapies or dietary modifications to reduce the levels of GDUT can be useful in reducing CVD risk in CKD.

Financial support and sponsorship

We thank Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences and Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, for providing financial support under Sri Balaji Arogya Vara Prasadini Scheme (Grant No.: SBAVP-RG/Ph. D/08).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Muntner P, Hamm LL, Kusek JW, Chen J, Whelton PK, He J. The prevalence of nontraditional risk factors for coronary heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:9-17.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: A statement from the American Heart Association Councils on kidney in cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure research, clinical cardiology, and epidemiology and prevention. Circulation 2003;42:1050-65.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Schepers E, Glorieux G, Vanholder R. The gut: The forgotten organ in uremia? Blood Purif 2010;29:130-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Moradi H, Sica DA, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Cardiovascular burden associated with uremic toxins in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 2013;38:136-48.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Piccoli GB, Vigotti FN, Leone F, Capizzi I, Daidola G, Cabiddu G, et al. Low-protein diets in CKD: How can we achieve them? A narrative, pragmatic review. Clin Kidney J 2015;8:61-70.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Babu SK, Sivakumar V, Agarwal R, Kumar BS, Solomon A, Kumar A. Serum indoxylsulphate in chronic uraemics. Indian J Nephrol 1998;8:85-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Botev R, Mallié JP, Couchoud C, Schück O, Fauvel JP, Wetzels JF, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate: Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease formulas compared to renal inulin clearance. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:899-906.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Calaf R, Cerini C, Génovésio C, Verhaeghe P, Jourde-Chiche N, Bergé-Lefranc D, et al. Determination of uremic solutes in biological fluids of chronic kidney disease patients by HPLC assay. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2011;879:2281-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 1979;95:351-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 1996;239:70-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cortas NK, Wakid NW. Determination of inorganic nitrate in serum and urine by a kinetic cadmium-reduction method. Clin Chem 1990;36(8 Pt 1):1440-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Pletinck A, Glorieux G, Schepers E, Cohen G, Gondouin B, Van Landschoot M, et al. Protein-bound uremic toxins stimulate crosstalk between leukocytes and vessel wall. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:1981-94.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Barreto FC, Barreto DV, Liabeuf S, Meert N, Glorieux G, Temmar M, et al. Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1551-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rossi M, Campbell K, Johnson D, Stanton T, Pascoe E, Hawley C, et al. Uraemic toxins and cardiovascular disease across the chronic kidney disease spectrum: An observational study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014;24:1035-42.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Liabeuf S, Barreto DV, Barreto FC, Meert N, Glorieux G, Schepers E, et al. Free p-cresylsulphate is a predictor of mortality in patients at different stages of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:1183-91.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Dou L, Sallée M, Cerini C, Poitevin S, Gondouin B, Jourde-Chiche N, et al. The cardiovascular effect of the uremic solute indole-3 acetic acid. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:876-87.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Niwa T. Phenol and p-cresol accumulated in uremic serum measured by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Clin Chem 1993;39:108-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Vanholder R, Glorieux G. The intestine and the kidneys: A bad marriage can be hazardous. Clin Kidney J 2015;8:168-79.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Meijers BK, De Loor H, Bammens B, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y, Evenepoel P. p-Cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1932-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lin CJ, Chen HH, Pan CF, Chuang CK, Wang TJ, Sun FJ, et al. p-Cresylsulfate and indoxyl sulfate level at different stages of chronic kidney disease. J Clin Lab Anal 2011;25:191-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Durak I, Kaçmaz M, Elgün S, Oztürk HS. Oxidative stress in patients with chronic renal failure: Effects of hemodialysis. Med Princ Pract 2004;13:84-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Erdogan C, Unlüçerçi Y, Türkmen A, Kuru A, Cetin O, Bekpinar S. The evaluation of oxidative stress in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Chim Acta 2002;322:157-61.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Benzie IF, Strain JJ. Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: Direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. Methods Enzymol 1999;299:15-27.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rossi M, Campbell KL, Johnson DW, Stanton T, Vesey DA, Coombes JS, et al. Protein-bound uremic toxins, inflammation and oxidative stress: A cross-sectional study in stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease. Arch Med Res 2014;45:309-17.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Chao CT, Chiang CK. Uremic toxins, oxidative stress, and renal fibrosis: An interwined complex. J Ren Nutr 2015;25:155-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Bai Y, Sigala W, Adams GR, Vaziri ND. Effect of exercise on cardiac tissue oxidative and inflammatory mediators in chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 2009;29:213-21.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Dou L, Jourde-Chiche N, Faure V, Cerini C, Berland Y, Dignat-George F, et al. The uremic solute indoxyl sulfate induces oxidative stress in endothelial cells. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:1302-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hsu HJ, Yen CH, Wu IW, Hsu KH, Chen CK, Sun CY, et al. The association of uremic toxins and inflammation in hemodialysis patients. PLoS One 2014;9:e102691.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Niwa T. Uremic toxicity of indoxyl sulfate. Nagoya J Med Sci 2010;72:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ito S, Osaka M, Higuchi Y, Nishijima F, Ishii H, Yoshida M. Indoxyl sulfate induces leukocyte-endothelial interactions through up-regulation of E-selectin. J Biol Chem 2010;285:38869-75.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Poveda J, Sanchez-Niño MD, Glorieux G, Sanz AB, Egido J, Vanholder R, et al. p-cresyl sulphate has pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic actions on human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:56-64.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Surekha RH, Madhavi G, Srikhant BM, Jharna P, Rao UR. Serum ADA and C-reactive protein in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Hum Genet 2006;6:195-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lekawanvijit S, Kompa AR, Wang BH, Kelly DJ, Krum H. Cardiorenal syndrome: The emerging role of protein-bound uremic toxins. Circ Res 2012;111:1470-83.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Tanaka H, Komaba H, Koizumi M, Kakuta T, Fukagawa M. Role of uremic toxins and oxidative stress in the development of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. J Ren Nutr 2012;22:98-101.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Wu IW, Hsu KH, Lee CC, Sun CY, Hsu HJ, Tsai CJ, et al. p-Cresyl sulphate and indoxyl sulphate predict progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:938-47.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Adijiang A, Goto S, Uramoto S, Nishijima F, Niwa T. Indoxyl sulphate promotes aortic calcification with expression of osteoblast-specific proteins in hypertensive rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1892-901.  Back to cited text no. 36
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Indoxyl sulfate- and P-cresol-induced monocyte adhesion and migration is mediated by integrin-linked kinase-dependent podosome formation
Sofía Campillo, Lourdes Bohorquez, Elena Gutiérrez-Calabrés, Diego García-Ayuso, Verónica Miguel, Mercedes Griera, Yolanda Calle, Sergio de Frutos, Manuel Rodríguez-Puyol, Diego Rodríguez-Puyol, Laura Calleros
Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Indole-3-acetic acid correlates with monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio (MHR) in chronic kidney disease patients
Valeria Cernaro, Vincenzo Calabrese, Saverio Loddo, Roberta Corsaro, Vincenzo Macaione, Valentina Teresa Ferlazzo, Rosalia Maria Cigala, Francesco Crea, Concetta De Stefano, Guido Gembillo, Adolfo Romeo, Elisa Longhitano, Domenico Santoro, Michele Buemi, Salvatore Benvenga
International Urology and Nephrology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Indoxyl sulfate, homocysteine, and antioxidant capacities in patients at different stages of chronic kidney disease
Cheng-Hsu Chen, Shih-Chien Huang, En-Ling Yeh, Pei-Chih Lin, Shang-Feng Tsai, Yi-Chia Huang
Nutrition Research and Practice. 2022; 16(4): 464
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Can curcumin supplementation reduce plasma levels of gut-derived uremic toxins in hemodialysis patients? A pilot randomized, double-blind, controlled study
Roberta T. Salarolli, Livia Alvarenga, Ludmila F. M. F. Cardozo, Karla T. R. Teixeira, Laís de S. G. Moreira, Jordana D. Lima, Silvia D. Rodrigues, Lia S. Nakao, Denis Fouque, Denise Mafra
International Urology and Nephrology. 2021; 53(6): 1231
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Dietary strategies for gut-derived protein-bound uremic toxins and cardio-metabolic risk factors in chronic kidney disease: A focus on dietary fibers
Ebru Melekoglu, F. Gulhan Samur
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2021; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Cerebro-renal interaction and stroke
Birva Shah, Priya Jagtap, Deepaneeta Sarmah, Aishika Datta, Swapnil Raut, Ankan Sarkar, Mariya Bohra, Upasna Singh, Falguni Baidya, Kiran Kalia, Anupom Borah, Kunjan R. Dave, Dileep R. Yavagal, Pallab Bhattacharya
European Journal of Neuroscience. 2021; 53(4): 1279
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 The Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on the Reactivity of Smooth Muscle Cells of Pial Arteries in Nephrectomized Rats
I. B. Sokolova, N. N. Pavlichenko
Cell and Tissue Biology. 2021; 15(2): 127
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Implications of oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease: a review on current concepts and therapies
Sagar Verma, Priyanka Singh, Shiffali Khurana, Nirmal Kumar Ganguly, Ritushree Kukreti, Luciano Saso, Devinder Singh Rana, Vibha Taneja, Vinant Bhargava
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice. 2021; 40(2): 183
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Vascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: Diversity in the Vessel Wall
Prabhatchandra Dube, Armelle DeRiso, Mitra Patel, Dhanushya Battepati, Bella Khatib-Shahidi, Himani Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Deepak Malhotra, Lance Dworkin, Steven Haller, David Kennedy
Biomedicines. 2021; 9(4): 404
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Association between Circulation Indole-3-Acetic Acid Levels and Stem Cell Factor in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Ping-Hsun Wu, Yi-Ting Lin, Pei-Yu Wu, Hei-Hwa Lee, Su-Chu Lee, Szu-Chun Hung, Szu-Chia Chen, Mei-Chuan Kuo, Yi-Wen Chiu
Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(1): 124
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Gut-Derived Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins
Amanda L. Graboski, Matthew R. Redinbo
Toxins. 2020; 12(9): 590
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 5/6 nephrectomy: renal tissue regeneration and condition of brain microcirculation
I. B. Sokolova, G. T. Ivanova
Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2020; 24(4): 87
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Uremic Toxins from the Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Is There a Relationship between Them?
Jessyca Sousa de Brito, Natália Alvarenga Borges, Juliana Saraiva dos Anjos, Lia Sumie Nakao, Milena Barcza Stockler-Pinto, Bruna Regis Paiva, Luciene de Carvalho Cardoso-Weide, Ludmila Ferreira M. de F. Cardozo, Denise Mafra
Biochemistry. 2019; 58(15): 2054
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

© Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07