|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 341-348
Effect of vitamin D on urinary angiotensinogen level in early diabetic nephropathy
Himansu Sekhar Mahapatra1, Adarsh Kumar1, Bindu Kulshreshtha2, Anubhuti Chitkara3, Anamika Kumari1
1 Department of Nephrology, ABVIMS, Dr. R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Endocrinology, ABVIMS, Dr. R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Biochemistry, ABVIMS, Dr. R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||20-Feb-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||05-Aug-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||27-Jan-2021|
Prof. Himansu Sekhar Mahapatra
307, Admn Block, PGI Building, ABVIMS, Dr R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Urinary angiotensinogen (UAGT) is supposed to be a marker of activation of the intrarenal renin– angiotensin system (RAS) system in early diabetic nnephropathy (EDN). Vitamin D has been studied as a negative regulator of the circulating and tissue RAS activity, so its supplementation may prevent the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN). This study was planned to assess the RAS activation and effect of vitamin D supplementation in EDN progression by estimating the UAGT level. Methods: A total of 103 EDN subjects were randomized in two groups to receive either cholecalciferol (54) or matching placebo (49) in a double-blind manner. All were subjected to routine investigations, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), UAGT, vitamin D, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) at the 0 and 6 months. A total 40 healthy controls were also included for assessment of the same investigations at 0 month. Results: Significant reduction of UACR, UAGT, and iPTH level were corroborated with an increase in 25(OH) vitamin D level from 0 to 6 months (all four P < 0.001). After 6 months, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] of UAGT and UACR levels was significantly lower in the cholecalciferol group as compared to placebo group (p < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). The median UAGT level was significantly higher in patients with EDN (cholecalciferol & placebo Group) than control group at 0 month (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Significantly higher UAGT levels in EDN supports the role of intrarenal RAS activation. A significant decrease in UAGT level in the cholecalciferol group supports the beneficial role of vitamin D supplementation in the progression of EDN.
Keywords: Early diabetic nephropathy, urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR), urinary angiotensinogen, vitamin D
|How to cite this article:|
Mahapatra HS, Kumar A, Kulshreshtha B, Chitkara A, Kumari A. Effect of vitamin D on urinary angiotensinogen level in early diabetic nephropathy. Indian J Nephrol 2021;31:341-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Mahapatra HS, Kumar A, Kulshreshtha B, Chitkara A, Kumari A. Effect of vitamin D on urinary angiotensinogen level in early diabetic nephropathy. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 9];31:341-8. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/text.asp?2021/31/4/341/308020
| Introduction|| |
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most frequent causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) accounting for 30–50% of all cases of CKD. Among five stages of DN, first three stages are early and next two stages are overt DN. Major challenges of early-stage DN (EDN) prevention are the inability to identify high-risk patients, emphasizing the importance of discovering new therapeutic targets/markers in clinical trials.,,
Many locally expressed tissue renin–angiotensin systems (RASs) have also been identified in tissues such as the kidney, vascular endothelium, pancreas, etc. It has been seen that urinary angiotensinogen (UAGT) is produced locally in the kidneys, but not through systemic renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activation. UAGT levels may be associated with intrarenal RAS activation in diabetic patients at an early stage. Sawaguchi et al. studied the association between UAGT levels and renal progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). They have suggested the median cut-off value of UAGT to creatinine ratio was 24.7 μg/g. Bancha Satirapoj et al. have observed that UAGT levels are correlated with progressive deterioration of renal function in patients with type 2 DM
Vitamin D has been implicated as a potential contributor to the pathophysiology of extraosseous conditions, including hypertension, kidney disease, and diabetes.,, Existing evidence supports vitamin D as a negative regulator of the circulating and tissue RAS activity. Therefore, its supplementation may prevent the progression of DN by acting as an additional intervention by blocking local tissue level RAS. Recent studies have shown a significant reduction of albuminuria in patients with DN after vitamin D supplementation., Triyaki et al. proposed that vitamin D supplementation might blunt albuminuria by reducing UAGT levels reflecting intrarenal RASS status.
This study was carried out to explore the effect of vitamin D supplementation in EDN progression and to assess renal RAS activation by estimating UAGT.
| Methods|| |
The study was a single-center, parallel-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed from February 2018 to August 2019 at our Hospital after approval of Institute Ethics Committee. Inclusion criteria: Patients of diabetes mellitus with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥120ml/min/1.73 m2 with unrestricted albumin-to-creatinine (ACR) value and diabetic patients with eGFR : 60–120 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ACR 30–300 mg. Exclusion criteria: Diabetic patients receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE I) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, hypercalcemia (>10.5 mg/dl), urinary tract infection (UTI), pregnancy, hypertension, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (>8.0%), vitamin D supplementation during the last 6 months.
Sample size calculation was proposed based on previous study. Considering 10% level of alpha error and power of at least 80%, a one-sided test is proposed, which results in a highest sample size of 146. Based on previous study, the standard deviation was found to be as follows: UAGT/Ucreat σ (Placebo) = 2.64; σ2 = 6.96 σ (Vit D) = 2.24; σ2 = 5.01. Considering 10% type I error (α) and 80% power, significant differences assumed are d = 0.86 (10% of 8.6), n = [σ2 (placebo) + σ2 (Vit D)] (Zα + Zβ) 2/d2 = (6.96 + 5.01) (1.28 + 0.84) 2/(0.86 × 0.86) = 72.73, say 73 (in each group).
Screening and randomization
All the subjects with diabetes of more than 25 years from the outpatient department were screened keeping in mind the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. A total of 730 diabetic patients were selected during the initial 6-months screening period. Of them, a total of 122 subjects qualified as EDN [Figure 1]. These participants were subjected to computer-based double-blind randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 in two groups, cholecalciferol group (61) and placebo group (61) by the investigator. A total of 40 healthy controls without diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN) or any other comorbid factors were also included in the study to assess the baseline study parameters. The study was performed during the autumn–winter period when the exposure to sunlight is usually reduced and vitamin D levels are low. During the study, all patients were maintained on constant dietary sodium intake of less than three grams of salt per day.
Intervention and follow-up
Before randomization, all subjects underwent baseline testing for urine routine and microscopy, UACR, kidney function tests, uric acid, lipid profile, HbA1C, UAGT, serum vitamin D, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). In addition to the standard treatment/care, both groups received a capsule of cholecalciferol and capsule of matching placebo, respectively. To maintain a strict blinding process among investigators and patients, laboratory technicians issued the capsules of cholecalciferol or matching placebo capsule as the allocations were blinded to the intervention. After randomization, cholecalciferol group received a loading dose of vitamin D 60000IU/week orally for 4 weeks and maintenance dose of 60000 IU/monthly orally for 4 months. Placebo group also received a placebo in the same frequency as in cholecalciferol group. All the patients were also contacted telephonically to ensure the drug intake. All investigations were repeated after 6 months in both groups. Only 103 subjects (cholecalciferol group -54 and placebo group - 49) completed the study for 6-month follow-up and were taken as the final sample for analysis [Figure 1].
Definitions: Hyper filtration: eGFR >120 mL/min/1.73 m2, Micro albuminuria: ≥30 mg/gm–299 mg/gm, Hypertension: Hypertension was defined as per Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC-8) guideline. Vitamin D insufficiency: 25(OH) vitamin-D level concentration <30 ng/ml.
Detailed clinical history (age, sex, duration of diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol drinking habits, and drug history (hypolipidemic drugs, antihypertensive, steroids, thyroid drugs besides oral hypoglycemic and insulin) were obtained. UACR was measured by the Clinitek status Urine analysis analyzer by Siemens (Normal reference value <30 mg/gm). eGFR was calculated by 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. iPTH was measured by third-generation immunoassay (normal reference range iPTH: <14–75 pg/ml). The 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was measured using chemiluminescence method in a fully automated machine, Vitros-Esi by Jhonson and Jhonson (Normal reference range: 30–56 ng/ml). For UAGT, morning spot urine samples were stored at -20°C after centrifugation (2000–3000 rpm) and measured by ELISA kits (3 Kits) (from SINCERE BIOTECH as batch analysis on Evolis Twin plus Biorad fully automated ELISA work station).
The collected data were transformed into variables, coded, and entered in Microsoft Excel and statistically evaluated using the SPSS-PC-20 version. Quantitative data were expressed as mean, median, standard deviation. The difference between the two groups was tested by using Student's t-test (independent sample) or Mann–Whitney 'U' test as per requirement. For the difference between more than two groups, analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or Kruskal–Wallis H test was used while pre post mean was compared by Paired't'-test or Wilcoxon–Sign rank test. A statistical difference between proportions was tested by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The 'p'values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
Out of 122 randomized subjects, 103 (cholecalciferol group-54 and placebo group-49) completed 6- months study period. Basic demography is shown in [Table 1] All the baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable between the cholecalciferol and placebo groups, except serum albumin, and phosphorus. UACR level was significantly higher in early DN patients compared to healthy control group (median (IQR): 57.6 (38.5–123) vs. 6.90 (4.10–13.80) mg/g; P < 0.001, [Figure 2].Ia). There was a significant difference in UAGT level in the early DN patients and control group at baseline. UAGT level was significantly higher in the early DN patients vs. control group ([median (IQR) 19.8 (11.20–33.20) vs. 17.05 (10.6–21.40) ng/ml; P < 0.001, [Figure 2].Ib]. The serum albumin in the early DN patients was significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.001). Serum calcium, albumin, and 25 OH vitamin D3 levels were lower and iPTH significantly higher in early DN patients compared to the control group [[Table 1] and [Figure 2].Ic].
|Table 1: Comparison of different baseline parameters between all three groups|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: (Ia) Baseline levels of UACR in cholecalciferol, placebo, and control groups, respectively, (Ib) baseline levels of UAGT in cholecalciferol, placebo, and control groups, (Ic) baseline levels of serum 25(OH) vitamin D in cholecalciferol, placebo, and control groups, (IIa) UACR level at 6 months in cholecalciferol and placebo groups, (IIb) UAGT level at 6 months in cholecalciferol and placebo groups, (IIc) serum 25(OH) vitamin D level at 6 months in cholecalciferol and placebo groups|
Click here to view
Comparison of biochemical parameters at 6 months
There was no significant change in the level of Hb1Ac, serum creatinine, phosphate, uric acid, triglyceride, and eGFR between cholecalciferol group and placebo at 6 months. Serum calcium level was significantly higher in the cholecalciferol group at 6 months (cholecalciferol and placebo group: 9.59 ± 0.64 mg/dl and 8.95 ± 0.68 mg/dl; P < 0.01).
There was a significant difference in UACR between the cholecalciferol and placebo group [median (IQR): 39.05 mg/g (23.97–104.8) and 60.0 mg/g (38.95–113.30)] respectively at 6 months. The UACR was significantly lower in the cholecalciferol group at 6 months (p = 0.04, [Figure 2].IIa). Median UAGT level after 6 months in the cholecalciferol and placebo group was 13.75 ng/ml and 18.70 ng/ml, respectively. The median UAGT level was significantly lower in the cholecalciferol group (p < 0.001, [Figure 2].IIb). There was a significant difference of 25(OH) vitamin D levels between the cholecalciferol and placebo group at 6 months. 25(OH) vitamin D level was significantly higher in the cholecalciferol group at 6 month [median (IQR): 24.45 ng/ml (19.80–30.12) vs. 18.60 ng/ml (14.80–22.90)]; P < 0.001, [Table 2], [Figure 2].IIc.
|Table 2: Comparison of different laboratory parameters at 6 months between both groups|
Click here to view
Changes of parameters at 6 months within both placebo and cholecalciferol group.
UACR and UAGT levels decreased in the cholecalciferol group [median change: -12.50 (-24.82 to -5.95); P value <0.001 and -6.60 (-20.91 to -2.63); P value <0.01, respectively, [Table 3]]. Serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels increased whereas iPTH decreased in the cholecalciferol group (both P value <0.001). Serum creatinine and eGFR did not change in either group. There was a significant correlation (r) of 25(OH) vitamin D level with UGAT and UACR at 6-month follow-up; r value: -0.255 (p value = 0.009) and r value: -0.28 (p value: < 0.01), respectively [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: (Ia) showing correlation of serum 25(OH) vitamin D level with urinary angiotensinogen level at 6 months, (Ib) showing correlation of serum 25(OH) vitamin D level with UACR level at 6 months|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Changes in laboratory parameters at the 6-month follow-up visit|
Click here to view
There were no adverse events except self-limiting nausea in the placebo group in two patients and in the vitamin D subgroup in three patients, which did not require discontinuations of drugs during the study. There were no hospitalizations or serious adverse events related to the intervention.
| Discussion|| |
This is the first study that showed the extraosseous benefit of vitamin D supplementation in preventing the progression of early DN. It showed decreasing UAGT, corroborated with increasing serum vitamin D levels in a 6-months period. It also ascertains the role of activation of intrarenal RAS, which starts at an early stage of DN and may be responsible for the disease initiation. In addition to lowering UAGT, vitamin D supplementation also lowered urinary albumin level, an established marker of progressive DN. Change in serum 25(OH) vitamin D significantly correlated with change in UAGT and albuminuria providing further evidence of the renoprotective role of vitamin D in EDN. These ?ndings support the existing few studies that have shown an association of vitamin D supplementation with UAGT level.,, It can be proposed that cholecalciferol supplementation may have renoprotective effect like ACEI or ARBS in EDN.
In this study age, sex ratio, and body mass index (BMI) were comparable in both the groups [Table 1]. Healthy controls were significantly younger in age and had insignificant lower BMI in comparison with EDN subjects as most of them are patient's relatives. This supports the association of diabetic CKD with obesity as shown in a recent study in Delhi wherein the frequency of association is between 55.1%.
Early DN patients enrolled in our study were either in the hyperfiltration stage or with microalbuminuria. There was no significant difference in the baseline mean eGFR value in all the groups, but it varied significantly between EDN and controls (almost three times that of the control group) as there were 14.5% patients (n = 15) at hyperfiltration stage among the study subjects. The prevalence of hyperfiltration in our screened subjects was 2% but previous studies reported its range between 6–73%. The prevalence of microalbuminuria among screened diabetic patients was 28.9% consistent with the earlier study in the Indian population. Although our study is a short follow-up, in consistent with our's, a recent metanalysis showed that eGFR was not affected by vitamin D supplementation in DN patients.
Vitamin D levels in DN patients were significantly lower in comparison to healthy controls, which is in consistent with our previous published study on the Indian population which showed the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 71% in T2DM patients. A study by Subramanian et al. showed that the average concentration of serum 25(OH) D3 was significantly lower for T2DM patients as compared with non-diabetic patients (11.0 ± 7.5 vs 15.5 ± 9.8, P = 0.00). Possible reasons hypothesized for low vitamin D levels in DN were (i.) loss of the major carrier protein (vitamin D binding protein) for 25(OH) D, (ii.) Nephrotic-range proteinuria associated with T2DM, (iii.) severe restriction of food containing vitamin D to avoid an excess of phosphorus intake, (iv.) little time spent to sunlight exposure and (v.) marked decrease in the renal proximal tubule expression of the endocytic receptor megalin. Ogasawara et al. demonstrated for the first time that exocytosis-mediated urinary megalin excretion increases along with the progression of DN, giving further contributions in the understanding of the association of DN to lower levels of vitamin D. The present study has observed significant increase in 25 (OH) vitamin D level after vitamin D supplementation consistent with the previous study. We also reported a significant decrease in serum iPTH level with cholecalciferol supplementation similar to that reported in the PENNY Trial. Of note, most of the enrolled patients were vitamin D deficient, which could explain the more impressive effects seen in our study. So, the reduction in iPTH could be achieved with cholecalciferol supplementation with no need for activated vitamin D compound at least in the EDN.
In our study, UAGT levels were significantly higher in patients with early DN compared to healthy control group. Results were comparable with the past study supporting the role of activation of the RAS system in early DN. Therefore, UAGT might be a sensitive novel biomarker in the detection of EDN. Other novel urinary biomarkers such as urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C were also studied in the Indian population and found to be raised early in DN.
Our results reported a significant decrease in UAGT level after vitamin D supplementation. It was in line with the RCT done by Tiryaki et al., only study assessed the correlation of vitamin D supplementation with UAGT level. The VITAL study was the first randomised controlled study done to study the role of Vitamin D receptor activator in patients with T2DM. In this study, there was a significant decrease in mean UACR from baseline to the last measurement during the treatment period in the vitamin D group versus placebo. Thereafter, teriyaki et al. showed that the administration of vitamin D receptor activator in combination with RAAS inhibitors had an additional benefit in lowering albuminuria in patients with DN. Our study was different from the past studies not only with the racial difference but also with the fact that patients were maintained on a constant sodium diet and these patients were not on RASS blocker, so not affecting the true assessment of UAGT level.,, As in our study, patients were already not on RASS blockers, the result showed a significant reduction in UAGT and UACR in the cholecalciferol group. The present study did not show a significant positive correlation of UAGT and UACR following 6-month treatment with cholecalciferol, which was shown in an earlier study by Teriyaki et al. Possible explanation for the weak correlation between UAGT and UACR in our study may be because of the different mechanism involved in the causation of albuminuria and UAGT in DN patients. Past study has shown that UAGT is mainly formed locally in the proximal tubules and albuminuria is mainly because of damage to the renal filtration barrier. It may also be because of the small sample size to show this correlation.
Strengths of study
All the confounding factors like compliance to drugs, autumn–winter seasonal, and constant dietary salt intake adherence were strictly monitored. Only early diabetic patients were included, as reversibility is more expected in these patients. Our patients were not on RASS blocker as RAS inhibitor was associated with the reduction in UAGT levels.,
The Diethylene Triamine Pentaacetic Acid (DTPA) could be a better indicator of eGFR but could not be done due to logistic issues. It was a short follow-up study to see the effect of vitamin D supplementation on eGFR. Although all the associated parameters with vitamin D have been analyzed in respect to the progression of DN; the exact dosage of its supplementation to reach adequate serum levels remains controversial.
To conclude, the present study showed that there were significantly higher UAGT and ACR in non-hypertensive early DN patients compared to the healthy controls, which support the role of intrarenal RASS activation. Further, it also shows beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation in slowing the progression of early DN as reflected by a significant reduction in UAGT over 6 months.
Human and Animal Rights (with IRB Approval number)
All procedures performed and planned in studies involving human participation were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee at which the studies were conducted (IRB approval No.TP (DM/MCH)) 18/2017)/IEC/PGIMER/RMLH-2093) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflict of interest
This report is not submitted elsewhere or under review. The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
| References|| |
Gheith O, Farouk N, Nampoory N, Halim MA, Al-Otaibi T. Diabetic kidney disease: Worldwide difference of prevalence and risk factors. Nephropharmacol 2016;5:49-56.
Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Remuzzi G. Retarding progression of chronic renal disease: The neglected issue of residual proteinuria. Kidney Int 2003;63:2254-61.
Ortiz A, Sanchez Nino MD, Rojas J, Egido J. Paricalcitol for reduction of albuminuria in diabetes. Lancet 2011;377: 635-36.
Ali Nehme, Fouad A, Zein Z, Zayeri D, Zibara K. An update on the tissue renin angiotensin system and its role in physiology and pathology. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2019;6:14-16.
Prabhu RA, Saraf K. Vitamin D in diabetic nephropathy. Post grad Med 2018;64:5-6.
Sawaguchi M, Araki SI, Kobori H. Association between urinary angiotensinogen levels and renal and cardiovascular prognoses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig 2012;3:318-24.
Satirapoj B, Siritaweesuk N, Supasyndh O. Urinary angiotensinogen as a potential biomarker of diabetic nephropathy. Clin Kidney J 2014;7:354-60.
Vaidya A, Forman JP. Vitamin D and hypertension: Current evidence and future directions. Hypertension 2010;56:774-9.
Patel TV, Singh AK. Role of vitamin D in chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol 2009;29:113-21.
Li HW, Brereton RE, Anderson RA, Wallace AM, Ho CK. Vitamin D deficiency is common and associated with metabolic risk factors in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Metab Clin Exp 2011;60:1475-81.
Li YC, Kong J, Wei M, Chen ZF, Liu SQ, Cao LP. 1, 25-DihydroxyvitaminD(3) is a negative endocrine regulator of the renin-angiotensin system. J Clin Invest 2002;110:229-38.
de Zeeuw D, Agarwal R, Amdahl M, Audhya P, Coyne D, Garimella T, et al
. Selective vitamin D receptor activation with paricalcitol for reduction of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes (VITAL study): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:1543-51.
Liyanage PLGC, Lekamwasam S, Weerarathna TP, Liyanage C. Effect of vitamin D therapy on urinary albumin excretion, renal functions, and plasma renin among patients with diabetic nephropathy: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Postgrad Med 2018;64:10-15.
] [Full text]
Tiryaki O, Usalan C, Sayiner ZA. Vitamin D receptor activation with calcitriol for reducing urinary angiotensinogen in patients with type 2 diabetic chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail 2016;38:222-7.
Dash SC, Agarwal SK, Panigrahi A, Mishra J, Dash D. Diabetes, hypertension and kidney disease combination “DHKD Syndrome” is common in India. J Assoc Physicians India 2018;66:31-3.
Tonneijck L, Muskiet MHA, Smits MM, van Bommel EJ, Heerspink HJL, van Raalte DH, et al
. Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: Mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:1023-39.
Varghese A, Deepa R, Rema M, Mohan V. Prevalence of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes mellitus at a diabetes centre in southern India. Postgrad Med J 2001;77:399-40.
Wang Y, Yang S, Zhou Q, Zhang H, Yi B. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on renal function, inflammation and glycemic control in patients with diabetic nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Blood Press Res 2019;44:72-87.
Mulatkar CP, Singh R, Mahapatra HS, Taneja A, Sharma N. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D level with carotid artery intima media thickness in Indian patients of type-2 diabetes mellitus. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci 2017;3:1051-7.
Subramanian A, Nigam P, Misra A, Pandey RM, Mathur M, Gupta R, et al
. Severe vitamin D deficiency in patients with Type 2 diabetes in north India. Diabetes Manage 2011;1:477-48.
Ogasawara S, Hosojima M, Kaseda R, Kabasawa H, Yamamoto-Kabasawa K, Kurosawa H. et al
. Significance of urinary full-length and ectodomain forms of megalin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1112-18.
Chitalia N, Ismail T, Tooth L, Boa F, Hampson G, Goldsmith D, et al
. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on arterial vasomotion, stiffness and endothelial biomarkers in chronic kidney disease patients. PLoS One 2014;9:913-63.
Zoccali C, Curatola G, Panuccio V, Tripepi R, Pizzini P, Versace M, et al
. Paricalcitol and endothelial function in chronic kidney disease trial. Hypertension 2014;64:1005-11.
Garg V, Kumar M, Mahapatra HS, Chitkara A, Gadpayle AK, Sekhar V. Novel urinary biomarkers in pre-diabetic nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol 2015;19:895-900.
Juretzko A, Steinbach A, Hannemann A, Endlich K, Endlich N, Friedrich N, et al
. Urinary angiotensinogen and renin excretion are associated with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press Res 2017;42:145-55.
Ogawa S, Kobori H, Ohashi N, Urushihara M, Nishiyama A, Mori T, et al
. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers reduce urinary angiotensinogen excretion and the levels of urinary markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Biomark Insights 2009;4:97-102.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||A Retrospective Analysis of the Relationship Between 25-OH-Vitamin D and Diabetic Foot Ulcer
| ||Fenglin Wang, Luyao Zhou, Di Zhu, Caizhe Yang |
| ||Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2022; Volume 15: 1347 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Effect of Vitamin D3 and Silver Nanoparticles on HaCaT Cell Viability
| ||Samuela Cataldi, Maria Rachele Ceccarini, Federica Patria, Tommaso Beccari, Martina Mandarano, Ivana Ferri, Andrea Lazzarini, Francesco Curcio, Elisabetta Albi |
| ||International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3): 1410 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The role of vitamin D deficiency and elevated inflammatory biomarkers as risk factors for the progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
| ||Ahmad El Askary, Amal F. Gharib, Mazen Almehmadi, Maha Mahfouz Bakhuraysah, Abdulaziz Ali Al Hajjiahmed, Layla Ibrahim Al-Hejji, Mohammed S. Alharthi, Alaa Shafie |
| ||Open Chemistry. 2021; 19(1): 1183 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|