Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:319

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology
 ~  Similar in PUBMED
 ~  Search Pubmed for
 ~  Search in Google Scholar for
 ~  Article in PDF (612 KB)
 ~  Citation Manager
 ~  Access Statistics
 ~  Reader Comments
 ~  Email Alert *
 ~  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


  Table of Contents  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 266-267

A strange case of renal graft lithiasis

1 Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
2 Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar do Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
4 Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
5 Department of Cirgury, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
6 Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal

Date of Submission05-Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance06-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication09-Mar-2022

Correspondence Address:
Elsa Soares
Rua Camilo Castelo Branco Apto 140, Setúbal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_54_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Soares E, Alves AR, Figueiredo I, Cotovio P, Vieira MB, Caeiro F, Silva C, Aires I, Carrelha S, Pena A, Remedio F, Forte P, Nolasco F. A strange case of renal graft lithiasis. Indian J Nephrol 2022;32:266-7

How to cite this URL:
Soares E, Alves AR, Figueiredo I, Cotovio P, Vieira MB, Caeiro F, Silva C, Aires I, Carrelha S, Pena A, Remedio F, Forte P, Nolasco F. A strange case of renal graft lithiasis. Indian J Nephrol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 1];32:266-7. Available from:

Lithiasis following renal transplantation is a rare complication with an incidence less than 1%.[1]

We present a 43-year-old Caucasian female with a history of chronic kidney disease secondary to ischemic nephropathy, arterial hypertension, and secondary hyperparathyroidism on peritoneal dialysis since February 2018. She was admitted for a deceased donor kidney transplant in June 2019. Induction immunosuppression included basiliximab, prednisone, mycophenolic acid, and tacrolimus. The surgery occurred without complications and a double-J ureteral stent was placed as part of the transplantation protocol.

The patient was discharged at day 7 with a serum creatinine 1.01 mg/dL and with three graft ultrasounds without changes. Two-weeks later started cinacalcet 30 mg daily to control hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcemia. According to the protocol of our unit, the stent is removed 1 month after transplantation. Due to a delay in the schedule, this procedure was performed on the 45th day after the transplant. The patient always had preserved diuresis and no urinary symptoms. Stent removal was attempted by cystoscopy, but the procedure was unsuccessful. An abdominal X-ray [Figure 1] showed a well-placed double-J stent, with hyperdense images in the extremities suggesting lithiasis. Two months later, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed, and small calculi were excreted. Another attempt for stent removal failed and 3 weeks later, the stent was removed by open surgery.
Figure 1: Double-J stent, with hyperdense images in the extremities suggesting lithiasis

Click here to view

Renal lithiasis investigation showed: normal serum calcium (9.7 mg/dL), phosphorus (2.2 mg/dL), magnesium (1.21 mg/dL), and bicarbonate (25.3 mmol/L, 22-26 mmol/L); increased PTH (541 pg/mL); sterile urine culture; diminished urinary uric acid excretion (28 mg/24 h, 250–750 mg/24 h); and normal urinary excretion of phosphorus (0.9 g/24 h, 0.4-1.3 g/24 h), calcium (126 mg/24 h, 100–300 mg/24 h), magnesium (75.9 mg/dL, 73–1229 mg/dL), citrate (276 mg/24 h, 250–1153 mg/24 h), and oxalate (20.1 mg/24 h, 4–31 mg/24 h). The chemical analysis of a kidney stone revealed a mixed calcium and phosphorus composition (brushite). A CT was not performed on the donor's kidney to exclude lithiasis, however, there was no history of the previous lithiasis, and the recipient of the other organ did not develop any changes.

Urolithiasis in the context of transplant is a quite rare event.[2] Typical renal colic or pain is usually absent because of denervation of the transplant kidney and ureter. Rarely, the presentation resembles acute rejection or acute tubular necrosis.[1] Factors predisposing to stone formation are hyperparathyroidism, hypercalciuria, recurrent urinary tract infection, and hypocitraturia due to renal tubular acidosis. Less common risk factors include outflow obstruction, foreign bodies such as stents, nephrostomy tubes, suture materials, and donor lithiasis.[1]

After the investigation, we assume that the cause was secondary hyperparathyroidism, with the contribution of some calciuric effect of cinacalcet. It has been reported that cinacalcet treatment for Post-transplantation persistent hyperparathyroidism is a contributing factor for graft calculus formation due to hypercalciuria. Even transient, hypercalciuria has the potential to promote renal calcium deposition.[3] However, this is a rare situation since most patients undergoing renal transplantation have this complication and do not develop lithiasis.

Keeping in mind the absence of typical symptoms, we must have a high index of suspicion, to make the diagnosis in time. Thus, the treatment will be quick, and we will avoid the consequences for the renal graft.

Informed consent

Informed consent to publish was obtained from the patient.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Kim H, Cheigh JS, Ham HW. Urinary stones following renal transplantation. Korean J Intern Med 2001;16:118-22.  Back to cited text no. 1
Harraz AM, Kamal AI, Shokeir AA. Urolithiasis in renal transplant donors and recipients: An update. Int J Surg 2016;36:693-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
Seager CM, Srinivas TR, Flechner SM. Development of nephrolithiasis in renal transplant patient during treatment with Cinacalcet. Ann Transplant 2013;18:31-5.  Back to cited text no. 3


  [Figure 1]


Print this article  Email this article


Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07