Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Trials
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Trials
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
35 (
6
); 746-752
doi:
10.25259/IJN_1_2025

Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Once Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in Calcineurin Inhibitor Dependent Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Corresponding author: Aditi Sinha, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. E-mail: aditisinhaaiims@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Govindarajan S, Sinha A, Hari P, Bagga A. Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Once Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in Calcineurin Inhibitor Dependent Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: A Pilot Study. Indian J Nephrol. 2025;35:746-52. doi: 10.25259/IJN_1_2025

Abstract

Background

Prolonged-release (PR) tacrolimus, used in solid-organ transplant recipients, has not been tested in nephrotic syndrome. This pilot study examined its efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in maintaining remission in patients with calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-dependent steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

Materials and Methods

This investigator-initiated, single-center, single-limb pilot study enrolled patients, aged 5-18 years, with CNI-dependent steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in stable remission (sustained remission; infrequent relapses) while receiving twice-daily therapy with immediate-release (IR) tacrolimus for 6-30 months (CTRI/2022/01/039427). Patients with steroid resistance, frequent relapses on IR-tacrolimus, CNI toxicity, or eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded. Eligible patients were switched to an equal total PR-tacrolimus (ODVenta®) dose for 6 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in stable remission at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included proportions with sustained remission; treatment failure; relapse rate; change from baseline in eGFR, HbA1c, and cholesterol; pharmacokinetic measures [24-hr trough (C0), trough-to-dose ratio (C0/TDDBSA-Adult), area under the curve (AUC0-24hr)]; and prevalence of the CYP3A5 c.6986A>G polymorphism.

Results

Of 45 children screened, 20 were enrolled at a median (IQR) age of 130 (102-181) months. At 6 months, 17 (85%) patients showed stable remission. Treatment failure comprised frequent relapses in two cases and late steroid-resistance in one. Over 6 months, levels of eGFR, HbA1c, cholesterol, and C0/TDDBSA-Adult were stable. There were no significant adverse events. AUC0-24, in seven patients, was 130.3 (81.6-158.6) ng*hr/mL. Patients expressing CYP3A5 (*01/*03; n=12) showed insignificantly lower C0 and C0/TDDBSA-Adult, than non-expressors (*03/*03; n=8).

Conclusion

PR-tacrolimus maintains stable remission in most patients with CNI-dependent steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. CYP3A5 polymorphism might influence drug levels and dose requirement.

Keywords

CYP3A5
Difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome
Pharmacokinetics
Tacrolimus

Introduction

Approximately 30-50% of patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome have frequently relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent (SD) disease course, which is associated with significant morbidity and risk of corticosteroid toxicity, necessitating therapy with steroid-sparing agents.1,2 While both calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), tacrolimus and cyclosporine, are potent and steroid-sparing, they are used chiefly in patients with difficult-to-treat disease, since they have significant toxicity, variable bioavailability, and narrow therapeutic index, which mandates drug level monitoring.3 Despite similar efficacy and risk of acute and chronic nephrotoxicity, tacrolimus is preferred to cyclosporine for its lack of cosmetic adverse effects. Therapy with tacrolimus requires twice-daily dosing, which might be associated with non-adherence. Tacrolimus is metabolized by the enzyme CYP3A5, and CYP3A5 genotypes with a single nucleotide polymorphism (c.6986A>G), influence inter-individual differences in drug 12-hr trough (C0) and trough to total daily dose ratio (C0/TDD).4

Prolonged-release (PR) tacrolimus formulation requires once daily administration. Retrospective and prospective series and small randomized trials in pediatric and adult transplant recipients suggest that PR-tacrolimus has comparable efficacy to conventional immediate-release (IR) preparations and might be associated with improved adherence.57 However, it has not been tested adequately in children with nephrotic syndrome, and there are limited data on its pharmacokinetics in relation to CYP3A5 polymorphism. This prospective single-limb interventional trial examined the efficacy and safety of once daily administration of PR-tacrolimus in sustaining remission of disease in patients with difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome managed satisfactorily on conventional IR-tacrolimus given twice daily, and to explore the relationship between drug pharmacokinetics and CYP3A5 polymorphism.

Materials and Methods

This investigator-initiated, open-label, single-limb, prospective, interventional, pilot study was conducted at a single tertiary care center in North India between January 2022 and July 2023. Following approval by the Institute Ethics Committee (IECPG-328/28.05.2021, RT-12/23.06.2021), the trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (http://ctri.nic.in; CTRI/2022/01/039427) and conducted according to the original protocol. This study report complies with the extension of item 5 of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Statement on Template for Intervention Description and Replication [TIDieR; Supplementary Table S1].8 The investigators conceived and designed the study protocol and vouch for its accuracy, completeness of data collection and analysis.

Supplementary Table S1

Patients

We screened 5-18 year-old patients with idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome and a difficult-to-treat CNI-dependent course, defined as follows: (i) frequent relapses or steroid dependence; (ii) failure of two or more immunosuppressive agents; and (iii) stable remission (sustained remission or infrequent relapses) during therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Patients on twice daily therapy with tacrolimus were eligible if cumulative CNI exposure was 6-30 months, disease was in stable remission while on CNI,3,9 and tacrolimus 12-hour trough (C0) was 3-7 ng/mL. Patients with initial or late steroid resistance, known secondary cause, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)10 <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, frequent relapses on tacrolimus therapy, immunosuppression other than prednisolone and tacrolimus in the last 6 months (e.g., cyclosporine, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide), seizures, recurrent headache, impaired glucose tolerance (fasting glucose >100 mg/dL or glycosylated hemoglobin, HbA1c >5.7%), refractory hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium <1.7 mg/dL, despite therapy with magnesium oxide), concomitant therapy with agents that affect tacrolimus bioavailability [Supplementary Table S2] and chronic infections (tuberculosis, HIV, hepatitis B or C) were excluded.

Supplementary Table S2

Intervention

Following written informed parental consent and, in children older than 7 years, written informed assent, eligible patients were enrolled. Details of disease course, therapy, and clinical findings, including anthropometry standard deviation scores (SDS),11 and blood pressure interpretation12 were documented. Blood levels of creatinine, albumin, glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, electrolytes, transaminases and tacrolimus 12-hr C0 were measured. On the day of enrolment, therapy with twice-daily IR-tacrolimus was discontinued and switched to PR-tacrolimus (ODVenta®, Zydus Lifesciences Limited, Ahmedabad, India; available as 0.5 mg and 1 mg capsules) at 1:1 dose equivalence; i.e., one dose of PR-tacrolimus replaced the sum of the two doses of IR tacrolimus that the patient was receiving 12 hours apart. PR-tacrolimus was administered once daily in the morning, 1 hour away from meals, for 6 months. A 24-hour trough C0 was measured after 2 weeks, and the dose titrated to achieve tacrolimus C0 of 3-7 ng/mL.

Concomitant medications

If patients were on therapy with prednisolone at enrolment, the dose was tapered to 0.2 mg/kg on alternate days and continued for the 6-month study duration. Therapy with prednisolone was not initiated in patients who were off prednisolone at enrolment until the disease relapsed. Relapse, defined by nephrotic range proteinuria (3+/4+ by dipstick) for 3 consecutive days, was treated with prednisolone at 2 mg/kg/day until remission (negative or trace proteinuria for 3 days), followed by 1.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 4 weeks, 1.0 mg/kg for 2 weeks, 0.5 mg/kg for 2 weeks, and 0.25 mg/kg for 2 weeks and then stopped. All patients received calcium carbonate (250–500 mg) and vitamin D3 (200–400 IU) daily while on prednisolone therapy. Infections were managed as per unit protocols. Hypertension, defined as systolic or diastolic blood pressure ≥95th percentile for sex, age, and height,12 was treated with enalapril, administered at a dose of 0.3-0.6 mg/kg/day. Drugs that interfere with the bioavailability or pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus were not used [Supplementary Table S2].

Outcomes

The primary outcome of this prospective pilot study was the proportion of patients with stable remission, defined as sustained remission or occurrence of one relapse during the 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes, at 6 months, included the proportions of patients with sustained remission and treatment failure, relapse frequency, C0/TDD, and change in eGFR,10 HbA1c, and total cholesterol between baseline to 6 months or the last follow-up. Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of frequent relapses (≥2 relapses in 6 months), late steroid resistance (non-response to prednisolone at 60 mg/m2 daily for 6 weeks), a serious adverse event (SAE) attributed to the intervention, or ≥2 SAE of any nature. Pharmacogenomic studies included the relationship between CYP3A5 polymorphism c.6986A>G and tacrolimus C0 and C0/TDD at 2 weeks and 6 months in all patients, and AUC0-24 at 2 weeks in a subset.

Follow-up and monitoring

Parents were instructed to examine the first morning urine for protein by dipstick, and record details of proteinuria, medications, infections, and adverse events. Visits were scheduled at 2 weeks; and 2, 4, and 6 months; at relapse; at suspicion of SAE; and at diagnosis of treatment failure. At each visit, records were reviewed and physical examination was performed with attention to vital signs, including blood pressure, anthropometry, signs of infections, relapse, and adverse events. Compliance was assessed by history and the pill count of empty blister pack. Investigations included blood levels of albumin, sodium, potassium and creatinine, blood counts, lipid profile, fasting glucose, HbA1c and magnesium, and spot urine protein and creatinine ratio at baseline and 6-month follow-up. All SAE were reported to the Ethics Committee within 48 hours. Study participation was terminated at treatment failure or at 6-months follow up, whichever was earlier. Subsequent management was as per institutional protocols.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics

Tacrolimus blood levels were measured using liquid chromatographic mass spectroscopy at the 2-week and 6-month follow-ups. The 24-hr C0 for PR-tacrolimus was performed after 2 weeks, and the dose was adjusted to achieve a target C0 of 3-7 ng/mL. The C0 was measured after every 2-weeks of dose change, if required, to escalate dose to a maximum of 0.2 mg/kg/day. C0/TDD was calculated to understand inter-individual variations. TDD was corrected for body surface area of 1.73 m2 to provide C0/TDD values comparable to adults (C0/TDDBSA-Adult).13 In every third patient, AUC0-24 was estimated at 2 weeks using tacrolimus levels at 8 timepoints (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24-hour) in the trapezoid model.14 AUC0-24hr was inspected for maximum tacrolimus concentration (Cmax) and time taken to reach Cmax (tmax).

CYP3A5 polymorphism

All patients underwent testing for the CYP3A5 single-nucleotide polymorphism c.6986A>G using an real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Based on the presence of the functional (A, *1 or wild-type) or non-functional (G, *3 or mutant) alleles; patients were categorized as expressor and rapid metabolizer (genotype AA or *1/*1), expressor and intermediate metabolizer (AG or *1/*3), and non-expressor or poor metabolizer (GG or *3/*3).

Statistical analysis

Information from case record forms was entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Stata 14.2 (2015; Statacorp, New College station, Texas). Continuous data was reported as median (IQR) and compared between- and within groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum and sign rank tests, respectively. Proportions are reported with 95% CI. The incidence of relapse is reported as rate per person-year. p value <0.05 was considered significant.

In absence of literature on remission of nephrotic syndrome using PR-tacrolimus, we assumed that PR-tacrolimus will be as effective in maintaining stable remission in children as IR-tacrolimus.15 Assuming that 95% of patients will show satisfactory remission at 6-month follow-up, at 90% power, allowing for 10% absolute error in the estimate and 10% attrition, 20 patients were required to be enrolled.

Results

Patients

Of 45 patients screened for eligibility, 25 were excluded [Figure 1]; 20 patients were switched to once-daily PR-tacrolimus and followed for 6-months without attrition. Six patients required increase in PR-tacrolimus dose to achieve a target trough between 3-7 ng/mL by 4 weeks. Seven patients underwent AUC0-24hr estimation.

Study flow. CNI: Calcineurin inhibitor.
Figure 1:
Study flow. CNI: Calcineurin inhibitor.

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of enrolled patients, which included more boys (85%) and patients with steroid dependence (60%). Almost two-thirds of patients had received more than two steroid-sparing therapies during a disease lasting median 8 (IQR 5-10.5) years. CNI therapy had been administered for median 19.5 (IQR 8.3-30) months. Five patients had received rituximab prior to IR-tacrolimus, at median (range) of 30 (12-40) months, before switching to PR-tacrolimus. In the 6-months preceding enrolment, the incidence of relapses was 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.4) per person-year; 13 (65%) patients were in sustained remission on IR-tacrolimus.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics in patients with nephrotic syndrome (n=20)
Characteristic Value
Boys 17 (85%)
Steroid dependence 12 (60%)
Age at onset (months) 31 (23.5, 56)
Age at frequent relapses (months) 45 (34, 58)
Age at enrolment (months) 130 (102, 181)
Steroid sparing agents used prior to tacrolimus 3 (2,3)
Prior therapies
 Long-term alternate day prednisolone 9 (45%)
 Levamisole 16 (80%)
 Cyclophosphamide 15 (75%)
 Mycophenolate mofetil 11 (55%)
 Rituximab 5 (25%)
Cumulative exposure to tacrolimus (months) 19.5 (8.5, 30)
Tacrolimus daily dose (mg/kg/day) 0.1 (0.07, 0.11)
Tacrolimus trough concentration (ng/mL) 3.99 (3.50, 5.44)
Relapse rate (per person-year) 0.7 [0.28, 1.44]
Anthropometry standard deviation scores
 Weight -0.23 (-0.87, 0.31)
 Height -1.1 (-1.50, -0.19)
 Body mass index 0.19 (-0.83, 1.29)
Features of steroid toxicity
 Cushingoid features 8 (40%)
 Overweight, obese 4 (20%), 4 (20%)
 Short stature 2 (10%)
 Hypertension, or therapy for hypertension 6 (30%)
 Posterior subcapsular cataract 2 (10%)
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2) 116 (79, 141)
Serum albumin (g/dL) 4.5 (4.2, 4.7)

Data is shown as n (%), median (interquartile range) or mean [95% confidence interval]

Outcomes

In the 6 months following the switch to PR-tacrolimus, ten patients were in sustained remission, and eight experienced one relapse each; two patients with two relapses each were termed frequent relapses. Treatment failure, observed in 3 (15%) patients, was attributed to frequent relapses in these two patients and to late steroid resistance, which followed a relapse in one patient. Hence, 17 (85%) patients had stable remission (no or infrequent relapses), including 10 patients with sustained remission [Table 2]. There was no significant association between the disease course with PR-tacrolimus and that during the therapy with IR-tacrolimus (data not shown).

Table 2: Outcomes at 6-months follow up in patients receiving prolonged release tacrolimus, n=20
Parameter Baseline 6 months Change from baseline1 p
Primary outcome
 Proportion with stable remission (%) 100 [81, 100] 85 [63.1, 95.6] -15 [-30.7, 0.65] 0.12
Secondary outcomes
 Proportion with sustained remission (%) 65 [43.2, 82.1] 50 [29.9, 70.1] -15 [-45.3, 15.3] 0.36
 Proportion with treatment failure (%) 0 [0, 18.9] 15 [4.4, 36.9] 15 [-0.6, 30.7] 0.23
 Incidence of relapses (per person-year) 0.7 [0.28, 1.44] 1.23 [0.63, 2.15] 0.53 [-0.34, 1.40]2 0.24
 Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73m2) 115.9 (79.2, 141.4) 110.3 (86.2, 130.9) 0.5 (-25.6, 5.9) 0.97
 Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) (%) 5.3 (5.0, 5.4) 5.1 (4.8, 5.6) 0 (-0.3, 0.3) 0.87
 Total cholesterol (mg dL) 128 (117.0, 173.5) 135.5(126, 188.5) 4 (-6,26) 0.15
 C0/TDD3 1.54 (1.09, 1.71) 1.02 (0.67, 1.62) -0.14 (-0.47, 0.01) 0.032
 C0/TDD BSA-Adult 3 0.98 (0.69, 1.31) 0.71 (0.41, 1.13) -0.10 (-0.36, 0.04) 0.089

Data is shown as median (interquartile range) and proportion or mean [95% confidence intervals], 1Difference between the values at 6-months and baseline, 2The incidence rate ratio was 1.76 [0.69,4.46], 3C0/TDD, ratio of 24-hr tacrolimus trough level to total daily tacrolimus dose; C0/TDDBSA-Adult, the C0/TDD ratio corrected for adult body surface area, (i.e., dose for 1.73 m2 BSA)

There were no significant changes in eGFR, HbA1c, and total cholesterol from the baseline to the end of study [Table 2]. The incidence (95% CI) of relapses, based on 12 relapses in 117.3 person-months, was 1.23 (0.63, 2.15) per person-year, which was insignificantly higher than the baseline rate (incidence rate ratio 1.76; 95% CI 0.7-4.5; P=0.23). Additional outcomes, not pre-specified, have been shown in Supplementary Table S3.

Supplementary Table S3

Adverse events

Ten adverse events observed in eight children, have been listed in Supplementary Table S4. Upper respiratory tract infection was the most common event in seven patients. There were no SAE and/or events requiring therapy discontinuation. No patient experienced tremors, headaches, seizures, hyperglycemia, or hypomagnesemia. PR-tacrolimus was withheld for one week in one patient who developed AKI stage 2 associated with relapse and hypovolemia; eGFR remained stable after PR-tacrolimus was resumed upon AKI resolution.

Supplementary Table S4

Therapy compliance and pharmacokinetics

PR-tacrolimus was administered at a dose of 0.09 (0.07, 0.14) mg/kg/day, which was similar to the IR-tacrolimus dose at baseline [Table 3]. The compliance to doses was 98.8% (98.3%, 100%). While the C0 and tacrolimus daily dose indexed to body weight were similar between baseline and after 6 months, the C0/TDD declined over 6-months’ follow-up [P=0.032; Supplementary Table S5]; similarly, there was an insignificant decline in the C0/TDD values adjusted for body surface area [C0/TDDBSA-Adult; P=0.089; Supplementary Table S5]. Individual trends for these parameters have been shown in Supplementary Figure S1. In 7 patients, AUC0-24hr was 130.3 (81.6, 158.6) ng*hr/mL, with a Cmax of 10.40 (5.80, 18.30) ng/mL and tmax of 2 hours [Supplementary Table S6; Figure 2]. Both the C0 and Cmax correlated modestly with the AUC0-24hr [Supplementary Figure S2].

Supplementary Table S5

Supplementary Figure S1

Supplementary Table S6

Supplementary Figure S2
Table 3: Comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters between patients with the two genotypes of CYP3A5 single nucleotide polymorphism
Timepoint Pharmacokinetic parameter

Total

(n=20)

*01/*03

(Expressors, n=12)

*03/*03

(Non-expressors, n=8)

P1
At enrolment Daily dose (mg/day) 3.25 (2.25, 4.25) 3.75 (3.0, 5.0) 2.75 (2.0, 3.25) 0.028
Daily dose (mg/kg/day) 0.10 (0.07, 0.11) 0.10 (0.08, 0.16) 0.08 (0.06, 0.10) 0.10
Trough level (C0) (ng/mL) 4.00 (3.50, 5.44) 3.78 (3.20, 5.17) 4.51 (3.58, 5.47) 0.35
C0/TDD2 1.54 (1.09, 1.71) 1.31 (0.78, 1.59) 1.71 (1.40, 2.24) 0.021
C0/TDDBSA-Adult2 0.98 (0.69, 1.31) 0.84 (0.45, 1.13) 1.15 (1.02, 1.70) 0.025
At 2 weeks Daily dose (mg/day) 3.50 (2.25, 5.0) 4.5 (3.25, 5.0) 2.75 (2.0, 3.25) 0.019
Daily dose (mg/kg/day) 0.10 (0.07, 0.11) 0.10 (0.08, 0.19) 0.08 (0.06, 0.10) 0.073
Trough level (C0) (ng/ml) 3.63 (2.72, 4.59) 3.19 (2.50, 4.31) 4.26 (3.49, 5.01) 0.076
C0/TDD2 1.25 (0.62, 1.62) 0.65 (0.52, 1.51) 1.55 (1.18, 2.05) 0.037
C0/TDDBSA-Adult2 0.90 (0.44, 1.24) 0.52 (0.27, 0.99) 1.12 (0.82, 1.34) 0.037
At 6 months Daily dose (mg/day) 3.50 (2.25, 4.75) 4.25 (3.25, 5.0) 2.75 (2.0, 3.25) 0.019
Daily dose (mg/kg/day) 0.09 (.07, 0.14) 0.11 (0.08, 0.23) 0.08 (0.06, 0.10) 0.064
Trough level (C0) (ng/mL) 3.80 (2.91, 4.01) 3.47 (2.62, 3.84) 3.93 (3.56, 4.85) 0.12
C0/TDD2 1.02 (0.67, 1.62) 0.81 (0.51, 1.40) 1.58 (1.02, 1.80) 0.054
C0/TDDBSA-Adult2 0.71 (0.41, 1.13) 0.69 (0.26, 0.83) 1.04 (0.76, 1.25) 0.076
Change from baseline Trough level (C0) (ng/mL) 0.25 (-0.09, 1.71) 0.50 (-0.02, 1.70) 0.15 (-0.91, 1.90) 0.64
C0/TDD2 -0.14 (-0.47, 0.01) -0.26 (-0.39, -0.02) -0.04 (-0.62, 0.19) 0.64
C0/TDDBSA-Adult 2 0.10 (-0.04, 0.36) 0.10 (-0.003,0.25) 0.04 (-0.15,0.46) 0.64

Data is shown as median (interquartile range), 1Depicts P for comparison between expressors and non-expressors, 2C0/TDD ratio of tacrolimus trough to total daily tacrolimus dose; C0/TDDBSA the ratio corrected for adult body surface area (i.e., dose for 1.73 m2 BSA).

Area under the curve (0-24 hours) for 7 children receiving prolonged release tacrolimus. Solid and dashed lines indicate patients with CYP3A5 genotypes *1/*3 (expressors) and *3/*3 (non-expressors), respectively. The shaded area indicates the conventional target range (3-7 ng/mL) for tacrolimus trough in children with nephrotic syndrome.
Figure 2:
Area under the curve (0-24 hours) for 7 children receiving prolonged release tacrolimus. Solid and dashed lines indicate patients with CYP3A5 genotypes *1/*3 (expressors) and *3/*3 (non-expressors), respectively. The shaded area indicates the conventional target range (3-7 ng/mL) for tacrolimus trough in children with nephrotic syndrome.

CYP3A5 polymorphism

Twelve patients were intermediate metabolizers (*01/*03) and eight were poor metabolizers (*03/*03); none had rapid metabolism (*01/*01). Patients with intermediate metabolism had significantly lower C0 at enrolment and 2 weeks and 6 months, as compared to the poor metabolizers [Table 3]. While the C0/TDDBSA-Adult were significantly lower for intermediate metabolizers at enrolment and at 2 weeks, these values were comparable between the groups at 6-months [Table 3].

Discussion

This single-center, prospective, single-limb interventional pilot study showed that the PR-tacrolimus formulation ODVenta®, administered once daily, was effective in sustaining stable remission on the short-term in patients with CNI-dependent steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. The study size was small because of strict eligibility criteria, which limited participation to patients with difficult-to-treat, CNI-dependent, steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in stable remission on therapy with twice-daily conventional IR-tacrolimus for at least 6 months. Only 3 of 20 patients switched to PR-tacrolimus failed therapy. Therapy was safe and without significant adverse events or changes in kidney function or metabolic parameters. Pharmacokinetic data suggested that patients on PR-tacrolimus required higher total daily doses to maintain C0 in the target range, and that CYP3A5 polymorphism influences both the C0 and the daily dose required to maintain it (C0/TDDBSA-Adult).

In the last two decades, tacrolimus has emerged as an important steroid-sparing strategy for patients with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.3,15 Evidence of its safety and efficacy is chiefly from randomized controlled trials in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, where its efficacy was comparable to cyclosporine16 and superior to intravenous cyclophosphamide17 or mycophenolate mofetil.18 While its potency in maintaining remission of both steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome is recognized, the risks of acute and chronic nephrotoxicity, hyperglycemia, and neurotoxicity limit its use. Variable bioavailability of tacrolimus necessitates therapeutic drug monitoring, and the need for twice-daily dosing might be associated with low compliance.

Long-acting (PR) formulations of tacrolimus, which are suitable for once daily administration, have been shown to be associated with satisfactory efficacy and safety in adult and pediatric kidney allograft recipients.5,7,19 A systematic review of 10 observational studies, comparing PR- and IR-tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients, found 30% lower risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year in the former. The allograft survival rates were similar.20 PR- and IR-tacrolimus have shown similar efficacy in adult kidney transplant recipients in prospective studies with prolonged follow-up.7 However, information on the efficacy of PR-tacrolimus for glomerular diseases is lacking. This study reports that PR-tacrolimus has 85% efficacy in maintaining stable remission in pediatric difficult-to-treat, steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, which is comparable to outcomes with IR-tacrolimus15 and confirms the satisfactory response seen in transplant recipients.5,19

While 12-hour C0 is adequately validated to reflect the AUC for IR-tacrolimus, 12- or 24-hour C0 have not been validated for PR-tacrolimus in pediatric glomerular diseases. Three studies on pediatric post-kidney transplant recipients19,21,22 and one study on pediatric nephrotic syndrome23 focused on the pharmacokinetic profile of the agent. The median AUC0-24 in seven patients in our study was similar to that reported in the study in nephrotic syndrome [Supplementary Table S7], but lower than the concentrations in kidney allograft recipients, possibly since higher tacrolimus C0 levels were targeted in the latter context.5,19,2123 The tmax at 2-hours in our patients is similar to previous reports on PR-tacrolimus therapy in children.19,21 The Cmax in our patients was comparable to previous studies with PR-tacrolimus and was lower than that of IR-tacrolimus, which reflects the altered pharmacokinetics.19,21,23

Supplementary Table S7

C0/TDD ratio has been used to indicate the tacrolimus metabolism status of adult participants in pharmacokinetic studies. We calculated C0/TDDBSA-Adult to compare this ratio to available data, and found it comparable with adult as well as pediatric kidney transplant recipients, regardless of CYP3A5 expression status.13,24 There was an insignificant decline in C0/TDDBSA-Adult during the 6-month follow-up, suggesting a higher dose requirement to maintain trough levels. An increase in tacrolimus dose (TDD/C0) and/or a decline in C0/TDD was observed in 55% of 37 and 27% of 11 pediatric kidney transplant recipients.5,25 who were switched to PR-tacrolimus after 3-5 years of stable post-transplant course, as has been reported for adult liver or kidney allograft recipients.26

Factors other than the formulation that influence the pharmacokinetic profile of tacrolimus include age-based variations in P-glycoprotein expression, CYP3A5 enzyme activity, blood levels of plasma binding proteins, and to a smaller extent, hematocrit and serum albumin.27 The pharmacogenomics of tacrolimus influence decisions on tacrolimus dosing. Genotypes based on CYP3A5 polymorphism, 6986A>G, vary by ethnicity and affect tacrolimus metabolism.28 As in our report, 40-50% of Indian subjects are poor metabolizers of tacrolimus.29,30 Similar to our experience, others have reported that the C0, AUC0-24hr and the C0/TDDBSA-Adult differ between patients with intermediate and poor metabolism, which underscores a role for pharmacogenomic profiling before tacrolimus dosing.29,31

This pilot study provides proof-of-concept that PR-tacrolimus is safe and effective for use in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic assessments provided useful guidance for dose equivalence. However, the study’s impact is limited by its small sample size, short follow-up duration and single limb design, which could not examine the non-inferiority or superiority of PR- vs. IR-tacrolimus in sustaining disease remission. We also did not assess patient-reported outcomes, such as preference for PR-tacrolimus in view of less frequent dosing, adherence and cost-benefits. Since information on therapy compliance was not collected before enrolment, a change in adherence pattern, or the Hawthorne effect, cannot be ruled out. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials with longer follow-ups are required to examine the non-inferiority of PR-tacrolimus in inducing and sustaining remission of proteinuria in patients with steroid-resistant and steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

Acknowledgments

Part of the study findings were presented as an oral poster at the Annual Meeting of the Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology held in October 2023 in Kolkata; the abstract was published as part of conference proceedings in Asian J Pediatr Nephrol 2023; 6:185-212.

Financial support & sponsorship

The intervention administered (prolonged release tacrolimus, ODVenta®) was provided free of cost by Zydus Lifesciences Limited, Ahmedabad, India. The sponsors supported the costs of tacrolimus levels (trough, area under the curve) and genotyping for CYP3A5 polymorphism. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. No financial incentives were provided, directly to any of the authors or the institution, prior to or during the study, or subsequently. Support of the Indian Council of Medical Research (5/7/1090/2013-RHN) is acknowledged.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Disease course in steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:881-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Treatment of severe steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in children with tacrolimus. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:1848-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: revised guidelines. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:461-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Polymorphism of the CYP3A5 gene and its effect on tacrolimus blood level. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13:197-200.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation: 1 year after conversion in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Int J Nephrol. 2011;2011:126251.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Graceptor) in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:124-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: Two-year results of phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:648-59.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2023;38:877-919.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:629-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Revised Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2015 growth charts for height, weight and body mass index for 5-18-year-old Indian children. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19:470-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171904.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Age-related differences in rejection rates, infections, and tacrolimus exposure in pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the CERTAIN registry. Kidney Int Rep. 2024;9:3265-77.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , eds. Pharmacokinetics (Second ed). Boca Raton: CRC Press; . Accessed at https://doi.org/10.1201/b14095, last accessed 15 December 2024
  15. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy of rituximab versus tacrolimus in difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: An open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Nephrol. 2022;37:3117-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:760-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Treatment with tacrolimus and prednisolone is preferable to intravenous cyclophosphamide as the initial therapy for children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82:1130-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Mycophenolate mofetil is inferior to tacrolimus in sustaining remission in children with idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2017;92:248-57.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Conversion of twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus formulation in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients: Pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:2191-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Drugs. 2019;79:1947-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable paediatric renal transplant patients and 1-year follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29:117-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Conversion from twice- to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney recipients: A pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29:1081-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Pharmacokinetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in children with primary nephrotic syndrome. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017;49:807-13.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. A Low Tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratio increases calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity and cytomegalovirus infection risks in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center study in Japan. Transplant Proc. 2023;55:109-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Consideration of the switch from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant in daily clinical practice: Pharmacokinetic parameters, patient satisfaction and medical practices. Pediatr Transplant. 2014;18:777-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Tacrolimus trough levels and level-to-dose ratio in stable renal transplant patients converted to a once-daily regimen. Transplant Proc. 2011;43:1024-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic differences between adults and pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. Pharmaceutics. 2010;2:291-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms in different ethnic populations. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005;33:884-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Melding Pharmacogenomic effect of MDR1 and CYP3A5 gene polymorphism on tacrolimus dosing in renal transplant recipients in Northern India. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;5:28-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Evaluation of genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5 in normal healthy participants from western India - A cross-sectional study. Indian J Pharmacol. 2022;54:97-101.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Influence of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of the prolonged-release, once-daily formulation of tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:451-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections