Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letters to Editor
28 (
6
); 492-493
doi:
10.4103/ijn.IJN_439_17

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Creatinine-Based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation

Department for Diabetic Kidney Disease, Prof. M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, M.V. Hospital for Diabetes, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. V. Viswanathan, No. 4, West Madha Church Street, Royapuram, Chennai - 600 013, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: drvijay@mvdiabetes.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Recently, we have been reading articles on estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in Indian population with great interest. With the understanding that there is a rising epidemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the subsequent increase in its associated complications, it poses a nationwide threat. Diabetic nephropathy is the significant cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). An Indian study showed that patients with CKD spend more toward their hospital admission than those without diabetic complications.[1] Hence, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is important for the clinicians to assess the kidney function, detect and estimate the progression of CKD. eGFR using CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation[2] is a major indicator of kidney function, and it plays an important role in detecting, evaluating, and also in managing CKD. Serum creatinine (Scr) or serum cystatin (Scys) is used to estimate GFR. A population-based Indian study emphasized that Cystatin C identifies more patients in early CKD and also in patients with normoalbuminuric CKD when compared to creatinine.[3] This study focused on the creatinine-based equations, such as Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), by comparing it with CKD-EPI equation using Cystatin C. An earlier study by Viswanathan et al.[4] suggested that Cystatin C was a better marker for moderately impaired renal function when compared to creatinine using Cockcroft-Gault. In developing countries like India, use of Cystatin C in clinical practice is limited due to its cost. At present, Cystatin C has an advantage in detecting the early CKD, but it is not a cost-effective test and cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice.

To overcome this limitation, creatinine can be used for eGFR. A recent study in 2017[5] compared the estimation of GFR using gamma camera-based Gates protocol and Scr-based predicting equations with GFR measured by plasma clearance of Tc-99m DTPA in North Indian population. The finding highlighted that CKD-EPI correlated with Tc-99m DTPA and showed least bias and highest precision when compared to GFR estimate using Cockroft-Gault, MDRD, and Gates protocol. Kumpatla et al.[6] compared MDRD equation versus CKD-EPI using Scr and MDRD equation versus CKD-EPI using Scys to estimate eGFR in a clinical setting in South Indian population. The mean bias, mean absolute bias and precision were lesser in MDRD versus CKD-EPI using Scr when compared to that of MDRD versus CKD-EPI using Scys. Likewise, Scr showed highest accuracy when compared with Scys. This showed that creatinine-based CKD-EPI can identify CKD at an early stage. Thus, for an Indian population, CKD-EPI equation using creatinine predicts GFR best than other equations. This underlines the importance of standardization of eGFR calculation among Indian population. Further research is needed in large sample to determine the best methods by comparing eGFR equations with the gold standard methods. In conclusion, CKD-EPI equation using Scr was found to be superior in terms of estimating kidney function and is cost-effective; hence, it can be implemented in the routine clinical practice.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , . Direct costs associated with chronic kidney disease among type 2 diabetic patients in India. Indian J Nephrol. 2014;24:141-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Anew equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Identification and stratification of diabetic kidney disease using serum cystatin C and serum creatinine based estimating equations in type 2 diabetes: A comparative analysis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2015;63:28-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Comparative assessment of cystatin c and creatinine for determining renal function. Indian J Nephrol. 2005;15:91-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in Indian population. Indian J Nephrol. 2017;27:124-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Comparison of two creatinine based equations for routine estimation of GFR in a speciality clinic for diabetes. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65:38-41.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections