Translate this page into:
Gender Disparity in Dialysis Utilization under Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Program in India
Corresponding author: Sourabh Sharma, Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplant, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. E-mail: drsourabh05@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
Dear Editor,
The Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme (PMNDP) was launched by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, under the National Health Mission,1 and has substantially improved the accessibility of dialysis services across the country. As of January 2026, it has reached 759 districts with 1,889 dialysis centers. Overall, 262,444 patients have benefited, and more than 14.4 million dialysis sessions have been delivered.2 Political will, effective administrative coordination, and public-private partnerships have been key to the programme’s success. A closer look at the beneficiary data reveals a gender disparity in dialysis service utilization. Of the 262,444 patients currently benefiting under PMNDP, around 69% (181,089) are males.2 This gender disparity persists despite the program’s broad eligibility criteria. Socio-cultural, structural, economic, and health-system factors contribute to this disparity.3
Delayed diagnosis and referral are the key contributors. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often diagnosed later in women because of reduced healthcare-seeking behavior, under-recognition of symptoms, and limited access to routine screening.4,5 Secondly, the prevailing cultural norms deprioritize women’s health needs compared to those of male earning members.6 The economic dependence and high indirect costs limit access to chronic care for women.6 In rural and suburban regions, women often bear caregiving responsibilities. This limits their ability to attend thrice-weekly dialysis sessions.6 Finally, women have lower access to vascular access creation and follow-up care.4
Targeted gender-responsive interventions are required to improve equity in dialysis access. Table 1 presents potential policy solutions to eliminate gender disparities in dialysis care. It’s time to translate India’s universal dialysis access policy into equitable benefits for both men and women.
| Domain | Observed Challenge | Gender-specific impact | Potential policy solutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| CKD detection | Late diagnosis of CKD in women | Women present at advanced stages, limiting dialysis preparedness | Community-level CKD screening for women via NHM, NCD clinics, and antenatal/postnatal health platforms |
| Health-seeking behavior | Lower prioritization of women’s health | Delayed dialysis initiation | Targeted IEC campaigns emphasizing kidney health in women; involvement of ASHA and ANM workers |
| Economic factors | Indirect costs (travel, nutrition, caregiver time) | Disproportionate burden on women | Travel allowances, nutritional supplementation, and social welfare convergence targeted to women. |
| Mobility & caregiving roles | Difficulty attending regular dialysis sessions | Higher dropout or non-initiation | Flexible dialysis scheduling, satellite centers, and community-based transport support. Promotion of home-based dialysis, such as peritoneal dialysis. |
| Health-system access | Delayed AV fistula creation | Increased use of catheters and complications | Early referral pathways and fast-track access creation for female patients |
| Data & monitoring | Limited sex-disaggregated outcome reporting | Under-recognition of disparity | Routine gender-disaggregated PMNDP dashboards and outcome audits |
PMNDP: Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme, CKD: Chronic kidney disease, NCD: Non-communicable disease, NHM: National Health Mission, IEC: Information, education, and communication, ASHA: Accredited social health activist, ANM: Auxiliary nurse midwife, AV fistula- Arteriovenous fistula, ESKD: End-stage kidney disease.
Author contributions
Contributed equally in conception and design of manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data and final approval of the manuscript: SS, RKC. All authors have contributed as per the ICMJE requirements; read, approved and are responsible for the full content of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
References
- One nation-one dialysis: Breaking barriers, empowering lives. Semin Dial. 2025;38:166-75.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme. Available online: https://pmndp.mohfw.gov.in/en. (Accessed on 25 Jan 2026)
- Gender disparity in hemodialysis practices and mortality: A nationwide cross-sectional observational study. Indian J Nephrol. 2024;34:609-16.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Sex and gender disparities in the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:151-64.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Influence of sex on the progression of chronic kidney disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94:1339-56.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sex and gender disparities in dialysis initiation, modality choice, and outcomes. Kidney Int. 2018;93:12-22.
- [Google Scholar]