Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Trials
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinical Trials
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to the Editor
35 (
6
); 809-810
doi:
10.25259/IJN_237_2025

Improved Detection of HLA-DP Antibodies: Comparative Evaluation of LIFECODES LifeScreen Deluxe and LifeScreen XP in Class II Anti-HLA Antibody Screening

Department of Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Transfusion Medicine (Blood Center), Medanta-The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
Department of Clinical Research, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
Department of Transplant Division, Werfen, India

Corresponding author: Aseem Kumar Tiwari, Department of Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Transfusion Medicine (Blood Center), Medanta-The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India. E-mail: aseemtwr@yahoo.co.in

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mehra S, Tiwari AK, Chauhan R, Bhardwaj G, Rani N, Kashyap S, et al. Improved Detection of HLA-DP Antibodies: Comparative Evaluation of LIFECODES LifeScreen Deluxe and LifeScreen XP in Class II Anti-HLA Antibody Screening. Indian J Nephrol. 2025;35:809-10. doi: 10.25259/IJN_237_2025

Dear Editor,

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor specific antibodies (DSA) detection is crucial in minimizing immunological risk and improving graft outcomes in renal transplantation.1,2 Anti-HLA antibody screening is a critical step prior to confirmatory testing at many transplant immunology laboratories.3 We report a comparative evaluation of two anti-HLA antibody screening kits: LIFECODES LifeScreen Deluxe (LMX) and newer LifeScreen XP (LMXP), in renal transplant recipients.

A total of 70 de-identified archived known anti-HLA antibody-positive (n=52) and negative (n=18) remnant samples from kidney transplant recipients were analyzed using both LMX and LMXP kits. Of these 52 samples, anti-HLA-DP antibodies were identified in four cases. Results of all 70 samples were compared in both LMX and LMXP, against the Luminex Single Antigen Bead (LSA) assay, which was considered the “gold standard” for the current analysis. The comparison of anti-HLA antibody screening results obtained using LMX and LMXP kits with the LSA assay (considered the gold standard) has been illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1: Comparison between anti-HLA antibody screening results of LMX and LMXP kits against LSA assay as the gold standard. Sensitivity of LMXP (62%) is higher than LMX (50%)
Gold standard (LSA DP) Total
P N
LMX P 13 11 24
N 12 34 46
Total 25 45 70
LMXP P 15 12 27
N 10 33 43
Total 25 45 70

P: Positive, N: Negative, LMX: LIFECODES lifescreen deluxe, LMXP: LIFECODES LifeScreen XP, LSA: Luminex single antigen, DP: HLA-DP antibodies.

LMXP showed improved sensitivity (60%) over LMX (52%), particularly in detecting HLA-DP antibodies. LMXP detected three additional positive samples, including two HLA-DP antibody-positive cases that LMX missed, highlighting its enhanced screening capability. This improvement was due to the inclusion of two additional beads (CII06 and CII07) in LMXP, designed specifically for HLA-DP antibody detection. Specificity was slightly higher in LMX (75.56%) compared to LMXP (73.33%). LMXP exhibited superior overall diagnostic performance, with a higher positive likelihood ratio (2.25 vs. 2.13) and better agreement with the gold standard assay (κ = 0.328 vs. 0.278). Both kits use undiluted serum (12.5 μL sample, 5 μL reagent) with comparable incubation times, wash steps, and hands-on time. The primary distinction lies in the expanded bead panel in LMXP, improving HLA-DP antibody detection. A positive result for the LMX and LMXP tests may be caused by antibodies against any one of the three HLA class II antigens (DP, DQ, and DR) or by a combination of these. However, because the SAB assay identifies DR, DQ, and DP antibodies independently, a sample that tests positive for HLA-DQ will not test positive for HLA-DR or DP antibodies. These results support the use of newer LMXP over LMX by virtue of being a more sensitive screening tool in pre-transplant compatibility testing. Confirmatory testing with LSA may be required in patients tested positive by LMXP, before releasing the final pre-transplant compatibility test report.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. High risk of graft failure in patients with anti-HLA antibodies undergoing haploidentical stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;88:1019-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Anti-HLA antibodies after solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;69:319-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Evolution of HLA testing for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Importance of the candidate’s antibody profile for donor selection. Human Immunology. 2022;83:721-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
473

PDF downloads
1,289
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections