Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJN_417_2025

Long-Term Outcomes and Role of Corticosteroids in Biopsy-Proven Acute Interstitial Nephritis

Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India
Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India

Corresponding author: Narayan Prasad, Department of Post Graduate, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, India. E-mail: narayan.nephro@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sharma H, Prasad N, Mohakuda S, Kaul A, Kushwaha RS, Patel MR, et al. Long-Term Outcomes and Role of Corticosteroids in Biopsy-Proven Acute Interstitial Nephritis. Indian J Nephrol. doi: 10.25259/IJN_417_2025

Abstract

Background

The causes of Acute Interstitial Nephritis (AIN) vary in different parts of the world, and data on long-term outcomes from corticosteroid use are limited. We conducted a study to determine causes, treatments, and outcomes of biopsy-proven AIN at our center.

Materials and Methods

We included all biopsy-proven cases of AIN between June 2013 and June 2023. Cases of AIN, biopsy findings, and follow-up outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Out of 4267 biopsies screened, 235 patients had AIN, and after excluding 65 patients, 170 (4%), mean age 53.5 ± 15.5 years, and 129 (75.9%) males were included in the analysis. The causes of AIN included drugs (73.5%), infection-induced AIN (14.1%), crystal-associated AIN (5.8%), unknown causes (4.1%), and snake bites (1.2%). Among drugs, alternative medications (n=40; 23.5%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (n=33; 19.4%), proton pump inhibitors (n=20; 11.8%), and antibiotics (n=15; 8.8%) were the most frequent causes. Corticosteroid use was documented in 121 (71.2%) patients, with 98 (57.6%) showing kidney function recovery and 30 (17.6%) exhibiting self-kidney recovery without corticosteroid (p=0.01) over a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR=3, 44). Median eGFR at 3 months, dialysis dependency, and short and long-term outcomes were better in the corticosteroid treatment group than in the non-treatment group.

Conclusion

AIN is most frequently associated with drugs, with alternative medicines being the most common. Corticosteroid use impacts short and long-term outcomes of AIN.

Keywords

Acute interstitial nephritis
Acute kidney injury
Corticosteroids
Long-term outcomes
Recovery

Introduction

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) caused by acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is often missed, and clinical diagnosis depends on a biopsy.1 Drugs have been the most common culprit of AIN.2-5 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors are common causes of AIN.6 Metabolic AIN is seen with deposition of specific crystals in kidney tissue.7

There are limited data on the long-term outcomes of biopsy-confirmed AIN and on the specific substances causing it in this region. Most studies are in the form of case series,8 and short follow-up.9,10 Traditional drugs are also frequently associated with AIN.11-13 Moreover, there is a lack of data on the long-term outcomes of AIN associated with these agents. A recent systematic review concluded that more data are needed to support the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of AIN.14 We studied the clinical presentation, laboratory features, possible causal association, histopathological patterns, long-term outcomes, and response to immunosuppressive therapy in biopsy-proven AIN.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively collected medical records of patients with AIN biopsied between June 2013 and June 2023 from the hospital information system (HIS) [Figure 1]. We retrieved demographic and clinical information, including age at presentation, sex, relevant medical history, drug intake, alternative medications, hospitalizations, laboratory parameters, urinalysis, kidney replacement therapy (KRT), biopsy findings, immunosuppressive therapy, treatment response, follow-up KRT, kidney recovery, and patient survival. Patients <18 years old and those with systemic diseases such as IgG4-related disease, SLE, Sjogren’s, sarcoidosis, and paraproteinemia-associated AIN were excluded due to differences in course and treatment. The study was approved by the institute’s ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

STROBE flow chart of the study. AIN: Acute interstitial nephritis, ESKD: End stage kidney disease
Figure 1:
STROBE flow chart of the study. AIN: Acute interstitial nephritis, ESKD: End stage kidney disease

Histological examination

Kidney biopsies were evaluated by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy if indicated. At least 2 histopathologists (MJ, VA, and PP) reviewed all kidney biopsies, and the diagnosis was made by consensus in the event of any dispute. The degree of inflammatory infiltrates and types of cells were noted. Interstitial inflammation and presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were graded semiquantitatively by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) , periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), silver and trichrome stains as follows: Grade 0 (no): ≤10%; Grade 1 (mild): 10-25%; Grade 2 (moderate): 25-≤50%; Grade 3 (severe): >50%. This classification represents the involvement of non-scarred cortical area by mononuclear cell infiltration and is analogous to the Banff interstitial inflammation scores for kidney allograft rejection.15,16

Patients were followed until their last visit to the outpatient clinics or the hospital, up to July 2023. The outcome and treatment for each patient were evaluated. AKI and CKD were defined and staged according to the KDIGO criteria17,18. AKI was considered fully recovered if the patient achieved the baseline serum creatinine within 3 months. Partial recovery was defined as a fall in the AKI stage over 3 months, but it did not reach the baseline values. No change in the AKI stage over 3 months was defined as non-recovery.19 The need for dialysis was also recorded. .

Treatment protocol

Patients with mild-moderate AIN were treated with prednisolone at 0.5 mg/kg, and those with severe AIN were treated with a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight for 2 weeks. After that, prednisolone was reduced by 25% every 2 weeks and stopped by 8-12 weeks. Patients with dialysis-requiring AKI, KDIGO AKI stage 3, serum creatinine > 4 mg/dL, patients with oliguria and biopsy findings of dense inflammatory infiltrate ( >50% of cortical surface area) were considered as severe AIN and the rest were categorized as mild-moderate AIN. Patients with active infection, who were already recovering at presentation, and those with severe IFTA on histological examination were not given immunosuppression.

Statistical analysis

The normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Parametric data were presented as mean±SD and compared using students’ t-tests. Non-parametric data were expressed in median (IQR) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were represented as percentages and analyzed using the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test per the required application. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the development of ESKD with independent variables age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, and corticosteroid therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to compare patient and kidney survival probability between patients who received steroids and those who did not. The death of the patient was considered an event in patient survival analysis, and the ESKD was regarded as an event in kidney survival analysis. A log-rank test was used to compare the survival between the groups. Patients who did not experience the event of interest during follow-up were censored at the date of last known contact. Cases lost to follow-up were censored at their last documented clinic visit. No imputation was performed for missing event times, and only available data were used. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.

Results

A total of 4267 biopsies were screened, and AIN accounted for 5.6% of the biopsies (n=235) during the study period. The clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters are presented in Table 1. A total of 65 cases with systemic and autoimmune diseases were excluded. Thus, 170 AIN patients (age 53.5 ± 15.5 years) and 129 (75.9%) males were included in the study for analysis. The median time from symptom onset to kidney biopsy was 22 (IQR 6-32) days. At presentation, 44 patients (25.9%) had diabetes mellitus, and 67 (39.4%) had hypertension. The common symptoms included nausea or vomiting (78.2%), oliguria (58.8%), fever (50%), pedal edema (20%), joint pain (15.3%), and skin rashes (9.4%). AKI was the most common presentation observed in 151 patients (88.8%), while 15 patients (8.8%) had a subacute onset, rapidly progressive renal failure (RPRF) like presentation. Four patients (2.4%) had either proteinuria or persistent pyuria with normal serum creatinine at the time of biopsy. Upon admission, dialysis was required in 72 patients (42.4%).

Table 1: Clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of the study population
Parameter n = 170
Age (years) 53.5 ± 15.5
Sex
 Male 129 (75.9)
 Female 41 (24.1)
Co-morbidities
 Diabetes 44 (25.9)
 Hypertensives 67 (39.4)
Symptoms
 Nausea or vomiting 133 (78.2)
 Oliguria 100 (58.8)
 Fever 85 (50)
 Pedal edema 34 (20)
 Joint pain 26 (15.3)
 Skin rashes 16 (9.4)
Syndromic presentation
 Acute kidney injury 151 (88.8)
 Rapidly progressive kidney failure 15 (8.8)
 Normal kidney function (either proteinuria or persistent pyuria) 4 (2.4)
Laboratory parameters
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 9.9 ± 1.7
 Eosinophils (cells/µL)
 <500 125 (73.5)
 >500 45 (26.5%)
 Serum albumin (g/dL) 3.5 ± 0.6
 24-hour urine protein (g/d) 2.7 ± 1.2
 Nephrotic range proteinuria (>3.5 g/d) 16 (9.4)
 Sub-nephrotic proteinuria (<3.5 g/d) 154 (90.6)
Urinalysis [Median (Min-Max)]
 pH 6.5 (5, 8)
 Specific gravity 1.010 (1.002, 1.014)
 Proteinuria on dipstick 2 (0, 4)
 WBC (cells/HPF) 20 (2, 100)
 RBC (cells/HPF) 10 (0, 40)
 Granular casts 5
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
 At biopsy 5.8 (3.9, 7.8)
 3 months 2.2 (1.2, 3.6)
 End of follow-up 1.8 (0.9, 2.8)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2)
 At biopsy 10.9 (7.5, 17.2)
 3 months 33.1 (18.6, 45.9
 End of follow-up 42.2 (20.3, 65.9)
Kidney replacement therapy
 Admission 72 (42.4)
 Follow-up 32 (18.8)
Corticosteroid therapy
 Yes 121(71.2)
 No 49 (28.8)
Status at end of follow-up
 Live 139 (81.8)
 Died 31 (18.2)

Laboratory parameters

At the time of presentation, the mean hemoglobin value of the cohort was 9.9 ± 1.7 g/dL, with 99 patients (58.2%) having hemoglobin < 10 g/dL. Eosinophilia (>500 cells/µL) was observed in 45 patients (25.6%). Nephrotic range proteinuria (>3.5 g/day) was seen in 16 patients (9.4%), while sub-nephrotic proteinuria was noted in 154 patients (90.6%). Our cohort had a 24-hour urine protein of 2.7 ± 1.2 g/day, and serum albumin 3.5 ± 0.6 g/dL.

Etiology of AIN

The main causes of AIN have been outlined in Supplementary Table. Drug-induced AIN was the most common cause, accounting for 73.5% of all cases. Alternative medicines were associated with AIN in 23.5% of cases, NSAIDs in 19.4%, PPIs in 11.8%, antibiotics in 8.8%, antituberculosis medicines in 4.1%, and antiviral drugs in 1.8% of cases. Infection was associated with AIN in 14.1% of cases.

Supplementary Table

Treatment

The clinical characteristics of the patients with and without corticosteroid therapy have been shown in Table 2. A higher proportion of males and hypertensive patients received corticosteroid therapy. A significantly lower IF/TA and glomerulosclerosis were observed in patients who had not received corticosteroid therapy. Grade of inflammation was not different between the groups. Patients with ongoing evidence of active infection (n=10), initially showing rapid recovery of kidney function at presentation (n=34), and severe IFTA (n=5) with mild inflammation were not given corticosteroid therapy. Treatment details have been shown in Figure 1. Prednisolone was administered to 121 patients (71.2%), of whom 98 (81%) recovered. Thirty-nine (22.9%) received 0.5 mg/kg/day, and 82 (48.2%) received 1 mg/kg/day.

Table 2: Clinical characteristics of the patients with and without corticosteroid therapy
Characteristics Corticosteroid therapy (n=121) No corticosteroid therapy (n=49) p-value
Age 52.9 ±15.5 55.6±15.6 0.36
Sex (male) 101 (83.4) 28 (57.1) 0.004
Diabetes mellitus 32 (26.4) 13 (26.5) 0.98
Hypertension 55 (44.4) 12 (24.5) 0.02
Creatinine at biopsy 6.02 ±2.57 5.78±2.33 0.62
Serum albumin 3.5±0.69 3.57±0.63 0.69
Admission to biopsy (days) 7.46±4.2 9.2±6.5 0.05
Kidney biopsy
 Glomeruli number 11.6 ± 5.6 12.61± 6.091 0.35
 Globally sclerosed glomeruli (%) 19.3 ± 17.6 31.1 ± 28.9 0.001
Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy 0.001
 No/Mild 88 (72.3) 14 (28.6)
 Moderate/severe 31 (25.6) 30 (61.2)
 Severe 2 (1.65) 5 (10.2)
Inflammation 0.21
 No/mild 33 (27.3) 9 (18.4)
 Moderate 71 (58.7) 34 (69.4)
 Severe 17 (14.0) 6 (12.2)
Mean follow-up (months, min-max) 31 (3-126) 37 (3-130) 0.11

Corticosteroid therapy was started after a median duration of 4 weeks (IQR 2, 6.5 weeks) after the onset of symptoms. It was started earlier in the recovery group (3.3 ± 2.1 weeks) compared to the non-recovery group (4.7 ± 4.4 weeks, p= 0.03). The median duration of corticosteroid therapy was 8 weeks (5 days, 12 weeks). However, there was no difference in the total duration of corticosteroid treatment between recovery (10.5 ± 6.4 weeks) and the non-recovery group (12.1 ± 10.7 weeks; p=0.08). A total of 49/121 patients required dialysis after admission, and 17 (14.05%) remained dialysis dependent during follow-up despite receiving corticosteroid therapy. In the corticosteroid treatment group, 33.3% of patients required KRT on follow-up (p=0.01). In the corticosteroid non-treatment group, comprising 49 patients (23 of whom required dialysis at admission), 30 (61.2%) showed signs of recovery, and 19 (38.8%) did not. Within this group, 15/23 patients (65.2%) who required dialysis remained dialysis-dependent on follow-up.

On follow-up, median eGFR at 3 months in the steroid-treatment group (42.3 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 23.4, 56.7) was more than that in the non-corticosteroid treatment group (30.8 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR18.2, 48.6), p=0.03; while there was no statistically significant difference of eGFR between the groups on end of follow up of 56.3 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 25.6, 60.4) vs. 41.8 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 19.8, 52.6) (p=0.08) between the patients who received or did not receive corticosteroid treatment.

Long-term outcomes

The median follow-up was 13 (3, 44) months. At the last follow-up, a total of 32 patients developed ESKD, 17 (14%) in the corticosteroid and 15 (30.6%) in the non-corticosteroid groups (p=0.01), respectively. Similarly, the steroid-treatment group showed longer kidney survival (101.0 months,95% CI (90.08-111.96) vs. 91.3 months, 95% CI (63.32- 119.3) months (p=0.029).

A total of 31 (18.2%) patients, 17 (14.04%) in the corticosteroid treatment group, and 14 (28.5%) in the non-corticosteroid treatment group died (p=0.03). The causes of death in these patients were sepsis related to lower respiratory tract infections (n=16), catheter-related bloodstream infection (n=10), coronary artery disease (n=4), and pulmonary embolism (n=1). The mean patient survival was higher in the steroid-treatment group (105 months, 95% CI (95.37-114.72 months) compared to the non-steroid treatment group (99.5 months 95% CI (67.03-132.1 months); (p=0.01). The 1-,3-,5-, and 10-year patient survival in the steroid treatment group were 88.1%, 86.45, 80.3% and 80.3%; and in the non-treatment group were 82.4%, 55.1%, 55.1%, and 44.1%, respectively.

Clinical, laboratory and histological parameters affecting kidney function recovery

The recovery of kidney function, influenced by various laboratory and clinical parameters, has been outlined in Table 3. The urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at follow-up and corticosteroid therapy affected kidney function recovery (p=0.05). The histopathological lesions affecting kidney recovery have been shown in Table 4. The percentage of globally sclerosed glomeruli was lower in the recovery group (p= 0.05). The severity of IFTA was associated with non-during recovery (p=0.001). The presence of eosinophilic infiltrate (p=0.04) and lymphocytic (p=0.03) favored recovery. However, the degree of inflammation did not affect the recovery (p=0.85).

Table 3: Correlation of clinical variables according to the outcome of patients studied
Factors Recovery (n=128) No recovery (n=42) p-value
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 0.20
 <10 68 (53.1) 31 (73.8)
 >10 60 (46.9) 11 (26.2)
Eosinophils (cells/µL) 0.32
 <500 95 (74.2) 30 (71.4)
 >500 33 (25.8) 12 (28.6)
Serum albumin (g/dL) 0.87
 <3.5 58 (45.3) 20 (47.6)
 >3.5 70 (54.7) 22 (53.4)
24-hour urine protein (g/day) 0.54
 <3.5 117 (91.4) 37 (88.1)
 >3.5 11 (8.6) 5 (11.9)
UPCR at admission (mg/g) 0.20
 <2 54 (42.2) 13 (30.9)
 >2 74 (57.8) 29 (69.1)
UPCR at follow-up (mg/g) 0.001
 <2 118 (92.2) 27 (64.3)
 >2 10 (7.8) 15 (35.7)
eGFR at admission (mL/min/1.73m2) 0.109
 <25 108 (84.3) 40 (95.2)
 >25 20 (15.7) 2 (4.8)
pH 0.59
 <6.5 54 (42.2) 20 (47.6)
 >6.5 74 (57.8) 22 (52.4)
WBC (cells/HPF) 0.35
 <5 81 (63.3) 30 (71.4)
 >5 47 (36.7) 12 (28.6)
Corticosteroid therapy 0.01
 Yes 98 (76.5) 23 (54.8%)
 No 30 (23.5) 19 (45.2%)
Corticosteroid dose 0.62
 Half dose (0.5 mg/kg) 33 (25.8) 6 (14.3)
 Full dose (1 mg/kg) 65 (50.8) 17 (40.5)
Mean duration of initiation of corticosteroid therapy after onset of symptoms 3.3 ± 2.1 4.7 ± 4.4 0.03
Total duration of therapy (weeks) 10.5 ± 6.4 12.1 ± 10.7 0.09

UPCR: Urine protein creatinine ratio, eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate

Table 4: Histopathological analysis of AIN
Parameter Recovery (n=128) No recovery (n=42) p-value
Total glomeruli 11.8 ± 5.5 11.6 ± 6.1 0.06
Globally sclerosed glomeruli (%) 19.3 ± 17.6 31.1 ± 28.9 0.001
IFTA 0.001
 No/Mild 88 (68.7) 14 (33.3)
 Moderate 38 (29.7) 24 (57.2)
 Severe 2 (1.6) 4 (9.5)
Inflammation 0.85
 No/mild 33 (25.8) 9 (21.4)
 Moderate 78 (60.9) 27 (64.3)
 Severe 17 (13.3) 6 (14.3)
Cells
 Eosinophil 23 (18) 2 (4.8) 0.04
 Lymphocytes 77 (60.2) 17 (40.5) 0.03
 Polymorph 54 (42.2) 14 (33.3) 0.36
 Plasma cells 51 (39.8) 8 (19) 0.15

AIN: Acute interstitial nephritis, IFTA: Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy

Factors predicting the development of ESKD

Corticosteroid therapy, glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy were independently associated with the development of ESKD. The serum creatinine at time of kidney biopsy showed a trend towards association with ESKD (p=0.057). The age, sex, interstitial infiltrate, and diabetes mellitus, and time of admission to kidney biopsy and treatment were not associated with the development of ESKD [Table 5].

Table 5: Multivariate logistic regression analysis predicting ESKD on follow-up
Parameter Sig. Adjusted Odds Ratio 95% C.I.
Lower Upper
Age 0.584 0.991 0.96 1.02
Diabetes (non-diabetic) 0.112 2.530 0.80 7.94
Corticosteroid therapy (no therapy) 0.000 0.160 0.05 0.44
Global sclerosis (<25 vs. more) 0.027 0.860 0.75 0.98
Sex (male vs. female) 0.410 0.625 0.20 1.91
IFTA (< 25% vs. more) 0.044 9.510 1.06 85.30
Interstitial infiltrate (< 25% vs. more) 0.722 0.765 0.175 3.34
Admission to biopsy time and treatment 0.285 1.05 0.955 1.16
Creatinine at time of biopsy 0.057 0.82 0.67 1.00

ESKD: End-stage kidney disease, IFTA: Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy

Discussion

In this study, AIN accounted for 5.6% of total biopsies performed during the study period, with drugs dominating as the most common etiological factor. Medications associated with AIN remain prevalent worldwide in different studies as well,20 with antibiotics being the most common culprit, followed by NSAIDs. A distinctive finding in our study was that alternative medicines emerged as the leading cause of drug-associated AIN, reflecting the increasing use of alternative medicines driven by sociocultural beliefs that they are natural and free of adverse effects, in contrast to allopathic drugs10,12,13,20. However, the association of alternative and herbal therapies with CKD is known,21 and it constitutes one-fourth of the drugs causing AIN in our cohort. This trend became more evident after the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased consumption of alternative and herbal medications to boost immunity, driven by their easy availability, cultural acceptance, and low cost.22,23 These agents also precipitated metabolic AIN, as evidenced by kidney biopsy findings of oxalate and uric acid crystals in the patients, similar to observations in other studies.24-26

Polypharmacy is another risk factor associated with AIN, affecting mainly the elderly and males.27 In our cohort, 75.9% patients were males, and 40% were elderly. Male predominance may be related to hormonal influences, increased environmental, and occupational risk factors and healthcare-seeking behaviour. Additionally, hormones can also influence kidney function recovery.28 The relatively lower incidence of AIN in our cohort compared with some published series may be attributed to the inclusion of only biopsy-proven cases. Kidney biopsies were performed primarily in patients with delayed presentation or delayed recovery of kidney function, where a definitive diagnosis was required. Consequently, the clinical and laboratory presentations were heterogeneous, reflecting diverse underlying causes and immune mechanisms.29 The classical triad of fever, rash, and eosinophilia, traditionally associated with allergic drug-induced AINwas observed in only 2.9% of patients with antibiotic-related AIN, consistent with contemporary literature reporting its infrequent occurrence.20,28 The majority had sub-nephrotic proteinuria , with only 10% showing nephrotic-range proteinuria.30,31 and dialysis requirement was observed in 42.8% of patients, a finding consistent with a previous study.32

Beyond withdrawal of the offending agent, corticosteroids play an important role in promoting kidney recovery and improving survival.33 Inflammatory injury in AIN typically begins within 7–10 days of exposure to the causative agent, and early initiation of corticosteroid may limit irreversible tubulointerstitial damage.11,12,33 . In our cohort, patients treated with corticosteroids demonstrated better early recovery of kidney function, higher eGFR at 3 months, and a reduced need for dialysis during follow-up. However, there was no statistically significant difference in eGFR between steroid-treated and non-treated groups at the end of follow-up, a finding consistent with previous reports.6,3337 This lack of sustained benefit may be explained by delayed presentation and delayed initiation of corticosteroid therapy in our cohort.

Despite known adverse effects, including an increased risk of infections,30 patients receiving corticosteroids showed better kidney patient survival. Early recovery of kidney function likely contributed to these favorable outcomes. Previous studies have shown that early corticosteroid therapy may halt progression to chronic injury,31 as interstitial fibrosis can develop within as little as three weeks of persistent inflammation. In our study, corticosteroids were initiated based on biopsy findings despite delayed presentation, with a median treatment duration of 2 to 6 weeks.10,32,34 Delays were largely due to late referral to a tertiary centre and the time required for definitive diagnosis. Nevertheless, 57.6% of patients showed partial or complete recovery with corticosteroid therapy, and 66.7% of treated patients avoided long-term dialysis dependency. This favorable response may reflect patient selection based on histopathological features, including lower degrees of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, fewer globally sclerosed glomeruli, and the presence of eosinophilic and lymphocytic infiltrates, features commonly associated with drug-induced AIN and better prognosis.38 Importantly, our study also highlights the role of corticosteroids in metabolic AIN, where crystal-induced inflammation may be reversible. Among patients with metabolic AIN, 70% recovered kidney function, and 20% became dialysis-independent following corticosteroid therapy. Despite a substantial proportion of patients having diabetes and delayed presentation, corticosteroid use was associated with improved kidney and patient survival without increasing mortality.

The major strengths of this study are a large cohort of biopsy-proven AIN cases and long-term follow-up, with insight into outcomes following corticosteroid therapy. Limitations include its retrospective design, lack of standardized criteria for steroid initiation, incomplete documentation of alternative medicine constituents, and delayed presentation, limiting assessment of early treatment effects. Immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated AIN is common39,40, and was an unusual finding in the present study due to the limited development of medical oncology services at the institute.

In conclusion, drugs remain the leading cause of AIN, with alternative medicines emerging as a major contributor. Kidney biopsy is essential for accurate diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making, particularly when clinical features are nonspecific. Corticosteroid therapy facilitates kidney recovery, dialysis-free survival, and improved patient outcomes, even when initiated late. Consideration of geographical, cultural, and social factors is crucial for identifying causative agents, and early histopathological evaluation may guide timely initiation of therapy.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the contributions of the technical staff of the pathology and nephrology departments in assisting with data collection and completing the study.

Author contributions

HS: Writing manuscript, collecting data; NP: Conceptualized the study, wrote and edited the manuscript; SM: Collected data; AK: Clinical care of patients, and editing of the manuscript; RSK: Clinical care and editing; MRP: Design of the study and proof reading; MB: Collected data, proofreading of the manuscript; PP: Histological analysis of biopsy; MJ: Histological analysis of biopsy; VA: Histological analysis of biopsy.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology

The authors declare that no generative AI or AI-assisted tools were used in drafting, editing, or preparing this manuscript.

References

  1. . Diagnosing drug-induced AIN in the hospitalized patient: A challenge for the clinician. Clin Nephrol. 2014;81:381-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis: Pathology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2015;9:3-13.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Drug-induced nephropathies. Histopathology. 2017;70:94-108.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Mechanisms of drug-induced interstitial nephritis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017;24:64-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , eds. Heptinstall’s pathology of the kidney (6th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; . [Last accessed 2024 Jan 9]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Acute interstitial nephritis: Clinical features and response to cortisol corticosteroid therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc.. 2004;19:2778-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Crystal nephropathies: Mechanisms of crystal-induced kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13:226-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Acute interstitial nephritis due to proton pump inhibitors. Indian J Nephrol. 2013;23:304-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Evaluation of clinical and histological prognostic markers in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Ren Fail. 1996;18:97-104.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis: A clinicopathological study and comparative trial of corticosteroidregimens. Indian J Nephrol. 2015;25:281-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Drug-induced acute kidney injury: A clinico-etiological study from a tertiary care center in Northeast India. J Nat Nature Sci Med. 2024;7:284-92.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Heavy metal poisoning from Ayurvedic traditional medicines: An emerging problem? IJENVH. 2008;2:463.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. . Herbal medicines. New Delhi: APH Publishing; . p. :284.
  14. , , , . A systematic review of treatment for acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int Rep. 2025;10:2575-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  15. . Diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection: Banff classification and beyond. Kidney Res Clin Pract.. 2020;39:17-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Systematic Histological Scoring Reveals More Prominent Interstitial Inflammation in Myeloperoxidase-ANCA Compared to Proteinase 3-ANCA Glomerulonephritis. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1231.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Back-calculating baseline creatinine with MDRD misclassifies acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1165-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  18. . KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:c179-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. . KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105:S117-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Kidney recovery after acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:855-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. COVID-19: Is there evidence for the use of herbal medicines as adjuvant symptomatic therapy? Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:581840.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Complementary and alternative medicines use in COVID-19: A global perspective on practice, policy and research. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022;18:2524-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Changes in the aetiology, clinical presentation and management of acute interstitial nephritis, an increasingly common cause of acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1472-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. . Herbal medicines and chronic kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010;15 Suppl 2:10-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . “Green smoothie cleanse” Causing acute oxalate nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. 2018;71:281-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Oxalate nephropathy due to “juicing”: Case report and review. Am J Med. 2013;126:768-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Secondary oxalate nephropathy: A systematic review. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;3:1363-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Clinical characteristics, causes and outcomes of acute interstitial nephritis in the elderly. Kidney Int. 2015;87:458-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Gender and kidney insufficiency: Opportunities for their therapeutic management? Cells. 2022;11:3820.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  30. . Clinical approach to diagnosing acute and chronic tubulointerstitial disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017;24:57-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Acute interstitial nephritis: Clinical features and response to corticosteroid therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:2778-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Early corticosteroid treatment improves the recovery of kidney function in patients with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2008;73:940-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , . Acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2010;77:956-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Long-term outcome in biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis treated with steroids. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:233-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in Scotland. QJM. 2015;108:527-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis, treatment with corticosteroidand impact on kidney outcomes. Nephrol Carlton Vic. 2012;17:748-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , . Steroids: Pharmacology, complications, and practice delivery issues. Ochsner J. 2014;14:203-7.
    [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , . Clinicopathological characteristics of drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis and role of steroids in management: A single-center observational study. World J Nephrol Urol. 2022;11:24-30.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , . Acute Kidney Injury Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Kidney Dis (Basel). 2022;8:190-201.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , . Biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis associated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib: a class effect? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:673-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections