Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Media & News
Nephrology in India
Notice of Corrigendum
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Patient’s Voice
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Images in Nephrology
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJN_127_2026

Phaeohyphomycosis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient

Department of Nephrology, Kidney Health Clinic, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Corresponding author: Doddi Prabhakar, Department of Nephrology, Kidney Health Clinic, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. E-mail: prabhakar.pgimer@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

A 60-year-old male farmer underwent living-related kidney transplantation 13 months ago, with his wife as the donor. Induction therapy included basiliximab (total dose, 40 mg), followed by maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.

He presented with a painless, ulcerated exophytic lesion with areas of necrosis over the plantar aspect of the left great toe [Figure 1a]. At presentation, graft function was stable (serum creatinine, 1.2 mg/dL), and the tacrolimus trough (C₀) level was 7.7 ng/mL.

(a) Ulcerated, exophytic lesion with necrosis on the plantar aspect of the left great toe (white arrow). (b) Hematoxylin and eosin stain (400x) showing a suppurative abscess (orange arrow), pigmented septate hyphae and yeast-like forms (pink arrows), and a multinucleated giant cell (green arrow).
Figure 1:
(a) Ulcerated, exophytic lesion with necrosis on the plantar aspect of the left great toe (white arrow). (b) Hematoxylin and eosin stain (400x) showing a suppurative abscess (orange arrow), pigmented septate hyphae and yeast-like forms (pink arrows), and a multinucleated giant cell (green arrow).

Excision biopsy revealed mixed inflammatory infiltrates, areas of necrosis, and pigmented fungal elements [Figure 1b], consistent with phaeohyphomycosis. Systemic involvement was excluded. Treatment with oral voriconazole (200 mg twice daily) was initiated, and the tacrolimus dose was adjusted.

Phaeohyphomycosis is an uncommon fungal infection caused by dematiaceous fungi and occurs predominantly in immunocompromised individuals.1 Cutaneous lesions frequently mimic neoplasms or chronic infections, often resulting in delayed diagnosis.2 The hallmark of this infection is its filamentous morphology; unlike chromoblastomycosis, which presents as round, thick-walled “copper penny” sclerotic bodies, phaeohyphomycosis features distinct hyphal elements that are visible without special stains due to their innate melanin.3 Management involves surgical excision combined with systemic antifungal therapy.4

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

The authors declare that no generative AI or AI-assisted tools were used in drafting, editing, or preparing this manuscript.

References

  1. , , , . Phaeohyphomycosis: A 10-year study from a tertiary care center in South India. Cureus. 2024;16:e67718.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis: A clinical mimic of skin and soft tissue neoplasms—a descriptive study from India. World J Surg. 2018;42:3861-67.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Chromoblastomycosis: An overview of clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment. Med Mycol. 2009;47:3-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Treatment of subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis and prospective follow-up of 17 kidney transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:977-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
570

PDF downloads
663
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections