Advertisment

Indian Journal of Nephrology About us |  Subscription |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 Home | Current Issue | Archives| Ahead of print | Search |Instructions |  Editorial Board  

Users Online:866

Official publication of the Indian Society of Nephrology

Ahead of print articles
LETTER TO EDITOR
Ahead of print publication  

An unusual cause of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome relapse


1 Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
2 Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

Date of Submission09-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance20-Feb-2021
Date of Web Publication05-Jan-2022

Correspondence Address:
Mehmet Mert,
Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_384_20



How to cite this URL:
Mert M, Ceri M, Yuksel S, Dursun B. An unusual cause of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome relapse. Indian J Nephrol [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2022 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.indianjnephrol.org/preprintarticle.asp?id=335006

Dear Editor,

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal impairment and is a rare variant of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). This disease is caused by hyperactivation of the alternative complement pathway due to overactivation of C3 convertases and loss of complement regulatory mechanisms, and abnormalities of the complement pathway may be in the form of mutations in key complement genes or autoantibodies against specific complement factors. The disease has been triggered by pregnancy, viral illness, and sepsis among other causes; approximately 30% of aHUS results from unknown mechanisms. Regardless of the cause, aHUS is a rare disorder with poor clinical outcomes, and higher morbidity and mortality than infection-associated typical HUS.[1] We herein present a case of aHUS relapsing after oral contraceptive (OC) usage in patient who discontinued eculizumab therapy.

A 21-year-old female patient presented with the complaints of nausea, vomiting, and icterus 4 years ago. The kidney biopsy of the patient, who had acute kidney injury (AKI), oliguria, hematuria, and proteinuria, was compatible with TMA. ADAMTS13 activity was normal and shiga toxin-producing escherichia coli (STEC) was not detected in fecal culture. Complement factor H (CFH) p.Arg1215Gly (c.3643C>G) and p.Glu936Asp (c. 2808G>T) heterozygous, and CFHR5 p.Lys144Asn (c.432A>T) heterozygous gene mutations were detected in the patient, who was considered as aHUS. Treatment of 900 mg eculizumab was given once a week for 4 weeks, and hemodialysis was required twice a week for the first 3 weeks. The clinical and laboratory values of the patient then returned to normal and 1200 mg eculizumab treatment was continued every 2 weeks. However, the patient discontinued eculizumab treatment approximately 2 years ago and then presented with nausea, vomiting, and oliguria at our hospital 4 years after the first diagnosis and treatment. The physical examination was normal, with the exception of blood pressure of 150/90 mmHg. The laboratory test values are shown in [Table 1]. The C3-C4, ANA, and ANCA values were normal. The patient had proteinuria and hematuria, and in the peripheral blood smear, several schistocytes were observed in each area. The patient was evaluated as aHUS recurrence. Hemodialysis support was given as the patient was symptomatic and oliguric, and eculizumab treatment was started at 900 mg/week for 4 weeks at the same time. Treatment was then continued at 1200 mg every 2 weeks. The patient was questioned about her drugs to be able to understand the cause of relapse. It was learned that she had been using OCs for the last 15 days because of menstrual irregularities. Apart from OC usage, no drug use, focus of infection, or stress status could be detected. Clinical and laboratory improvement was achieved with eculizumab treatment. The laboratory values of the patient, who did not need hemodialysis before discharge, are shown in [Table 1]. Hematuria and proteinuria were completely resolved. The patient was evaluated as aHUS relapse due to the use of OC and remission was achieved again with eculizumab treatment, and the patient was discharged without any problems.
Table 1: The course of blood samples

Click here to view


Eculizumab treatment has been reported to significantly decrease the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from 60–70% to 15–20% in patients with aHUS.[2] The optimal treatment strategy is unknown. There is no evidence to support the need for lifelong therapy. Limiting the initial treatment period to 3 months in carefully evaluated patients with native kidney aHUS and withholding prophylactic therapy in patients with aHUS at transplantation is the first step toward restrictive use of eculizumab.[3] However, there is a risk of aHUS relapse after eculizumab discontinuation, and relapse may lead to AKI, irreversible chronic kidney disease (CKD), ESRD, and potentially neurological and cardiovascular manifestations.[4] In the current case, a 2-year disease-free period was achieved with successful eculizumab treatment. After this period, the patient discontinued the medication voluntarily and stopped follow-up. aHUS presentation can be idiopathic or associated with triggers. Approximately 50% of cases are triggered by infections, primarily upper respiratory tract infection or diarrhea. Pregnancy is another frequent trigger for women and most will present in the postpartum period.[4] The recurrence of aHUS occurred in this patient following the use of OCs for the last 15 days due to menstrual irregularity. However, no other reason for the relapse could be identified. The duration of onset of TMA in patients with OCs varies from 3 weeks to 10 years.[5] In the current case, recurrence was observed 15 days after the use of OCs. The reason for the earlier TMA in this case compared to other cases may have been the presence of CFH and CFHR5 heterozygous gene mutations.

Fakhouri et al. analyzed the risk of relapse associated with complement gene variants after eculizumab discontinuation in 38 patients. The 3-year risk of aHUS relapse after eculizumab discontinuation was found to be significantly higher in patients with pathogenic variants in CFH genes compared to patients with no identified variants.[4] In the current case, there was also CFH Arg1215Gly heterozygous gene mutation, which can be considered to have had an effect on the relapse.

The relationship between drugs and aHUS is unclear. There are a few case reports of aHUS relapse with the usage of some drugs (calcineurin inhibitors, quinine, mitomycin C, cisplatin, etc.).[6] OCs are also thought to trigger aHUS, and reports have described an increased frequency of thromboembolic events and strong evidence for the presence of an abnormal state of hypercoagulability in women using OCs.[7] However, there are also several case reports of aHUS relapse due to pregnancy.[8] OCs and other drugs which raise estrogen levels induce TTP/aHUS by a mechanism similar to that leading to the condition during pregnancy or postpartum, possibly by reducing prostacyclin production.[9]

In conclusion, aHUS patients with FH mutation are at greater risk of recurrence and should be closely monitored. OCs are also thought to trigger aHUS, and recurrence of aHUS due to OC use was considered in the present case. Therefore, to minimize the risk of disease relapse, the use of OCs in aHUS patients should be avoided, especially those who are FH mutation-positive. In addition, decision to reduce eculizumab should be approached on an individual basis. In all cases of discontinuation eculizumab, close monitoring of patients with blood tests and urine analysis is required to allow for early detection of aHUS relapse.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Raina R, Krishnappa V, Blaha T, Kann T, Hein W, Burke L, et al. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: An update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Ther Apher Dial 2019;23:4-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Licht C, Greenbaum LA, Muus P, Babu S, Bedrosian CL, Cohen DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome from 2-year extensions of phase 2 studies. Kidney Int 2015;87:1061-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wijnsma KL, Duineveld C, Wetzels JFM, van de Kar NCAJ. Eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: Strategies toward restrictive use. Pediatr Nephrol 2019;34:2261-77.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fakhouri F, Fila M, Provôt F, Delmas Y, Barbet C, Châtelet V, et al. Pathogenic variants in complement genes and risk of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome relapse after eculizumab discontinuation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;12:50-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shirai H, Yashima J, Tojimbara T, Honda K. Thrombotic microangiopathy caused by oral contraceptives in a kidney transplant recipient. Nephrology (Carlton) 2016;21(Suppl 1):41-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Salvadori M, Bertoni E. Update on hemolytic uremic syndrome: Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. World J Nephrol 2013;2:56-76.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Brown CB, Clarkson AR, Robson JS, Cameron JS, Thomson D, Ogg CS. Hemolytic uraemic syndrome in women taking oral contraceptives. Lancet 1973;30:1479-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kumar D, King M, Jim B, Acharya A. Recurrent case of pregnancy-induced atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (P-aHUS). BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:bcr-2018-226571.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dlott JS, Danielson CFM, Blue-Hnidy DE, McCarthy LJ. Drug-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome: A concise review. Ther Apher Dial 2004;8:102-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

 
Top
 
 
  Search
 
  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed81    
    PDF Downloaded2    

Recommend this journal

Indian Journal of Nephrology
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th Sept '07