Translate this page into:
Survival Outcomes and Mortality Risk Factors in Peritoneal Dialysis
Corresponding author: Jayaprakash Thangavel, Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Ranipet, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: jayaprakash.t.pg@cmcvellore.ac.in
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Thangavel J, Mishra U, Balusamy D, Lalwani M, Johny J, Mani SSR, et al. Survival Outcomes and Mortality Risk Factors in Peritoneal Dialysis. Indian J Nephrol. doi: 10.25259/IJN_260_2025
Abstract
Background
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a widely used renal replacement modality, yet long-term survival remains suboptimal, especially in resource-constrained settings. This study aimed to assess survival rates and associated clinical and socioeconomic factors among patients on PD at a tertiary care center in South India.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 428 patients initiated on PD between January 2012 and December 2023. Baseline demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic variables were collected. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and predictors of mortality were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
The median follow-up was 21.5 months (IQR: 11.8–39.6). The mean age at initiation was 51.6 ± 14.5 years, and 67.5% were male. Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 86.4%, 67.0%, 56.5%, and 31.8%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of mortality included diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.98; P = 0.014), diabetic kidney disease, hypoalbuminemia (hazard ratio, 1.446; P = 0.010), and cerebrovascular disease (hazard ratio, 1.738; P = 0.015). Insurance coverage was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.396; P < 0.0001). Cardiovascular disease accounted for most known deaths (32.1%), followed by infection-related complications. Patients who initiated dialysis directly with PD had superior survival outcomes compared to those who transitioned from hemodialysis (HD). Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design and missing data on key variables such as residual renal function and precise causes of death.
Conclusion
Mortality among Indian PD patients is driven by atherovascular and metabolic comorbidities, malnutrition, and socioeconomic factors. Our findings highlight the need for early referral, optimal cardiovascular disease management and greater financial support to improve outcomes in PD programs across India.
Keywords
Mortality
Patient survival
Peritoneal dialysis
Risk factors
Introduction
Kidney failure presents a growing health burden in India, driven by increasing rates of diabetes, hypertension, and an aging population.1 Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) offers a viable renal replacement therapy, especially in resource-limited settings, due to its flexibility and lower dependence on healthcare infrastructure.2 Despite its potential, peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains underutilized in India, and data on long-term outcomes and mortality risk factors among patients are limited.3,4
Global studies have identified predictors of mortality in PD patients, such as age, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, nutritional status, and peritonitis, but these findings may not fully translate to the Indian context due to demographic and healthcare disparities.3,5 Region-specific evidence is needed to guide clinical management and improve patient outcomes.
This retrospective study aims to assess survival and identify key predictors of mortality among PD patients at a tertiary care center, offering insights into the effectiveness of PD and highlighting potential targets for intervention in similar settings.
Materials and Methods
This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis conducted at Christian Medical College Vellore, a prominent teaching hospital in Southern India. The study included all adult patients (≥18 years) who began PD between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2023. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, which granted a waiver of informed consent due to retrospective nature of the study. Hence patient consent was not obtained. Patients who started PD for non-renal reasons were excluded from the analysis.
At our center, most PD catheters were inserted percutaneously by nephrologists trained in catheter placement, using a sterile operating room environment. The rest underwent open surgical insertion, typically due to prior abdominal surgery or anatomical considerations. A standard 2-week break-in period was observed before initiating full-volume exchanges. Early initiation was infrequent and not analyzed separately due to small numbers.
Demographic, clinical, and dialysis-related data at dialysis initiation were collected from electronic patient records. These included age, sex, circulating blood-borne viruses (HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus), BMI, hypoalbuminemia, primary kidney disease, reason for opting PD, comorbid conditions, dialysis vintage and kidney transplant history, financial support, and history of PD peritonitis. Financial support encompassed all sources, including private insurance, government health schemes, and employer-based coverage. BMI was divided into four groups according to the World Health Organization Asian BMI classification: BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (underweight), BMI 18.5–22.9 kg/m2 (normal range) BMI 23–24.9 kg/m2 (overweight), and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (obese). Hypoalbuminemia was defined as serum albumin <3.5 g/dL. Data on presence of comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and cardiac failure were included. The Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI) was used to assess comorbidity burden. The following causes of death in PD patients were also collected retrospectively in this study: cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events, peritonitis-related sepsis, sepsis due to other infections, malignancies, pulmonary events (respiratory failure secondary to primary pulmonary pathology like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), other causes (include trauma, gastrointestinal bleed).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Mean and standard deviation were reported for continuous variables with a normal distribution, while median and interquartile range (IQR) were used for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. To compare continuous variables between two groups, a parametric t-test was applied for normally distributed data, and the Mann-Whitney test was used for non-normally distributed data. Normality was assessed using standard criteria. The Pearson Chi-square test was employed to examine associations between categorical variables. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between risk factors and outcomes. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Patient survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with time zero defined as the PD initiation date. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Patients were censored at the earliest of the following events: transfer to hemodialysis (HD), kidney transplantation, loss to follow-up, or administrative censoring at the end date. The cumulative survival probabilities were calculated at 1, 2, and 3 years, with longer-term estimates reported descriptively and interpreted cautiously due to the progressively smaller number of patients at risk. Patients with incomplete survival data or unknown status at last follow-up were censored at their last recorded contact date. The survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and the number at risk at each time point was provided. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, New York, USA).
Results
A total of 550 patients were initiated on PD at our center during the study. Of these, 122 were excluded due to one or more of the following reasons: age <18 years at PD initiation, PD started for non-renal indications, or follow-up of <3 months. Twenty-three patients were lost within 3 months due to transfer to other centers, socioeconomic barriers, or unknown reasons. The final study cohort comprised 428 patients [Figure 1]. Nearly all patients in our cohort received manual PD, with only three on automated PD (APD).

- Flowchart of patient selection. PD: Peritoneal dialysis.
The mean age at initiation was 51.6 ± 14.5 years, and 67.5% were male. The median follow-up duration was 21.5 (IQR: 11.8–39.6) months, with the longest follow-up extending to 10.5 years. Around 53.5% had diabetes and 94.2% were hypertensive. A history of hemodialysis was present in 272 patients (63.6%). The median duration of hemodialysis prior to PD initiation in our cohort was 3.13 months (IQR: 1.65–7.55 months). Baseline demographic and clinical parameters, including age, sex, BMI distribution, comorbidities, and etiology of kidney disease, were largely similar between the PD and HD cohorts.
Patient's personal preference (74.9) was the most common reason for opting PD followed by multiple HD access failures (15%). Peritonitis was reported in 23.8% of patients. Among these, nine patients (8.8%) had multiple episodes, 14 (13.7%) developed fungal peritonitis, and five (4.9%) had tuberculous peritonitis [Table 1].
| Characteristics | Overall (n=428) | Survival Group (n=201) | Mortality Group (n=227) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||||
| <40 | 90 (21.0) | 60 (66.7) | 30 (33.3) | <0.0001 |
| 40–60 | 215 (50.2) | 99 (46) | 116 (54) | |
| >60 | 123 (28.7) | 42 (31.1) | 81 (65.9) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 289 (67.5) | 129 (44.6) | 160 (55.4) | 0.99 |
| Female | 139 (32.5) | 72 (51.8) | 67 (48.2) | |
| Body mass index category (kg/m2) | ||||
| Underweight (<18.5) | 49 (11.4) | 26 (53.1) | 23 (46.9) | 0.188 |
| Normal (18.5–22.9) | 153 (35.7) | 62 (40.5) | 91 (59.5) | |
| Overweight (23–24.9) | 90 (21) | 42 (46.7) | 48 (53.3) | |
| Obesity (≥25) | 136 (31.8) | 71 (52.2) | 65 (47.8) | |
| Virology status (positive) | ||||
| HIV | 19 (4.4) | 7 (36.8) | 12 (63.2) | 0.253 |
| HBV | 16 (3.7) | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | 0.304 |
| HCV | 12 (2.8) | 3 (25) | 9 (75) | 0.104 |
| Hypoalbuminemia (<3.5g/dL) | ||||
| No | 264 (61.7) | 136 (51.5) | 128 (48.5) | 0.017 |
| Yes | 164 (38.3) | 65 (39.6) | 99 (60.4) | |
| First RRT modality | ||||
| HD | 272 (63.6) | 117 (43) | 155 (57) | 0.035 |
| PD | 156 (36.4) | 84 (53.8) | 72 (46.2) | |
| Reason for opting | ||||
| Personal choice | 319 (74.9) | 160 (50.2) | 159 (49.8) | 0.016 |
| Multiple HD access failures | 64 (15) | 20 (31.3) | 44 (68.8) | |
| Nonavailability of nearby HD center | 26 (6.1) | 12 (46.2) | 14 (53.8) | |
| Bridge to transplant | 6 (1.4) | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | |
| Other medical reasons | 13 (3.0) | 4 (30.8) | 9 (69.2) | |
| Native kidney disease | ||||
| Diabetic kidney disease | 182 (42.5) | 65 (35.7) | 117 (64.3) | 0.001 |
| Chronic glomerular diseases | 49 (11.4) | 33 (67.3) | 16 (32.7) | |
| Chronic tubulointerstitial diseases | 11 (2.6) | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | |
| Hypertensive renal diseases | 10 (2.3) | 5 (50) | 5 (50) | |
| Other etiologies | 53 (12.4) | 25 (47.2) | 28 (52.8) | |
| Unknown | 123 (28.7) | 67 (54.5) | 56 (45.5) | |
| Comorbidities | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | 229 (53.5) | 88 (38.4) | 141 (61.6) | <0.0001 |
| Hypertension | 403 (94.2) | 189 (46.9) | 214 (53.1) | 1.0000 |
| Heart disease | 98 (23) | 28 (28.6) | 70 (71.4) | <0.0001 |
| Cerebrovascular accidents | 29 (6.8) | 4 (13.8) | 25 (86.2) | <0.0001 |
| Chronic pulmonary diseases | 15 (3.5) | 3 (20) | 12 (80) | 0.0280 |
| Malignancy | 22 (5.1) | 9 (40.9) | 13 (59.1) | 0.3590 |
| Liver diseases | 14 (3.3) | 5 (35.7) | 9 (64.3) | 0.4290 |
| Modified charlson comorbidity index (mCCI) category (score) | ||||
| Mild (1–2) | 15 (3.5) | 9 (60) | 6 (40) | |
| Intermediate (3–4) | 155 (36.2) | 95 (61.3) | 60 (38.7) | |
| Severe (≥5) | 258 (60.3) | 97 (37.6) | 161 (62.4) | <0.0001 |
| Mode of PD catheterization | ||||
| Percutaneous | 414 (93) | 96 (90.6) | 318 (93.8) | 0.253 |
| Laparoscopic | 31 (7) | 10 (9.4) | 21 (6.2) | |
| History of PD peritonitis episodes | ||||
| Absent | 326 (76.2) | 147 (45.1) | 179 (54.9) | 0.102 |
| Present | 102 (23.8) | 54 (52.9) | 48 (47.1) | |
| Financial support | ||||
| Self-paid | 370 (86.4) | 163 (44.1) | 207 (55.9) | 0.003 |
| Insurance supported | 58 (13.6) | 38 (65.5) | 20 (34.5) | |
| Follow up (months) | 21.53 (11.8–39.64) | 22.5 (11.8–38.96) | 20.27 (11.83–40.6) | 0.768 |
PD: Peritoneal dialysis, HD: Hemodialysis, HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, HBV: Hepatitis B virus, HCV: Hepatitis C virus, RRT: Renal replacement therapy
During the last follow-up, 227 patients died, and 97 (22.7%) were transitioned to HD. The number of patients initially started on PD was significantly higher in the survivors group compared to nonsurvivors [84 (53.8%) vs. 72 (46.2%); P = 0.035]. Conversely, patients transferred from HD to PD were more common in nonsurvivors [155 (57%) vs. 117 (43%); P = 0.035]. A greater proportion of patients had opted for PD due to multiple HD access failures and other associated medical conditions (like cardiac failure, chronic liver disease) in the mortality group.
Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a cumulative patient survival of 86.4%, 67.0%, and 56.5% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Although survival estimates beyond 3 years showed a marked decline (42.1%, 31.8%, and 10.1% at 4, 5, and 10 years, respectively), these should be cautiously interpreted due to the small number of patients remaining at risk. Therefore, primary survival analyses and interpretations were restricted to the 3-year follow-up, which reflects the most statistically reliable segment of the cohort [Figure 2].

- Kaplan-Meier survival curve of PD patients. Black line indicates the number of patients at risk (at every year point). PD: Peritoneal dialysis.
Risk factors for mortality
Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that elderly age, multiple HD access failures, other medical reasons for opting PD, diabetic kidney disease as native kidney disease, comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, prior cardiac illnesses, history of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and higher mCCI index were independently associated with poor patient survival. However, having insurance coverage was associated with a lower risk of mortality [Table 2].
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | p value | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | p value | |
| Age (Advanced) | 1.500 | 1.235–1.822 | < 0.0001 | 1.222 | 0.978–1.528 | 0.078 |
| Hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) | 1.649 | 1.263–2.153 | < 0.001 | 1.446 | 1.094–1.912 | 0.010 |
| Diabetic kidney disease (as NKD) | 1.769 | 1.356–2.306 | < 0.001 | 1.978 | 1.150–3.401 | 0.014 |
| History of diabetes mellitus | 1.902 | 1.441–2.510 | < 0.001 | 1.978 | 1.150–3.401 | 0.014 |
| Prior cardiac illness | 1.579 | 1.190–2.094 | 0.002 | 1.224 | 0.903–1.660 | 0.193 |
| History of prior CVA | 1.684 | 1.109–2.557 | 0.014 | 1.738 | 1.115–2.709 | 0.015 |
| Higher mCCI Score | 1.861 | 1.424–2.433 | < 0.0001 | 1.122 | 0.716–1.760 | 0.615 |
| Financial support | 0.425 | 0.268–0.673 | < 0.0001 | 0.396 | 0.245–0.641 | < 0.0001 |
CVA: Cerebrovascular accidents, mCCI: Modified charlson comorbidity index, CI: Confidence interval
Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that advanced patient age, hypoalbuminemia, diabetic kidney disease as the etiology of native kidney disease, and a history of diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with reduced patient survival, whereas insurance coverage was associated with improved survival.
Causes of mortality
Among the deceased, the cause of death was identified in 106 patients (47.1%), whereas it remained unknown in 119 (52.9%).
Among the former, cardiovascular events were the leading cause of death (32.1%). This was followed by sepsis due to infections other than peritonitis (20.8%) and sepsis secondary to PD-associated peritonitis (17.9%). CVA contributed to 9.4% of the deaths, while pulmonary infections, malignancy, and other causes accounted for 8.5%, 3.8%, and 7.5% of the mortality cases, respectively [Figure 3].

- Causes of mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.
Discussion
The present study analyzed 10 years of experience with 428 PD patients at a tertiary care center, with a median follow-up duration of 21.5 months. We found the long-term survival to be modest, with a sharp decline after the third year. Multiple demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic variables were identified as predictors of mortality, with diabetes mellitus, hypoalbuminemia, diabetic kidney disease, and cerebrovascular disease showing consistent associations across univariate and multivariate analyses.
Our findings align with prior data from large PD registries and observational studies, which have consistently highlighted the significant impact of age and comorbid burden on PD outcomes. The average age of our cohort was 51.6 years, notably younger than those reported in Western PD populations such as the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) cohorts, which often report mean initiation ages >60 years.6,7 Despite this demographic advantage, long-term survival in our cohort was modest, possibly reflecting the high comorbidity burden, late referral patterns, and resource constraints prevalent in many low- and middle-income settings.8
The overall survival rates in our cohort at 1, 2, and 3 years were 86.4%, 67.0%, and 56.5%, respectively. They are lower than those reported in major international PD registries. For instance, the USRDS reports 1-year and 3-year survival rates of ~89% and 64%, respectively, among incident PD patients, while ANZDATA (2024) indicates similar benchmarks in high-resource settings, with 1-year survival exceeding 90% and 3-year survival above 70% in some subgroups.7,9 Compared with other Indian studies [Table 3], the survival rates in the first 3 years in our cohort are better than those observed in Vikrant et al.'s cohort.10–12 These disparities may be attributed to differences in healthcare infrastructure, timing of nephrology referral, nutritional status, and access to continuous follow-up and interventions such as assisted PD and infection surveillance. The overall trends of declining survival after 3 years are similar across the studies. The marked decline in survival beyond the third year may reflect a combination of cumulative comorbidity burden and resource limitations, which are commonly observed in lower-income settings.13
| Parameter | Prasad et al.11 (2008) | Abraham et al.12 (2010) | Vikrant et al.10 (2014) | Current study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study type | Prospective observational | Retrospective multicenter | Retrospective single-center | Retrospective single-center |
| Location | SGPGI, Lucknow | 4 centers, South India | Govt. hospital, North India | Tertiary care center, South India |
| Sample size | 373 (197 diabetics, 176 non-diabetics) | 209 (150 survivors ≥3 years, 59 non-survivors) | 60 | 428 |
| Study period | Not specified | 1999–2004 | Oct 2002 – Dec 2011 | Jan 2012 – Dec 2023 |
| Follow-up (months) | 22 ± 14 | 36 | 29.6 ± 23 | 21.5 (11.8, 39.6) |
| Mean age (years) | 51.3 | 50.9 ± 14.9 | 60.2 ± 9.2 | 51.6 ± 14.5 |
| Diabetics: 56±10, non-diabetics: 46±15 | Survivors: 50.9, non-survivors: 56.6 | Survivors: 47.89 ± 14.86, non-survivors: 54.93 ± 13.3 | ||
| % Diabetics | 52.8% | 38% | 47% | 53.5% |
| Survival rates | 1 year: 90% | Yearly survival data are not available | 1 year: 77% | 1 year: 86.4% |
| 2 years: 72% | 2 years: 53% | 2 years: 67.0% | ||
| 3 years: 60% | 3 years: 25% | 3 years: 56.5% | ||
| 4 years: 49% | 4 years: 15% | 4 years: 42.4% | ||
| 5 years: 39% | 5 years: 10% | 5 years: 31.8% | ||
| Overall, worse in diabetics | 10 years: 10.1% | |||
| Diabetic vs. Non-diabetic survival predictors of mortality | Significantly worse in diabetics (p = 0.001) | Nondiabetics had better long-term survival | Similar, not statistically significant | Worse in diabetics; HR 1.98 (p > 0.014) |
| Diabetes, Comorbidities, Malnutrition, GFR | Hb <11 g/dL, Low UF, Smoking | Peritonitis, comorbidities | Diabetes | |
| Peritonitis | Low albumin | CVA, Low albumin | ||
| No financial support | ||||
| Other notables | Residual GFR protective | One-time payment/reimbursement improved survival | - | Direct PD initiation, Availability of Financial support had better survival |
CVA: Cerebrovascular accidents, GFR: Glomerular filtration rate, Hb: Hemoglobin, HR: Hazard ratio, PD: Peritoneal dialysis, SGPGI: Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Diabetes and diabetic kidney disease were each independently associated with mortality, consistent with large observational studies from the USRDS, the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA), and ANZDATA.6,7 These findings reinforce the established risk conferred by both systemic and renal complications of diabetes in dialysis patients. Patients with diabetic kidney disease had nearly twice the risk of death in multivariable models.12
Hypoalbuminemia was present in ~40% of our cohort and was independently associated with mortality, echoing global evidence on the prognostic significance of serum albumin in dialysis patients.14,15 Low albumin likely reflects a complex matrix of malnutrition, inflammation, and fluid overload. Studies such as CANUSA and the NECOSAD cohort have demonstrated the incremental predictive value of albumin for mortality, reinforcing its utility as a clinical surveillance marker.16,17
In our cohort, BMI did not emerge as a statistically significant predictor of survival. This may be due to the influence of stronger prognostic factors such as age, cardiovascular comorbidities, or dialysis-related parameters. Additionally, the relatively low prevalence of extreme BMI categories in our cohort could have reduced the likelihood of detecting a significant association.
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality in PD patients worldwide. In our cohort, cardiovascular events accounted for 32.1% of known deaths, while cerebrovascular events were implicated in 9.4%. Notably, prior history of CVA, but not cardiac disease, remained independently predictive of mortality in multivariate analysis, potentially reflecting the disabling and progressive nature of cerebrovascular pathology.18–20
Infectious mortality, including sepsis unrelated to PD and peritonitis-associated infections, accounted for 38.7% of known deaths. These rates are higher than those reported in high-income countries and highlight the need for enhanced infection control measures, prompt treatment protocols, and patient education.21–23 Although our center follows standard PD training procedures, structural limitations and socioeconomic barriers likely contribute to infection risk.
A significant finding in our analysis was the protective association of financial support with patient survival. Having financial support was associated with a 60% lower risk of mortality (HR 0.396, P < .0001), underscoring the vital role of financial security in improving PD outcomes. The disproportionate burden of self-funded care in our cohort likely contributed to delayed interventions, suboptimal nutrition, medication non-adherence, and treatment discontinuity. Similar trends have been noted in other middle-income settings, where out-of-pocket expenditure remains a major barrier to equitable dialysis care.3,24–27 These data support policy initiatives aimed at expanding insurance coverage for patients with ESKD, especially in low-resource settings.
Our study has several limitations. First, as a single-center retrospective analysis, the findings may not be generalizable to broader populations. Second, the cause of death remained unknown in >50% of the deceased, potentially introducing misclassification bias. Third, residual confounding due to unmeasured variables such as non-infectious complications, socioeconomic status, medication adherence, and health literacy cannot be excluded. Finally, the lack of granular data on PD technique survival, residual renal function, and inflammatory biomarkers limits deeper mechanistic insights. Despite the limitations, our study provides valuable insights into long-term outcomes in a real-world PD population from a resource-constrained setting and is likely the largest Indian cohort to date.
This study has several important limitations. As a single-center, retrospective analysis, the findings may not be generalizable to other populations or care settings. The median follow-up of 21.5 months restricts the reliability of long-term survival estimates beyond 3 years, due to the progressively smaller number of patients at risk. Although Kaplan-Meier methods allow extrapolation, we have limited interpretation to 3-year survival, with later estimates presented cautiously. The cause of death was unknown in >50% of the deceased patients due to limited documentation and out-of-hospital deaths, a common challenge in resource-limited contexts. Furthermore, data on urine output and residual renal function were not consistently recorded, preventing assessment of their impact on outcomes despite their known prognostic value. While peritonitis episodes were documented, precise timing and standardized peritonitis rates (e.g., per patient-year) could not be calculated due to incomplete records. Similarly, other non-infective PD complications, such as exit-site infections, hernias, and catheter-related issues, were not systematically captured. Finally, residual confounding from unmeasured factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, medication adherence, health literacy) cannot be excluded. Despite these limitations, this study contributes valuable insights into PD outcomes in a real-world, resource-constrained setting and represents one of the largest reported Indian cohorts to date.
In summary, this study highlights the multifactorial nature of mortality in patients undergoing PD, with metabolic, vascular, nutritional, and socioeconomic factors all contributing to adverse outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of early referral, comprehensive comorbidity management, infection prevention, and enhanced financial support systems to optimize long-term survival in PD patients, particularly in resource-constrained environments. Future research should focus on prospective multicenter registries and interventional studies targeting high-risk subgroups identified in our analysis.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank the peritoneal dialysis nurses, Mrs. Usha Jacob and Mrs. Shirley Angeline Christy, for their diligent support throughout the study period. We acknowledge their invaluable assistance in collecting patient data and clinical details.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- Epidemiology and risk factors of chronic kidney disease in India — Results from the SEEK (Screening and early evaluation of kidney disease) study. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:144.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Peritoneal dialysis-First policy made successful: Perspectives and actions. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2013;62:993-1005.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Home peritoneal dialysis: Past, present, and future in India. IJN. 2024;0:1-4.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Peritoneal dialysis in India is dying—Is weaning from the ventilator likely? Indian J Nephrol. 2024;35:123-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Prediction of the mortality risk in peritoneal dialysis patients using machine learning models: A nation-wide prospective Cohort in Korea. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7470.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Peritoneal Dialysis. 24 Published online [Last accessed on 2025 April 15]
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Accessed April 25, 2025 [Last accessed on 2025 April 15]
- [Publisher]
- Peritoneal dialysis in the 21st century: An analysis of current problems and future developments. J Am Soc Nephrol (13 Suppl 1):S104-16.
- [Google Scholar]
- ANZDATA 47th Annual Report 2024 (Data Survey 2023) - ANZDATA. Accessed June 7, 2025 [Last accessed on 2025 April 15]
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Long-term clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients: 9-year experience of a single center from north India. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34:426-33.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- A comparison of outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic CAPD patients in India. Perit Dial Int. 2008;28:468-76.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Predictors of long-term survival on peritoneal dialysis in South India: A multicenter study. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30:29-34.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The peritoneal dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (PDOPPS): Unifying efforts to inform practice and improve global outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36:297-30.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Serum albumin at 1 year after peritoneal dialysis predicts long-term outcomes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ren Fail. 2022;44:252-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Serum albumin and survival in CAPD patients: The implications of concentration trends over time. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12:554-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:198-207.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strong association between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;55:1899-911.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malnutrition, cardiac disease, and mortality: An integrated point of view. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32:834-41.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stroke in patients undergoing dialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 2000;23:77-82.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Incidence, etiology, and outcome of stroke in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:98-105.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The impact of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:186.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Outcome and complications in peritoneal dialysis patients: A five-year single center experience. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011;22:245-51.
- [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Severe infections in peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients: An inception cohort study. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0286579. [Last accessed on 2025 April 15]
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Peritoneal dialysis—First initiative in India: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2022;15:128-35.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Economic costs of automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Taiwan: A combined survey and retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015067. [Last accessed on 2025 April 15]
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Study of caregiver burden in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Indian J Nephrol. 2024;34:597-602.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Financial barriers to the optimal use of peritoneal dialysis in France and Europe Issad B. as in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33:2125-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]

