Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Brief Communication
32 (
3
); 266-267
doi:
10.4103/ijn.IJN_54_20

A Strange Case of Renal Graft Lithiasis

Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar do Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal
Department of Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
Department of Cirgury, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
Address for correspondence: Dr. Elsa Soares, Rua Camilo Castelo Branco Apto 140, Setúbal, Portugal. E-mail: Elsa.qsoares@gmail.com
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Lithiasis following renal transplantation is a rare complication with an incidence less than 1%.[1]

We present a 43-year-old Caucasian female with a history of chronic kidney disease secondary to ischemic nephropathy, arterial hypertension, and secondary hyperparathyroidism on peritoneal dialysis since February 2018. She was admitted for a deceased donor kidney transplant in June 2019. Induction immunosuppression included basiliximab, prednisone, mycophenolic acid, and tacrolimus. The surgery occurred without complications and a double-J ureteral stent was placed as part of the transplantation protocol.

The patient was discharged at day 7 with a serum creatinine 1.01 mg/dL and with three graft ultrasounds without changes. Two-weeks later started cinacalcet 30 mg daily to control hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcemia. According to the protocol of our unit, the stent is removed 1 month after transplantation. Due to a delay in the schedule, this procedure was performed on the 45th day after the transplant. The patient always had preserved diuresis and no urinary symptoms. Stent removal was attempted by cystoscopy, but the procedure was unsuccessful. An abdominal X-ray [Figure 1] showed a well-placed double-J stent, with hyperdense images in the extremities suggesting lithiasis. Two months later, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed, and small calculi were excreted. Another attempt for stent removal failed and 3 weeks later, the stent was removed by open surgery.

Figure 1
Double-J stent, with hyperdense images in the extremities suggesting lithiasis

Renal lithiasis investigation showed: normal serum calcium (9.7 mg/dL), phosphorus (2.2 mg/dL), magnesium (1.21 mg/dL), and bicarbonate (25.3 mmol/L, 22-26 mmol/L); increased PTH (541 pg/mL); sterile urine culture; diminished urinary uric acid excretion (28 mg/24 h, 250–750 mg/24 h); and normal urinary excretion of phosphorus (0.9 g/24 h, 0.4-1.3 g/24 h), calcium (126 mg/24 h, 100–300 mg/24 h), magnesium (75.9 mg/dL, 73–1229 mg/dL), citrate (276 mg/24 h, 250–1153 mg/24 h), and oxalate (20.1 mg/24 h, 4–31 mg/24 h). The chemical analysis of a kidney stone revealed a mixed calcium and phosphorus composition (brushite). A CT was not performed on the donor's kidney to exclude lithiasis, however, there was no history of the previous lithiasis, and the recipient of the other organ did not develop any changes.

Urolithiasis in the context of transplant is a quite rare event.[2] Typical renal colic or pain is usually absent because of denervation of the transplant kidney and ureter. Rarely, the presentation resembles acute rejection or acute tubular necrosis.[1] Factors predisposing to stone formation are hyperparathyroidism, hypercalciuria, recurrent urinary tract infection, and hypocitraturia due to renal tubular acidosis. Less common risk factors include outflow obstruction, foreign bodies such as stents, nephrostomy tubes, suture materials, and donor lithiasis.[1]

After the investigation, we assume that the cause was secondary hyperparathyroidism, with the contribution of some calciuric effect of cinacalcet. It has been reported that cinacalcet treatment for Post-transplantation persistent hyperparathyroidism is a contributing factor for graft calculus formation due to hypercalciuria. Even transient, hypercalciuria has the potential to promote renal calcium deposition.[3] However, this is a rare situation since most patients undergoing renal transplantation have this complication and do not develop lithiasis.

Keeping in mind the absence of typical symptoms, we must have a high index of suspicion, to make the diagnosis in time. Thus, the treatment will be quick, and we will avoid the consequences for the renal graft.

Informed consent

Informed consent to publish was obtained from the patient.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , . Urinary stones following renal transplantation. Korean J Intern Med. 2001;16:118-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Urolithiasis in renal transplant donors and recipients: An update. Int J Surg. 2016;36:693-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Development of nephrolithiasis in renal transplant patient during treatment with Cinacalcet. Ann Transplant. 2013;18:31-5.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections