ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in India: A Single-Center Experience of First Hundred Cases

Introduction

Blood group incompatibility is an important immunological barrier in kidney transplantation. The use of plasmapheresis as a method to remove isoagglutinin was a watershed moment in the history of ABO incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplant.[1] Alexandre et al. from Belgium were the first to report a successful series of ABOi transplants with the use of plasmapheresis and splenectomy.[2] Japanese used it widely in the late 1980s followed by Americans and Europeans to increase the donor pool.[345] Use of rituximab in the early 2000s replaced surgical splenectomy, which used to be associated with high morbidity and mortality.[6] Last few decades have witnessed significant improvement in the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplant with the advent of newer preconditioning protocols and improved maintenance immunosuppression. There are very few publications of ABOi kidney transplants from the developing world. In the present study, we present our single-center experience of first hundred ABOi transplants performed over the last decade.

Materials and Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study performed at a tertiary health-care center in India. First ABOi kidney transplant at our center was performed in November 2011. Since then, 121 such transplants have been performed. First hundred consecutive ABOi kidney transplants performed were included for this study. All these patients had at least 6 months of follow-up.

Results

Since November 2011 till March 2020, a total of 121 ABOi kidney transplants were performed. First hundred patients who completed at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Median follow-up duration was 33 (10–101) months.

Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of the patients. Most common recipient blood group was O. The median baseline isoagglutinin titer was 128 (range 2 to 1024). Three patients were second transplant recipients. Two patients were both ABO and HLA-incompatible kidney transplant. Donor relation was wife in 51%, mother in 26%, siblings in 7%, father in 6%, husband in 3% and others in the remaining 7%. No induction was used in 13 patients while basiliximab was used in 65 patients, thymoglobulin in 11 patients, and grafalon in 11 patients.

Patient outcome is shown in Table 2. Patient survival was 93%. There were seven mortalities, of which four were due to infection and three due to cardiac event. One patient expired after 41 months of graft loss. Other patients expired with a functioning graft. Death censored graft survival was 94%. Figure 1 shows Kaplan–Meier curves for patient and graft survival. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rate was 17%. Rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection was 3%.

Close

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier graph for (a) patient survival and (b) graft survival. The number of transplants done in first 3 years was 7 only, followed by 37 in next 3 years and 56 in last 3 years

Export to PPT

Thirty-seven percentage patients had 53 episodes of infection. Most common of them was urinary tract infection (UTI) followed by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Figure 2 shows the details of these infections.

Close

Figure 2

Distribution of infections in ABO incompatible recipients. There were total 53 episodes of infections in 37 patients

Export to PPT

Discussion

ABOi kidney transplantation has come a long way with initially being a contraindication for transplant to now contributing to up to one-third of kidney transplant in countries like Japan.[9] The popularity has increased over the last few decades with improving understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying hyperacute rejection in such transplants, phenomenon of accommodation, and the availability of newer immunosuppressive medications.

The inadequate penetration of deceased donor program and lack of a national level registry data have led to increased acceptance of ABOi as a viable alternative in India as well. We published the first case report of ABOi kidney transplant from India.[10] From 2011 till 2013, a total of 7 ABOi transplants were done. As we gained more experience and confidence, this number increased to 37 during the period 2014–2016 and 56 during 2017–2019. Subsequently, we also published our initial experience of first 20 ABOi at our center with short follow-up.[11] The present article is first single-center experience of hundred ABOi kidney transplants from India. The age and sex distribution of our ABOi kidney transplant were comparable to our compatible transplants in general. The baseline titer varied from 2 to 1024 with median titer being 128. Nine patients had titer ≤8.

Patient survival was 93% in the present study. One-year patient survival was 98% in a meta-analysis by de-Weerd et al. while 5-year patient survival in UK national registry data of ABOi kidney transplant was 91%.[1213] In a large US national multicenter data, patient survival was 93.7% at 3 years and 88.3% at 5 years.[4] Major cause of patient loss in the present study was infection. In the study by de-Weerd et al., the cause of patient mortality was infection in 49% of cases.[12] Similarly, the collaborative transplant study also showed higher infection-related mortality in ABOi transplants.[5] Graft survival in our study was 94%. In the study by de-Weerd et al., one-year uncensored graft survival was 96% while in that of study by Montgomery et al., it was 82.6% at 3 years.[412] Major cause of graft loss in our study was acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

In the present study, biopsy-proven acute rejection rate was 17%. The acute AMR rate was 3%. All these AMRs happened within initial 72 h and biopsy findings were remarkable for the presence of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in all of them. Single antigen bead by Luminex did not reveal any anti-HLA antibody in at least two of them in whom it was done post-rejection. Similar findings of TMA and AMR have been reported in other studies as well and eculizumab has been successfully used to reverse such AMRs in few cases.[141516] The proposed mechanism of such TMA is endothelial damage caused by anti-blood group antibodies activating the complement system. In a study by Tasaki et al., nonuse of mycophenolate mofetil, pretreatment immunoglobulin G antibody titer ≥64- and pretransplant immunoglobulin M antibody titer ≥16- were significant risk factors for TMA in ABOi transplants.[15] None of the AMRs in our patients could be reversed despite prompt plasma exchange, IVIG, and other antirejection treatment such as thymoglobulin. We could not use eculizumab due to its nonavailability in India. All the episodes of acute AMR in our patients lead to the graft loss and ultimately required graft nephrectomy. Apart from these patients with acute TMA, another patient had chronic TMA leading to graft loss. Miura et al. have reported a similar case of chronic TMA causing graft loss in an ABOi transplant.[17]

Rate of infection was 37% in the present study. Infection has been an area of concern in previous studies of ABOi transplants as well, which has been thought to be due to extra immunosuppressive burden in these patients. Opelz et al. in a multicenter study of 1420 ABOi patients across Europe found that 1 additional death per 100 patients occurred in the first year after ABOi transplants when compared to ABOc patients.[5] Higher rates of nonviral and viral infections were also seen in the meta-analysis done by de-Weerd et al.[12] In our study, UTI was the major infection followed by CMV. Increase in viral infections such as CMV and BK virus (BKV) has also been reported in previous studies as well.[121819]

Limitations of the present study include relatively short duration of follow-up and retrospective design of the study. Also, there was heterogeneity in the use of induction. Despite these limitations, this is an important study because of the relatively large sample size compared to the previous studies from India.

ABOi transplant is an evolving field, and with increasing experience, the outcomes are improving as well. The Indian working group on ABOi renal transplant published guidelines, which has provided recommendations in this regard. This answers some important questions such as what is the best method of antibody determination, what should be the acceptable pretransplant titer, which is the best preconditioning protocol and what is the role of rituximab and IVIG in such transplants.[20]

Concluding, ABOi kidney transplant is a good alternative for patients who do not have suitable blood group compatible donors. The short-term patient and graft survival are good. There is an increased risk of infection in such transplants, and hence there is a need to be aggressive in minimizing the immunosuppression in these patients.