Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
30 (
4
); 286-289
doi:
10.4103/ijn.IJN_265_19

Novel Variation in CFB Adult Onset Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Case Report and Review

Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Malsawmkima Chhakchhuak, Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Basni, Jodhpur - 342 005, Rajasthan, India. E-mail: kimchhakchhuak@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

We report a case of 47-year-old male with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). He had low C3 levels and whole exome sequencing revealed heterozygous missense novel variation in exon 8 of the gene encoding complement factor B (CFB), leading to substitution of leucine for proline at codon 369 (c.1106C>T; p.Pro369Leu). Following plasma exchanges and hemodialysis, the patient achieved hematological remission and became dialysis independent.

Keywords

Acute kidney injury
atypical HUS
CFB gene
complement factor B
plasma exchange

Introduction

Approximately, 10% of all hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is atypical, caused by neither shigatoxin-producing bacteria nor streptococci. Atypical HUS (aHUS) is usually associated with perturbations in alternate complement cascade and has poor prognosis, with mortality as high as 25% and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 50% cases.[1] Complement factor B (CFB) is an essential component for activation of alternate complement pathway. Its active subunit combines with C3b to form C3 convertase (C3bBb), the chief driver of the activation of complement cascade. Gain of function mutations in CFB is described to cause chronic alternative complement pathway activation and is a rare cause of aHUS, implicated in only 1–2% of all cases of aHUS.[2]

Case Report

A 47-year-old male without previous comorbidities presented with complain of pedal edema, facial puffiness, and decreased urine output for 2 days. On examination, he had pallor, pedal edema, and blood pressure of 168/94 mm Hg. Rest of the physical examination was within normal limits. Laboratory parameters revealed hemoglobin 8.5 g/dl, total leukocyte count 11500/μL, platelet count 83000/μL, serum creatinine 7.4 mg/dl, serum lactate dehydrogenase 1565 U/L, peripheral blood film showing schistocytes, slightly raised total, and indirect bilirubin, normal kidney sizes on ultrasonography, no active urinary sediments, complement C3 level 46 mg/dl (normal level 90–180 mg/dl) and negative ANA; there was no evidence of G6PD deficiency. The patient received seven sessions of plasma exchanges along with three sessions of hemodialysis, following which he achieved hematological remission and became dialysis independent. Renal biopsy was done which revealed evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Antibodies to complement factor H were not sent for. Whole exome sequencing revealed novel heterozygous variation in exon 8 of the gene encoding complement factor B (CFB), at c.1106C>T (p.Pro369Leu) that was classified as variant of uncertain significance using the 2015 criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The disease relapsed once 1 month after hematological remission, with platelet count dropping to 75000/ μL and mildly elevated LDH (437 U/L). The relapse responded promptly to plasma infusions, administered at 20 ml/kg/day for 3 days, with platelet count and LDH returning to normal. However, C3 level remained low (52 mg/dl) and serum creatinine was 3.5 mg/dl on last follow-up.

Discussion

Hemolytic uremic syndrome is characterized by a triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Shigatoxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 is the most common type of HUS. HUS not caused by Stx is termed as atypical HUS and is primarily caused by complement dysregulation. Besides these, HUS might also be secondary to other infections, metabolic condition, drugs, pregnancy, autoimmune disease, or following transplantation.[13] Atypical HUS represents approximately 5–10% of all HUS in children and majority of cases in adult. aHUS is an uncommon disease, affecting two per million population. Almost 20% of cases of aHUS are familial.[4]

Deficiencies in the alternative complement pathway proteins include inactivating mutations of genes coding regulators of the alternative complement pathway, such as complement factor I (CFI), factor H (CFH), membrane cofactor protein (MCP), and thrombomodulin (THBD); gain of function mutations in genes encoding factor B (CFB) and C3 (C3), and, chiefly in children, antibodies to CFH associated with homozygous CFHR1 deletion. Additionally, single nucleotide polymorphisms or haplotypes in CFHR1, CFH, and MCP increase susceptibility to aHUS.[5] Mutations in CFH are most common (20–30% of aHUS), followed by MCP (10-15%), C3 (5-10%), CFI (4-10%), and THBD (5%); of these., gain-of-function mutations in CFB are the rarest, seen only in 1 to 2% of patients with aHUS.[2] Table 1 summarizes the handful of cases with CFB mutation reported worldwide. The first such report was of two mutations from the Spanish aHUS cohort in 2007.[2]

Table 1 Comparision of CFB gene mutation of various cohorts and case reports
Cohort/case report Patient (n) Genotype Nucleotide Amino acid change Domain
de Jorge et al., 2007[2] 1 Heterozygous c.858C>G F286L VWA
1 c.967A>G K323E VWA
Fremeaux-Bacchi et al., 2013[5] 1 - - D279G -
1 - K350D -
1 - P369L -
1 V455I -
Maga et al., 2010[6] 1 - c.497C>T p. 166P SCR3
1 c.608G>A p.R203Q SCR3
1 c.724A>C p.I242L -
1 c.967A>C p.K323Q VWA
1 c.1365C>T p.M458I VWA
1 c.1598A>G p.K533R SP
1 c.1807T>G p.F603V MG6b
1 c.3125G>T p.R1042L TED
1 c.608G>A p.R203Q SCR3
Tawadrous et al., 2010[7] 1 - c.1598A>G p.Lys533Arg -
Funato et al., 2014[8] 1 Heterozygous c.1050G>C p.Lys350Asn -
Geerdink et al., 2012[9] 2 - c.967A>G p.Lys323Glu -
Roumenina et al., 2009[10] 1 Heterozygous c.1050G>C p.Lys350Asn VWA
1 c.837A>C p.Asp279Gly VWA
Alfakeeh et al., 2016[11] 1 Heterozygous c.1697A>C p.Glu566Arg -
Zhang et al., 2016[12] 1 Heterozygous c.1598A>G p.Lys533Arg SP
1 Heterozygous c.221G>A Arg74His SCR1
1 Heterozygous c.2008A>G Lys670Glu SP

Outcomes of aHUS vary depending upon the underlying complement factor deficiency. Around 60–70% of aHUS patients with CFI, CFH, and C3 mutations, and 30% of those with anti-CFH autoantibodies die during the acute episode or go into end-stage kidney disease after relapses. Mutations in CFB are commonly associated with adverse renal outcomes, with loss of renal function in 88% of patients.[2]

Eculizumab is considered as the first-line therapy for all forms of primary aHUS, since this treatment improves renal function when started early during presentation with aHUS.[13] The duration of treatment remains unclear; whereas there is no evidence to support lifelong therapy in all types of aHUS, relapses occur after therapy discontinuation in 60-70% patients with CFH mutations, 50% with MCP mutations and 43% in C3 mutations.[14] Hence, long-term therapy is recommended. In our case, eculizumab was indicated but could not be started due to unavailability. Plasma therapy in the form of plasma exchange or plasma infusion may be the only therapy available, especially in developing countries such as in our case. The therapy should be started as soon as aHUS is suspected, ideally within 24 hours of presentation, and continued until normalization of platelet count and serum LDH. Plasma exchange is gradually tapered and withdrawn after achieving remission. Although there is limited evidence to establish the superiority of plasma exchange over plasma infusion, most experts recommend exchanges in view of the volume of plasma replaced. Overall, the choice is based on available resources, local expertise, and individual tolerance.[15] During plasma exchange, 1–2 plasma volumes (40–80 mL/ kg per in adults and 50–100 mL/kg in children) are replaced in each session, with exchange frequency and duration decided based on the clinical response. Plasma infusions are an option when eculizumab or plasma exchange are not available and are administered initially at 30–40 mL/kg, followed by 10–20 mL/kg/day. Plasma infusion are also used to prevent or treat recurrence of aHUS when eculizumab is not accessible, as in our patient, and should be continued until normalization of platelet count and serum LDH.[16] Recently published HUS guidelines on managing aHUS in developing countries recommended long-term plasma infusion and consideration of eculizumab in patients with aHUS with mutations in CFB, CFI, C3, CFH, or THBD.[17]

Data are limited on response to plasma therapy in patients with CFB mutations. Remission following plasma therapy was reported in five cases[27810] and in 30% patients with CFB mutation in another series.[1] In our patient, seven sessions of plasma exchanges led to hematological remission and discontinuation of dialysis, although renal function remained deranged. Family screening was offered after genetic counseling but could not be conducted due to financial constraints. The novel variation in CFB in our index patient while classified as variation of unknown significance using standard criteria, is uncommon, reported in 0.1%, and 0.05% cases in the 1000 Genome Project and Exome Aggregation Consortium databases, respectively. Its functional significance as a gain-in-function variation requires testing in animal and in vitro models.

Conclusion

We describe, in an adult patient with aHUS, a novel heterozygous variation in CFB in exon 8 leading to amino acid substitution of leucine for proline at codon 369 (c.1106C>T; p.Pro369Leu). The functional significance and pathogenicity of the reported change requires confirmation in in vitro and animal models and/or reporting in more patients with aHUS.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , . Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1676-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Gain-of-function mutations in complement factor B are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:240-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Nephrol. 2013;33:508-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:60.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Genetics and outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A nationwide French series comparing children and adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:554-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Mutations in alternative pathway complement proteins in American patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:1445-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . A novel mutation in the complement factor B gene (CFB) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:947-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . A complement factor B mutation in a large kindred with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 2014;34:691-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children: Complement mutations and clinical characteristics. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:1283-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Hyperfunctional C3 convertase leads to complement deposition on endothelial cells and contributes to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood. 2009;114:2837-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Rare genetic variant in the CFB gene presenting as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and immune complex diffuse membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, with crescents, successfully treated with Eculizumab. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32:885-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Comprehensive analysis of complement genes in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Nephrol. 2016;43:160-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: A single-arm, open-label trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:84-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Anticomplement treatment in atypical and typical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Hematol. 2018;55:150-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Atypical aHUS: State of the art. Mol Immunol. 2015;67:31-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Genetic Atypical Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome. 2007 Nov 16. In: , , , eds. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; . Updated 2016 Jun 9
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a developing country: Consensus guidelines. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34:1465-82.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections