Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Commentary
27 (
5
); 335-336
doi:
10.4103/0971-4065.175982

Recurrent Crescentic Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy in the Graft Kidney

Department of Nephrology, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. V. Bhargava, Institute of Renal Science, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India. E-mail: vinant.bhargava@gmail.com

Read COMMENTARY-ARTICLE associated with this -

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Recurrence of the original disease is now the third most frequent cause of renal allograft loss at 10 years after transplantation in patients with underlying glomerulonephritis (GN). IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common type of GN and recurs in up to 60% of the patients.[1] Initially considered to be a relatively benign phenomenon, recurrences develop in approximately 33% of patients, ranging between 9% and 61%, among the different series.[2] Clinical recurrence may occur immediately after transplantation, but on an average, the diagnosis is made approximately 3 years after transplantation.[23] It is usually suspected by the presence of hematuria and low-grade proteinuria. In the past issue of the Journal, a case of recurrent crescentic IgAN in the renal allograft in two successive kidney transplant surgeries highlighted the limitations of the current day understanding of the aggressive form of this glomerular disease.[4]

The authors have reported two consecutive episodes of rapidly progressive GN in their patient after having received grafts from live as well as deceased donors. Currently, there is no consensus about an approach to reduce the risk or severity of recurrent IgAN. Recurrence tends to occur more frequently in younger patients and those with a rapid progression of the original disease.[156] It is unclear if recurrence is[78] or is not[59] more frequent in transplants using related donors. A review of the data collected by the Australia-New Zealand registry reported that biopsy-proven IgAN recurrence was significantly more frequent in zero human leukocyte antigen-mismatched living donor grafts.[10] However, these results should be interpreted with some caution because certain basic details are lacking in the retrospective reviews of this registry data. Most other pretransplant characteristics do not predict recurrence, although some authors have suggested that latent IgA deposits in the donor kidney (in “zero” time biopsies of the transplanted kidney) are highly associated with a recurrence of disease,[11] and underlying crescentic GN with rapid progression to end-stage renal disease may also predict a higher risk for recurrence.[11] There is now, a general agreement that the type and intensity of posttransplant immunosuppression do not influence the risk of IgAN recurrence.[12] However, authors in this issue, have observed that intensifying immunosuppression after recurrence was beneficial in salvaging the renal allograft of their patient.

There is some speculation that the incidence of recurrence of IgAN might be lower in those given anti-thymocyte globulin induction. The induction agent used by the authors was interleukin-2 receptor blocking agent. Berthoux et al.[13] have reported that the 10-year cumulative recurrence rate of IgAN was 9% (3 of 29) in patients who received induction with anti-thymocyte globulins versus 41% (21 of 52) in patients who did not receive such induction therapy. The authors hypothesized that the protective effect of anti-thymocyte globulins could be related to an augmented production of regulatory T-cells. Tang et al. have reported that ATG has been found to be protective with an 80% reduction in relative risk. However, this needs to be confirmed in a prospective trial.[11] Besides, preference of either one of the two induction agents in preventing recurrence of crescentic GN is debatable due to lack of data.

Recurrent IgAN leads to graft dysfunction or loss in upto 16% of cases.[141516] Recurrent and de- novo crescentic IgAN is a rare entity. This finding is uncommon and is estimated to account for approximately 3–5% (when >50% of glomeruli are involved by crescents) and 32% of cases (if any number of glomeruli are involved).[17] It is clear that IgAN with crescents most often occurs in patients with preexisting IgAN and is an uncommon de novo disease in transplanted kidneys.[18] There appears to be a male preponderance and no association with the time since transplantation.[18] It appears that the presence of crescents in a kidney allograft with IgAN, at any time after transplantation, is associated with graft failure significantly earlier than might be predicted as per the natural course of IgAN. None of the factors postulated to be responsible for IgAN recurrence have been implicated for recurrence of crescentic IgAN. The only factor identifiable as a significant risk for the development of IgAN with crescents in an allograft kidney is the presence of IgAN in the native kidneys.[18]

In conclusion, crescentic IgAN in kidney allografts is an uncommon and an aggressive form of disease that can occur at any time during the post transplantation period. It often follows a rapid clinical course and leads to allograft loss within a short period. No single risk factor has been recognized to be responsible for its development. Use of anti-thymocyte globulin as an induction agent may have some protective role in preventing recurrence of this disease. Since, there appears to be no proven prevention strategy, it may be advisable to prefer a deceased donor organ in those who have end-stage renal disease due to crescentic IgAN. Furthermore, both the underlying pathophysiological characteristics and effective treatment for this disease remain elusive and needs further research and evaluation.

References

  1. , . Recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24:287-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Renal transplantation in patients with IgA mesangial glomerulonephritis. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8:334-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Recurrent and de novo disease after renal transplantation: A report from the renal allograft disease registry. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8:349-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Two consecutive recurrences of crescentic immunoglobulin A nephropathy in a renal transplant recipient. Indian J Nephrol. 2016;26:376-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Kidney transplantation in patients with IgA mesangial glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1948-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Probability, predictors, and prognosis of posttransplantation glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:843-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Exclusive characteristics of graft survival and risk factors in recipients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy: A retrospective analysis of registry data. Transplantation. 2005;80:1012-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Recurrent IgA nephropathy in renal transplant allografts. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:588-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Live donor renal allograft in end-stage renal failure patients from immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Transplantation. 2001;71:233-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Recurrence of IgA nephropathy among renal allograft recipients from living donors is greater among those with zero HLA mismatches. Transplantation. 2006;82:759-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Recurrent or de novo IgA nephropathy with crescent formation after renal transplantation. Ren Fail. 2008;30:611-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Impact of immunosuppressive medication on the risk of renal allograft failure due to recurrent glomerulonephritis. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:804-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy and disease recurrence in renal transplant recipients with primary IgA nephropathy. Transplantation. 2008;85:1505-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Glomerulonephritis recurrence in the renal graft. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:394-402.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Favorable outcome of renal transplantation in patients with IgA nephropathy. Clin Nephrol. 2001;56:279-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Single-center long-term results of renal transplantation for IgA nephropathy. Transplantation. 1998;65:1053-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1164-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . IgA nephropathy with crescents in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:167-75.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    247

    PDF downloads
    186
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections