Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
24 (
1
); 45-47
doi:
10.4103/0971-4065.125094

Successful three-way kidney paired donation transplantation: The first Indian report

Department of Nephrology and Clinical Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Dr. HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion Services and Immunohematology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Dr. HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
Department of Urology and Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Dr. HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center, Dr. HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Vivek B. Kute, Department of Nephrology and Clinical Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Dr. H L Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Civil Hospital Campus, Ahmedabad - 380 016, Gujarat, India. E-mail: drvivekkute@rediffmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Providing transplantation opportunities for patients with incompatible live donors through kidney paired donation (KPD) is an important strategy for easing the crisis in organ availability. KPD is can overcome the barriers when the only living potential donors are deemed unsuitable owing to an incompatibility of blood type, of human leukocyte antigen cross-match, or both. In KPD, the incompatibility problems with two donor recipient pairs can be solved by exchanging donors. In the absence of well-organized deceased donor program, or transplantation with desensitization protocol and ABO incompatible transplantation, living donor KPD promises hope to the growing number of patients suffering from end-stage renal disease in India. We report our first successful three-way KPD transplantation from India. In an era of organ shortage, this approach is relevant to encourage wider participation from KPD donors and transplant centers to prevent commercial transplantation.

Keywords

Kidney paired donation
living donor
renal transplantation
three-way

Introduction

Many potential kidney transplant recipients are unable to receive a live donor transplant due to cross-match or blood type incompatibility. Kidney paired donation (KPD) increases access to live donor transplantation.[1] From its first realization as an exchange of kidneys between two incompatible donor/recipient pairs, KPD has expanded to include compatible pairs, non-directed donors, three-way and larger exchanges, and living/deceased donor exchanges.[2]

Our center has been exploring KPD as a modality for facilitating living donor (LD) transplantation. In a single-center report (n = 70), we showed acceptable incidences of acute rejection, patient/graft survival rates over 10 years.[3] Here, we report our first successful three-way KPD transplantation resulting in transplantation of a highly sensitized patient and hard to match patient with AB donor.

Case Report

All potential donors and recipients were informed about risks and benefits of KPD prior to initiating evaluation. Sufficient time was given consider donation preferences, discuss options with their family and the donor evaluation team, and attenuate feelings of pressure or coercion if KPD is presented later. All three pairs of recipients and donors were allowed to meet each other before transplantation.

Patient profiles

Tables 1 and 2 describe the patient and donor profiles.

Table 1 Demographic and HLA data
Table 2 Immunological data 3 days prior to transplantation

Patient 1 was hard-to-match with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization and had positive anti-human globulin-enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross matches a value of 90% with the donor, her husband. She was hepatitis C virus positive so desensitization treatment was not considered. Patient 2 was hard-to-match due to AB donor and a recipient blood type combination. Patient 3 with B blood group was ABO incompatible with his healthy willing donor of A1 blood group.

Three way KPD was planned of patient 1 with donor 2, patient 2 with donor 3, and patient 3 with donor 1. All donors were subjected to a diethylenetriamine pentaaceticacid renal scan before transplantation and all displayed satisfactory glomerular filtration rate (>40 ml/min on each side). All three pairs of recipients were cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG positive.

Table 3 describes pre-transplantation and surgical data and outcome.

Table 3 Pre-transplantation and surgical data and outcome

Kidney transplantation

All surgeries were carried out on the same day by two transplant teams. All donors had single renal artery and single renal vein on the left side and underwent laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Immunosuppressive therapy constituted induction with methylprednisolone 500 mg for 3 days + rabbit-anti thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) (1.5 mg/kg single dose) along with calcineurin inhibitor based triple immunosuppression for maintenance therapy. Patient number 1 was hepatitis C virus positive so ATG induction was not given. Cold ischemia time was 2 h 30 s, 32 min and 44 min respectively for patient 1, 2 and 3. All patients received prophylaxis against CMV, fungal, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia infection.

All patients showed immediate graft function and normalization of serum creatinine. None of the patients had rejection and all had stable graft function on discharge and at 1month after transplantation.

Discussion

Live donation offers superior outcomes and is the most readily expandable source of kidneys for transplantation. ABO incompatibility and HLA sensitization represent the two greatest barriers to improving live donation rates. KPD offers a relatively low-cost option for subverting the incompatible barrier.[4]

KPD is feasible, successful, and if applied to larger donor pools, capable of expanding access to renal transplantation.[3] We have earlier shown similar graft and patient survival and rejection rates of KPD versus living related donor kidney transplantation LRDKTx over 2 years.[5]

Three-way KPDs were first reported in the USA in 2005. Simulations demonstrated that the match rates in KPD pools could be significantly improved by using the algorithms that allowed three-way donations. Three-way exchanges are more challenging either within or between institutions. This is because it is generally accepted that the donor operations should all be started simultaneously to reduce the chance that one of the transplants do esnotprogress (e.g. donor reneging).[5]

KPD can be carried out by any center that performs LD renal transplantation. Lack of awareness; counseling and participation in KPD may significantly disadvantage patients within compatible donors. Broader implementation of KPD across a wide number of centers has the potential to lead to more than 1000 additional live donor renal transplants every year.[6] It is cost effective, feasible, and crucial to properly serve transplant candidates with healthy but in compatible LD.[7] Recent study results are valuable for encouraging participation of KPD pairs and transplant centers in national KPD program.[8] In developing countries such as India, the costs of antibody removal protocols, and risk of infections in ABO incompatible renal transplantation make KPD program attractive.[89]

Future research should identify factors influencing donor and recipient willingness and preferences for entering KPD as compatible pairs and identify the perceived barriers to KPD participation among potential donors and recipients, and evaluate strategies for removing these barriers. Transplant centers should work together towards national KPD program and frame a uniform acceptable allocation policy.

Conclusion

Three-Way KPD is a valuable source of kidneys for renal transplantation. Encouraging the use of this approach to expand the donor pool would be important specially in low-income countries where deceased donor program is in infantile stage and transplantation with desensitization protocol and ABO incompatible transplantation are prohibitive due to economic constrains, risk of infections and lack of availability in all transplant centers.

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Single-center kidney paired donation: The Methodist San Antonio experience. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2125-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Living donor kidney exchange. Clin Transpl 2011:279-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Outcome of kidney paired donation transplantation to increase donor pool and to prevent commercial transplantation: A single-center experience from a developing country. Int Urol Nephrol 2012 Epub ahead of print
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Living donor exchange programs: Theory and practice. Br Med Bull. 2011;98:21-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Comparison of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantations with Living Related Donor Kidney Transplantation: Implications for National Kidney Paired Donation Program. Ren Fail 2013 Epub ahead of print
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Center-Level Utilization of Kidney Paired Donation. Am J Transplant 2013 Epub ahead of print
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Dynamic challenges inhibiting optimal adoption of kidney paired donation: Findings of a consensus conference. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:851-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Facilitators to national kidney paired donation program. Transpl Int 2013 Epub ahead of print
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Post-transplant infections: An ounce of prevention. Indian J Nephrol. 2010;20:171-8.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections