Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
34 (
1
); 31-36
doi:
10.4103/ijn.ijn_362_22

Multiple Facets of Multiple Myeloma in Kidney Biopsy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Department of Nephrology, Institute of Nephrourology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Department of Nephrology, Amrita Hospitals, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Department of Nephrology, Nizam’s Institute of Nephrology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Corresponding Author: Dr. Mythri Shankar, Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, Institute of Nephrourology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. E-mail: mythri.nish@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Shankar M, Anandh U, Guditi S. Multiple Facets of Multiple Myeloma in Kidney Biopsy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Indian J Nephrol 2024;34:31-6. doi: 10.4103/ijn.ijn_362_22

Abstract

Introduction:

Multiple myeloma is a type of plasma cell dyscrasia, which causes clonal proliferation of plasma cells and deposition in various organ systems. At presentation, 50% of patients with multiple myeloma have kidney dysfunction, which is considered a poor prognostic indicator. Data on the histopathological manifestations of multiple myeloma are sparse.

Objective:

To look at the kidney histopathological lesions in patients with the clinical diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of all kidney biopsies in patients with the clinical diagnosis of multiple myeloma was performed from June 1, 2020 to May 30, 2022, from three tertiary care nephrology referral centers.

Results:

A total of 61 patients with multiple myeloma and biopsy-proven kidney involvement were included in the study. The mean age at presentation was 55.39 ± 11.91 years, with male predominance (male to female ratio -1.6:1). The most common lesion on kidney biopsy was myeloma cast nephropathy (72.1%), followed by light chain deposition disease (21.3%) and AL amyloidosis (18%). About 26% of patients had dual lesions on kidney biopsy, 3% had three types of lesions on kidney biopsy In 48% of patients, the diagnosis of multiple myeloma was made only after the kidney biopsy.

Conclusion:

Patients with multiple myeloma and kidney involvement should be biopsied as the type of histopathological lesion influences the treatment options and prognosis.

Keywords

Kidney biopsy
kidney dysfunction
multiple myeloma

Introduction

In 1848, Dr. Bence Jones observed a “new substance” in the urine of a patient with “mollities ossium.”1 This was later termed as the Bence Jones protein, and an association of this new substance with plasma cell proliferation was established. The earliest disease state described with plasma cell proliferation is multiple myeloma (MM), which is defined as a clonal proliferation of plasma cells that produce monoclonal proteins that, in turn, cause organ damage. Fifty percent of patients with MM have kidney involvement at the time of presentation. The involvement of the kidney is associated with a poor prognosis and an increased mortality risk.2

The most common kidney lesions in MM are myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN), monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD), and AL amyloidosis.3 An autopsy study showed acute tubular necrosis in 34% of biopsies.4 There are very few studies on kidney involvement in multiple myeloma, all of them include fewer than 50 patients5-7, with the exception of two studies. Montseny et al.8 showed that MCN was the commonest (41%) histopathologocal lesion followed by AL amyloidosis (30%) and MIDD (19%). Another study from the Mayo Clinic3 also showed that MCN was the most common histopathological lesion (33%) followed by MIDD (22%), and AL amyloidosis (21%). In the past decade, we have witnessed an increase in the understanding of kidney lesions in MM, with the identification of newer lesions such as C3 glomerulopathy9. We report the histopathological lesions in patients with clinical diagnosis of MM.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at three tertiary care referral centers in India: the Institute of Nephro Urology, Bengaluru; Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad; and Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad. Kidney biopsies conducted at these three centers from June 1, 2020 to May 30, 2022 were reviewed.

Inclusion criteria: Biopsies with a clinical diagnosis of MM, made before or shortly after the kidney biopsy were included in the study. MM was defined as clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma and any one of the following myeloma-defining events10,11: serum calcium >11 mg/dl; serum creatinine >2 mg/; hemoglobin <10 g/dl; osteolytic lesions on skeletal survey radiography, computed tomography [CT, or positron emission tomography [PET-CT; serum-free light chain ratio >100, or more than one focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI.

All patients with a clinical diagnosis of MM and kidney dysfunction were biopsied. Indications for kidney biopsy were classified as syndromes: (1) acute kidney injury (AKI); (2) chronic kidney disease (CKD); (3) nephrotic syndrome (NS); and (4) rapidly progressive renal failure (RPRF). Demographic and clinical parameters of the patients were recorded.

Kidney biopsy samples were processed for light microscopy and immunofluorescence. Light microscopy specimens were stained using hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff (PAS), Masson’s trichrome, and Jones’ methenamine silver. Polyclonal antibodies to IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C1q, kappa, and lambda were stained for immunofluorescence.

Statistical methods

Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were carried out. Results on continuous measurements are presented as mean ± SD (min.–max.), and results on categorical measurements are presented as number and percentages (%). Significance was assessed at a 5% level of significance. Student’s t test (two-tailed, independent) was used to find the significance of study parameters on a continuous scale between two groups (intergroup analysis) on metric parameters. Levene’s test was performed to assess the homogeneity of variance. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test was used to find the significance of study parameters on a categorical scale between two or more groups in the non-parametric setting for qualitative data analysis. Fisher’s exact test is used when cell samples are very small.12,13 The IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 and R environment version 3.2.2 were used for the analysis of data. Microsoft Word and Excel were used to generate graphs, tables, etc.

Results

A total of 4263 kidney biopsy samples were reviewed, including 92 with a clinical diagnosis of MM. 31 samples did not have complete data; hence, 61 kidney biopsy samples were included in the study. The incidence of multiple myeloma–related kidney injury was 1.4%.

Population in the fifth and sixth decade of life were most commonly affected [Table 1], majority were males (62.3%). Hypertension was seen in 50.8% of patients, and diabetes mellitus in 14.8%. 70.5% of patients had a single lesion on kidney biopsy, 26.2% had dual lesions, and 3.3% had three lesions. The majority presented with AKI, followed by NS [Table 2]. A majority had proteinuria of >1 gm/24 hours (83.6%); two-thirds had a serum creatinine level >4 mg/dl. 93.4% had anemia and 26.2% had hypercalcemia at presentation. About one-third required kidney replacement therapy at presentation. Involvement of the heart was seen in 9.8% at presentation, and 4.9% had an infection at presentation. Among the histopathological lesions, the most common was MCN, followed by MIDD (light chain deposition disease [21.3%] and light and heavy chain deposition disease [3.3%], AL amyloidosis, C3 glomerulonephritis, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID), nodular sclerosis, plasma cell infiltration, and interstitial nephritis. [Figure 1, Tables 3 and 4].

Table 1: Comparison of clinical/biochemical assessment in relation to kidney replacement therapy of patients studied
Variables Requirement of kidney replacement therapy Total P
No Yes
Age in years 53.89±13.33 57.87±8.84 55.39±11.92 0.209
24-hour urine protein (grams) 3.58±2.27 3.88±3.46 3.7±2.76 0.687
Serum creatinine at presentation (mg/dl) 4.11±3.03 10.18±3.37 6.4±4.32 <0.001**
B urea (mg/dl) 89.39±57.82 158±60.49 115.26±67.28 <0.001**
Hemoglobin (gm%) 8.32±1.85 7.44±1.56 7.99±1.79 0.060+
Calcium (mg/dl) 9.29±1.31 9.62±3 9.41±2.1 0.553
Phosphorous (mg/dl) 4.74±1.43 6.01±1.36 5.22±1.52 <0.001**
Uric acid (mg/dl) 8.5±3 10.97±6.58 9.43±4.78 0.049*
Alkaline phosphates (U/L) 179.84±152.45 113.43±81.93 154.8±133.59 0.059+
Albumin (gm/L) 2.71±0.78 3.36±0.74 2.96±0.82 0.002**
Globulins (gm/L) 6.78±1.94 6.01±2.1 6.49±2.02 0.154
Cholesterol (mg/dl) 178.89±96.51 145.78±55.31 166.41±84.42 0.139
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 189.5±79.12 209.61±112.29 197.08±92.63 0.416
Right kidney size (cm) 10.33±1.05 10.09±1.03 10.24±1.04 0.379
Left kidney size (cm) 10.45±1.01 10.15±0.84 10.34±0.95 0.232

Legend: +Suggestive significance (P: 0.05<P<0.10), * Moderately significant (P: 0.01<P≤0.05), ** Strongly significant (P: P≤0.01)

Table 2: Nephrological syndrome-frequency distribution in relation to kidney replacement therapy of patients studied
Nephrological syndrome Requirement of kidney replacement therapy Total
No Yes
Acute kidney injury 16 (42.1%) 19 (82.6%) 35 (57.4%)
Nephrotic syndrome 12 (31.6%) 0 (0%) 12 (19.7%)
Rapidly progressive renal failure 5 (13.2%) 3 (13%) 8 (13.1%)
Chronic kidney disease 5 (13.2%) 1 (4.3%) 6 (9.8%)
Total 38 (100%) 23 (100%) 61 (100%)

P=0.002**, significant, Fisher’s exact test. Legend: +Suggestive significance (P: 0.05<P<0.10, * Moderately significant (P: 0.01<P≤0.05), ** Strongly significant (P: P≤0.01)

Spectrum of histopathology lesions in multiple myeloma. Image credit: Dr. Vinay. K. S.
Figure 1:
Spectrum of histopathology lesions in multiple myeloma. Image credit: Dr. Vinay. K. S.
Table 3: Spectrum of histopathological lesions in multiple myeloma
Variables Requirement of kidney replacement therapy Total P
No Yes
Light chain proximal tubulopathy
  No 35 (92.1%) 20 (87%) 55 (90.2%) 0.663
  Yes 3 (7.9%) 3 (13%) 6 (9.8%)
Light chain cast nephropathy
  No 17 (44.7%) 0 (0%) 17 (27.9%) <0.001**
  Yes 21 (55.3%) 23 (100%) 44 (72.1%)
AL amyloidosis
  No 27 (71.1%) 23 (100%) 50 (82%) 0.004**
  Yes 11 (28.9%) 0 (0%) 11 (18%)
Light chain deposit disease
  No 31 (81.6%) 17 (73.9%) 48 (78.7%) 0.529
  Yes 7 (18.4%) 6 (26.1%) 13 (21.3%)
Light and heavy chain deposit disease
  No 36 (94.7%) 23 (100%) 59 (96.7%) 0.522
  Yes 2 (5.3%) 0 (0%) 2 (3.3%)
C3Glomerulonephritis
  No 37 (97.4%) 22 (95.7%) 59 (96.7%) 1.000
  Yes 1 (2.6%) 1 (4.3%) 2 (3.3%)
  Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal 1 (2.6%) 1 (4.3%) 2 (3.3%)
  immunoglobulin deposits
  Nodular sclerosis 1 (2.6%) 1 (4.3%) 2 (3.3%)
Plasma cell infiltration
  No 37 (97.4%) 23 (100%) 60 (98.4%) 1.000
  Yes 1 (2.6%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.6%)
Interstitial nephritis
  No 37 (97.4%) 23 (100%) 60 (98.4%) 1.000
  Yes 1 (2.6%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.6%)
Total 38 (100%) 23 (100%) 61 (100%)

Legend: + Suggestive significance (P: 0.05<P<0.10, * Moderately significant (P: 0.01<P≤0.05), ** Strongly significant (P: P≤0.01)

Table 4: Light chain/heavy chain restriction in immunofluorescence
Light chain/heavy chain restriction No. of patients %
Kappa chain 32 52.45
Lambda chain 29 45.54
  IgG and K 5 8.1
  IgG and L 1 1.6
  IgA and K 1 1.6
  Kappa only 26 42.62
  Lambda only 27 44.26
Total 61 100.0

Among patients with low C3 (36.1%), the majority had light chain cast nephropathy (72.72%) followed by light chain deposition disease (31.8%), AL amyloidosis (13.63%), C3 glomerulopathy (9.09%), light and heavy chain deposition disease (9.09%), and light chain proximal tubulopathy (9.09%). Dual lesions were significantly associated with low C3.

In this series, the primary diagnosis of MM was made on kidney biopsy in 47.54% of patients. These patients were biopsied for their renal indications, and the diagnosis of MM was not clinically considered before the biopsy.

Among the biochemical parameters, high serum creatinine, uremia, phosphorous, hyperuricemia, anemia, hypoalbuminemia; AKI and RPRF; presence of MCN and higher levels of involved free light chains were significantly associated with the requirement of kidney replacement therapy (KRT).

Discussion

About half of all patients with multiple myeloma present with kidney dysfunction14, in concordance with this study. Also, the incidence of myeloma-related pathology among all the kidney biopsies performed was found to be 1.4%. Most patients were males in their sixth and seventh decades of life. This is consistent with previous studies.1518 Hypertension is seen in patients with kidney involvement, especially in MCN and light chain deposition disease (LCDD).19 The presence of anemia, hypercalcemia, and hyperuricemia, was consistent with a study by Sakhuja et al.16 However, there was no association between creatinine levels and histopathological severity of the disease. Higher creatinine levels presented as AKI and RPRF, and patients with AL amyloidosis presented with NS and normal creatinine levels. This study had a majority of samples with trace and/or 1+ proteinuria on dipstick (60.7%), and the mean 24-hour proteinuria was 3.7 ± 2.76 g, while Nasr et al.3 reported mean proteinuria of 2.5 g.As India is a developing country, patient’s presentation to a tertiary care center is delayed due to lack of awareness and poor socioeconomic status.

The most common indication for kidney biopsy was non-recovering AKI which was similar to previous studies.3,18,19,20

Among patients with low C3, majority had MCN followed byLCDD, AL amyloidosis, and C3 glomerulopathy. Dual lesions were significantly associated with low C3. Zand et al.21 proposed the hypothesis that abnormal monoclonal immunoglobulins dysregulated the complement system leading to low C3 levels22.

Patients who presented with renal symptoms prior to the diagnosis of MM had significantly more anemia and hypercalcemia than those already diagnosed with MM who presented with predominantly bony pain and fracture. However, there was no significant difference in the type of histopathological lesion between the two groups. This was in accordance with previous studies.16,17,23

The kidney injury pattern depends on the immunoglobulin’s physicochemical properties and host factors.24 Similar to previous studies,3,1618,25 MCN was also the most common lesion in this study and was characterized by fractured casts in the tubules along with giant cell reaction. Sanders et al.26 studied 36 patients across the spectrum of paraproteinemia and found AL amyloidosis as the most common lesion. In contrast, this study showed that MIDD was slightly more common than AL amyloidosis, similar to the study by Nasr et al.3 This study included established cases of MM leading to selection bias, as bone marrow plasma cells <10% were not included. There is also a possibility that the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis might have already been established by fat pad biopsy or tongue biopsy, and hence, kidney biopsy might have been deferred. Proliferative glomerulonephritis was seen in four patients. Two of these had dominant C3 deposits on immunofluorescence and were thus diagnosed as C3 glomerulonephritis; the remaining two cases had lambda light chain restriction, thereby confirming PGNMID.27

Not all kidney biopsy lesions of MIDD, AL amyloidosis, and C3 glomerulopathy are mutually exclusive; about 30% had more than one lesion. Similar to previous studies,3,28 proximal light chain tubulopathy was uncommon. This might not be completely represented because we included patients who had been diagnosed with MM. Proximal light chain tubulopathy precedes the development of MM by months and years and might have been missed.

The pathological lesions demonstrated from this study were diverse and heterogeneous.3,26,16,17 This could be due to the small number of cases studied previously and newer lesions such as C3 glomerulopathy being identified only during the last decade. Published studies are more than a decade old. Additionally, the studies from the Indian population are more than two decades old.16,17

Among the biochemical parameters, high serum creatinine, uremia, phosphorous, hyperuricemia, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia were significantly associated with the requirement for KRT. This is indicative of a hypercatabolic state. This was consistent with a study by Knudsen et al.29 This study showed that high levels of free light chain were associated with increased kidney dysfunction, similar to results of Yadav et al.,30 irrespective of the involved paraprotein. The secreted free light chains are very high in quantity and nephrotoxic. The proximal tubular cells are unable to reabsorb the excess amount of filtered free light chains, thereby leading to kidney injury.31 Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) was positive for M spike in 86.9% of patients. There was no association found between SPEP positivity and kidney histology.

Among the histological lesions, the presence of MCN was significantly associated with the requirement of KRT. In contrast to this, patients with AL amyloidosis did not require KRT. These findings were similar to previous studies.32,33

EM is essential to identify the deposits of paraprotein, but it was not done due to financial constraints. As the patients were referred to the department of medical oncology for further management there was lack of data on treatment modalities and outcome.

Conclusion

This multicentric study shows a diverse and heterogenous spectrum of kidney lesions in MM. Kidney biopsy is essential to identify kidney lesions with important prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the Director and Dean, Head of the department, residents and faculty, Nephropathologists and patients of the three centers - Institute of Nephro-urology, Bengaluru, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad and Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. . On a new substance occurring in the urine of a patient with “mollitiesossium”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1848;138:55-62.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Diagnosis and treatment of kidney involvement in plasma cell diseases: Renal involvement in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathies. Internist. 2019;60:10-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Clinicopathologic correlations in multiple myeloma: A case series of 190 patients with kidney biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59:786-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Renal pathologic spectrum in an autopsy series of patients with plasma cell dyscrasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:875-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Renal lesions in multiple myeloma: Their relationship to associated protein abnormalities. Am J Kidney Dis. 1983;2:423-38.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Renal histological lesions and clinical syndromes in multiple myeloma. Renal Immunopathology Group. Clin Nephrol. 1987;27:222-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Multiple myeloma and severe renal failure: A clinicopathologic study of outcome and prognosis in 34 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1987;66:126-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Long-term outcome according to renal histological lesions in 118 patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:1438-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Dysproteinemia and the kidney: Core Curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74:822-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Multiple myeloma: Diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95:373-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538-48.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Fundamentals of Biostatistics In: Duxbury (5th ed). . p. :80-240.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . Statistics in Medicine In: Academic Press (2nd ed). . p. :85-125.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1978 through 1990, with a review of the trend since 1945. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1577-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Rapidly changing myeloma epidemiology in the general population: Increased incidence, older patients, and longer survival. Eur J Haematol. 2018;101:237-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Renal involvement in multiple myeloma: A 10-year study. Ren Fail. 2000;22:465-77.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Renal disease is a prodrome of multiple myeloma: An analysis of 50 patients from eastern India. Ren Fail. 2009;31:267-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Wybrane powiklania nerkowe w przebiegu szpiczaka mnogiego [Selected renal complications during the course of multiple myeloma] Przegl Lek. 1997;54:835-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Acute kidney injury in patients receiving systemic treatment for cancer: A population-based cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:727-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Multiple myeloma--presenting as acute kidney injury. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:23-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. C3 glomerulonephritis associated with monoclonal gammopathy: A case series. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62:506-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . C3 glomerulonephritis in multiple myeloma: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4843.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2008;22:1485-93.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1931-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Renal disease in multiple myeloma. Nihon Rinsho. 2007;65:2229-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Spectrum of glomerular and tubulointerstitial renal lesions associated with monotypical immunoglobulin light chain deposition. Lab Invest. 1991;64:527-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits: A distinct entity mimicking immune-complex glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2004;65:85-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Proximal renal tubular function in myelomatosis: Ob-servations in the fourth medical research council trial. J Clin. 1984;37:852-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , . Renal function in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A demographic study of 1353 patients. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 1994;53:207-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Serum free light chain levels and renal function at diagnosis in patients with multiple myeloma. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:178. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0962-x
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Serum free light chain measurement aids the diagnosis of myeloma in patients with severe renal failure. BMC Nephrol. 2008;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-9-11
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Prognostic factors and effectiveness of treatment in acute renal failure due to multiple myeloma: A review of 50 cases. Report of the Italien Renal Immunopathology Group. Clin Nephrol. 1987;28:1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , . Reversible renal insufficiency in multiple myeloma. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:2083-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections