Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Commentary : Patient’s Voice
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor – Authors’ reply
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
33 (
6
); 456-458
doi:
10.4103/ijn.ijn_205_22

Nocardiosis in Renal Transplantation: Case Series from India

Department of Nephrology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Vaibhav Tiwari, Department of Nephrology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi - 110 060, India. E-mail: drvt87@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Nocardiosis is a rare opportunistic infection seen in kidney transplant patients and is caused by aerobic actinomycete. Disease manifestations can vary from a localized infection to multisystem organ failure. In this retrospective case series, we present 16 cases of Nocardiosis. The median age of the patients was 44 years. The median time from transplant to nocardiosis was 21 months. Acute rejection episodes and CMV infection within 6 months of nocardiosis were found in 12.5% and 25%, respectively. The most common organ involvement was the lungs (75%), followed by the brain (12.5%). Only one patient showed cutaneous involvement (6.25%). Mean creatinine at presentation was 0.7 mg/dL (mean eGFR: 92 ± 27 mL/min/1.73 m2). Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance was found in 25% of patients. Five patients (31.25%) succumbed to the infection. Nocardiosis has a very low incidence but a high rate of mortality.

Keywords

Infection
Nocardia
transplantation

Introduction

Nocardiosis is a rare opportunistic infection seen in immunocompromised patients, such as kidney transplant patients. It is ubiquitous in the environment, including in soil and organic matter. It is a slow-growing organism, thus causing delayed diagnosis and treatment. The clinical syndrome can vary and can affect the lungs, central nervous system (CNS), cutaneous tissues and can be disseminated, causing multi-organ failure. Lungs are the most commonly involved organs in immunosuppressed patients. Primary skin involvement (cutaneous nocardiosis) is more commonly seen in immunocompetent patients.[1] Disseminated and cerebral cases have a poor prognosis.[2] Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is given as prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients.[3] The mortality associated with nocardiosis in renal allograft recipients is 25%, but it increases by >2-fold in patients with CNS involvement.[4] Despite such high mortality, there are limited data on nocardiosis in kidney transplant patients because of the following factors: unfamiliarity with the disease, causing difficulty in diagnosis; nonspecific clinical presentation; and the presence of coinfections that preclude further workup for nocardiosis. Thus, we present a case series evaluating the clinical course, treatment response, and patient and graft outcomes in kidney transplant patients affected with nocardiosis.

Case Series

A total of 1801 kidney transplants were done from 2010 to 2019. Sixteen cases of nocardiosis were identified. Baseline features of patients are shown in Table 1. The most common clinical presentation was fever with cough (75%), with a mean duration of symptoms before admission of 6 ± 3 days. Other rare presentations included headache (25%), vomiting (19%), and skin lesions (6%). A history of CMV infection 6 ± 1.2 months prior to nocardiosis was found in 25% of patients. Two patients (12.5%) had a history of acute cellular rejection 3 and 2 months prior to Nocardia infection, respectively, which was treated with steroid pulse (total: 1.5 g) followed by an increase in the dose of immunosuppressive drugs. All patients had stable kidney function (creatinine <1 mg/dL).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients
Variable Result
Age in years (Median, IQR) 44, 39.75-56.25
Gender (Male/Female) 14/2
Diabetes, n (%) 3 (18.75%)
Hypertension (n, %) 16, 100%
RAR duration in months (Median, IQR) 21, 9.75-45
H/O rejection before 6 months of infection (n, %) 2, 12.5
H/O CMV infection before 6 months of infection (n, %) 4, 25
Mean creatinine at presentation (mg/dL) 0.7
Mean eGFR at presentation 92±27 mL/min/1.73 m2
Induction IS:
 Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (n, %) 15, 93.75
 ATG-Fresenius (n, %) 1, 6.25
 Dose of ATG 3 mg/kg
Maintenance IS:
 Tacrolimus (n, %) 16, 100
 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n, %) 16, 100
 Prednisolone (n, %) 16, 100
 Prednisolone dose (mg/dL), mean 5
 Tacrolimus levels (ng/mL), mean 5.08
 MMF dose (mg/dL), mean 1500
 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis 9, 56.25

The most common organ involvement was the lungs (75%), followed by the brain (12.5%). Only one patient showed cutaneous involvement (6.25%) [Table 2]. The severe form of the disease in the form of disseminated infection was seen in one patient. Subspecies identification was possible in the last 3 years of study after the introduction of MALDI TOF. Six patients were diagnosed with nocardiosis from 2017 to 2019, of which Nocardia farcinica was the most common type (4/6 patients) and was resistant to TMP-SMX. Patients were treated as per the sensitivity report with intravenous antibiotics initially followed by oral antibiotics. The lead time from the first appearance of symptoms till the start of the therapy was 12 ± 4 days. The mortality rate was 31.25%. Patients with brain involvement and disseminated infection had 100% mortality.

Table 2 Site of involvement, species, drug sensitivity, and outcomes of patients with nocardiosis
Drug Sensitivity Outcome
Organ involved Species TMP-SMX Linezolid Imipenem Amikacin
1 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Recovered
2 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Recovered
3 Cutaneous Nocardia S S S S Recovered
4 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Death
5 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Recovered
6 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Recovered
7 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Death
8 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Recovered
9 Lungs Nocardia S S S S Recovered
10 Brain Nocardia S S S S Death
11 Lungs Nocardia farcinica R - S S Recovered
12 Brain Nocardia farcinica R - S S Death
13 Disseminated Nocardia farcinica R - S S Death
14 Lungs Nocardia cyrigeorgica S - S S Recovered
15 Lungs Nocardia farcinica R S S S Recovered
16 Lungs Nocardia wallacei S - R R Recovered

TMP-SMX: Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, R: Resistant, S: Sensitive

Discussion

Nocardiosis is a rare infection that is caused by the Nocardia genus. Nocardia is gram-variable and weakly acid-fast bacilli in various suboptimal growth conditions. It may appear gram-negative and acid-fast-stain-negative with a longer incubation period for growth. Thus, a strong suspicion is needed for diagnosis.[2] The incidence of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients ranges from 0.6% to 2.65%.[5,6] Among SOT recipients, the highest incidence of nocardiosis is found in lung transplant patients.[6] The incidence of nocardiosis in kidney transplant patients varies from 0.7% to 2.6%.[7,8] Lungs are the most commonly involved organ in nocardiosis, as was found in our cases.[9]

Species identification is important as it guides treatment. After the introduction of MALDI-TOF at our center, six patients were diagnosed with nocardiosis, of which four were infected with Nocardia farcinica, one patient with Nocardia wallacei, and one with Nocardia cyrigeorgica. Nocardia farcinica is the most predominant species isolated in SOT patients;[6,10] similar findings were noted in our case series after the introduction of subspecies identification. Nocardia farcinica caused all pulmonary, disseminated, and brain infections. Nocardia farcinica was resistant to TMP-SMX, which used to be first-line therapy against nocardiosis before subspecies identification and sensitivity testing.

Immunosuppressive agents decrease both cellular and humoral immunity, thereby increasing the risk for nocardiosis. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) inhibit IL-2 production, thereby inhibiting T cell proliferation and cellular immunity. In addition, B cell immunity is indirectly affected due to impaired T cell functions.[11] Steroids affect both innate and adaptive immunity.[12] All of our patients were on steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Moreover, all our patients had received an induction agent with ATG or ATG-Fresenius. Thus, intense immunosuppression increases the risk of opportunistic infection.

TMP-SMX prophylaxis has been in use in our center in most kidney transplant patients. Nine out of 16 patients had received TMP-SMX prophylaxis for 6 months. However, contrary to routine practice, some reports have suggested that TMP-SMX may not protect against nocardiosis.[10,13] Such association could not be analyzed in view of small sample size. However, nocardiosis did not occur when our patients were on TMP-SMX prophylaxis.

Association between CMV disease and nocardiosis is variable. CMV is an independent risk factor for nocardiosis,[14] and similar findings were found by Kürşat S et al.[9] and Peleg et al.,[13] while CMV viremia was not found as an independent risk factor for nocardia by Coussement et al.[10] In our case series, four patients had CMV infection within 6 months prior to nocardiosis. The treatment of choice for nocardiosis is TMP-SMX. It can be used in combination with the following drugs: imipenem, meropenem, linezolid, amikacin, fluoroquinolones, and minocycline.[15,16] Ideally, treatment should be based on a culture sensitivity report and using a combination of drugs for systemic illness.[4] Seven patients received a combination of imipenem and linezolid, five patients received a combination of imipenem and amikacin, and four patients received TMP-SMX alone.

Mortality was seen in five patients (31.25%), while 68.75% of patients recovered. Cerebral nocardiosis has a poor prognosis and is associated with increased mortality.[2] Similar findings were found in our case, with 100% mortality in cerebral nocardiosis.

Conclusion

Nocardiosis in kidney transplant patients has a very low incidence but is an important cause of mortality. Nocardia farcinica is the predominant species resistant to TMP-SMX. Cerebral and disseminated nocardiosis has a poor prognosis. Drug sensitivity is an important tool to guide treatment.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , . Nocardiosis:Updated clinical review and experience at a tertiary center. Infect Infection. 2010;38:89-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Disseminated nocardiosis in renal transplant recipient under therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis:A case report. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:1-7. doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2408-0
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Effectiveness of low-dose contrimoxazole prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia after renal and/or pancreas transplantation. Transpl Int. 1992;5:81-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Successful treatment of disseminated nocardiosis in a renal transplant recipient. Med J Armed Forces India. 2013;69:297-300.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Post renal transplant pulmonary nocardiosis-A case report. J Dr NTR Univ Heal Sci. 2019;8:147.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . A 20-year experience with nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in the Southwestern United States:A single-center study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20:e12904.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Nocardial infection in immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38:168-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Nocardiosis at the turn of the century. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88:250-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Nocardiosis in renal transplant patients. Nephron. 1997;75:370-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Nocardia infection in solid organ transplant recipients:A multicenter european case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:338-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Mode of action of tacrolimus (fk506):Molecular and cellular mechanisms. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17:584-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Corticosteroids-mechanisms of action in health and disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016;42:15.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcome of Nocardia infection in organ transplant recipients:A matched case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:1307-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Case report:Disseminated Nocardia infection in a renal transplant patient:The pitfalls of diagnosis and management. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013 doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-007276
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Nocardial brain abscess in a renal transplant recipient successfully treated with triple antimicrobials. Clin Nephrol. 1998;50:128-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Nocardiosis in patients of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura on steroids. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:591-3.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections