Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Allied Health Professionals’ Corner
Author Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Case Report
Clinicopathological Conference
Commentary
Corrigendum
Editorial
Editorial – World Kidney Day 2016
Editorial Commentary
Erratum
Foreward
Guideline
Guidelines
Image in Nephrology
Images in Nephrology
In-depth Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Literature Review
Nephrology in India
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Research Letter
Retraction Notice
Review
Review Article
Short Review
Special Article
Special Feature
Special Feature - World Kidney Day
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Varia
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
27 (
4
); 316-318
doi:
10.4103/0971-4065.202839

Primary Renal Echinococcosis

Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College and Super Speciality Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Vishal V. Ramteke, Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College, Super Speciality Hospital, Nagpur - 440 003, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: vvramteke@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Echinococcosis is a parasitic infection caused by the larval stage of a cestode Echinococcus granulosus and is endemic in sheep farming regions of developing countries. It manifests as hydatid cyst and most commonly is found in liver followed by lungs. Renal hydatid cyst is rare and amounts for 2% of all cases. There are no specific clinical manifestations, and hence diagnosis of renal hydatid disease is missed out easily without imaging. We report a case of 50-year-old female who had 6 months history of lower abdominal pain with hematuria, found to have right renal hydatid cyst on imaging which was treated with right nephrectomy with pre- and post-operative albendazole treatment.

Keywords

Albendazole
echinococcosis
hydatid cyst
percutaneous aspiration

Introduction

Echinococcosis or hydatid disease is a zoonotic parasitic disease caused by larval stage of cestode Echinococcus granulosus. It is endemic in sheep rearing areas with high prevalence in China, Central Asia, the Middle East, Eastern Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Alaska, and some parts of South America.[12] Dog is the definitive hosts while sheep is the usual intermediate host. Humans are accidental intermediate dead end hosts infected through ingestion of parasite eggs in contaminated food, water or soil, or through direct contact with animal hosts. After gaining entry in gut the parasite larva penetrates the duodenal mucosa, reaches the blood stream, and seeds the liver and lungs commonly. The cysts are most commonly located in liver (75%) followed by lungs (15%). Primary or isolated involvement of kidneys is rare and accounts for 1%–5% of all hydatid disease in humans.[34] Most patients with primary involvement of kidney remain asymptomatic for years altogether. In those symptomatic, they are nonspecific and subtle, such as low backache (40%) and upper abdominal discomfort (20%).[2] The only definitive diagnostic sign is the presence of daughter vesicles in the urine seen in 10% cases.[5] The treatment is surgical as simple aspiration is associated with very high recurrence rates (90%).[6] Total or partial nephrectomy is recommended with cyst rupture into the collecting system or outside and infection.

Case Report

A 50-year-old female reported to nephrology outpatient department with complaints of the right upper abdominal discomfort of 6 months duration. The pain was dull aching type with no radiation elsewhere. There was a history of intermittent hematuria with the abdominal discomfort. There was no history of colicky abdominal pain, lithuria, weight loss, anorexia, or jaundice in the past. She was postmenopausal with none significant medical or surgical history. She hailed from a remote village in central India and was sheep rearer by occupation. She consumed mixed diet and belonged to low socioeconomic strata. General examination revealed palor while on abdominal examination right kidney was palpable with bosselated surface and was nontender. There was no renal angle tenderness or hepatosplenomegaly.

Complete hemogram showed anemia (hemoglobin - 6.5 g/dl) with normal leucocyte and platelet count. Her renal and liver function test was normal. An ultrasound examination of abdomen and pelvis showed a multiloculated cystic lesion of size 6 cm × 7 cm × 13 cm size with daughter cysts in the right kidney. Other viscera were found to be normal. The patient was hospitalized and transfused two units of blood. After adequate hydration, she was subjected to contrast-enhanced computed tomography of abdomen. It showed a well-defined multilocular peripherally enhancing cystic lesion with mixed internal attenuation and peripherally arranged daughter cysts and curvilinear calcification [Figure 1]. The cystic lesion replaced almost entire right kidney causing enlargement and architectural distortion measuring 5.5 cm × 7 cm × 13.5 cm with no contrast excretion. Rest of the examination was normal. Serology was not done due to nonavailability at our center. A final diagnosis of primary right renal hydatid cyst was arrived at.

Axial contrast computed tomography image showing right kidney with a well-defined multilocular peripherally enhancing cystic lesion with mixed internal attenuation and peripherally arranged daughter cysts and curvilinear calcification
Figure 1
Axial contrast computed tomography image showing right kidney with a well-defined multilocular peripherally enhancing cystic lesion with mixed internal attenuation and peripherally arranged daughter cysts and curvilinear calcification

The patient was started on tablet albendazole 10 mg/kg/day in two divided doses with fatty meal and hematinics. Urology consultation was sought, and the patient was explained about the need of right total nephrectomy in view of nonfunctioning right kidney. The patient was discharged and later admitted after 4 weeks of oral albendazole therapy. Extraperitoneal right nephrectomy was performed. Specimen showed a large thick walled cyst with numerous daughters’ cysts in the kidney [Figure 2]. Gross examination of the nephrectomy specimen showed chalky white external surface of kidney with distorted calyces. Multiple cystic cavities with attached cyst wall were noted. Multiple pearly white tissues contained gelatinous material suggestive of hydatid cysts.

Right total nephrectomy cut section after removal of daughter cyst and complete loss of renal parenchymal architecture
Figure 2
Right total nephrectomy cut section after removal of daughter cyst and complete loss of renal parenchymal architecture

Histopathologic examination showed sclerosed glomeruli, thyroidization of tubules and thickened arterioles. There was marked chronic inflammatory infiltrate in the interstitium including eosinophils, lymphocytes, and giant cells. Cysts specimens showed scolices with hooklets and thus final diagnosis of hydatid cyst with chronic pyelonephritis was arrived. The patient was discharged on day 5 after an uneventful postoperative course. Oral albendazole was continued for another 4 weeks on discharge. The patient is on regular follow-up in outpatient department in health and normal renal function test.

Discussion

Primary renal hydatid cyst is caused by ingestion of the parasite eggs in contaminated food, water or soil, or through direct contact with animal hosts. It crosses duodenal mucosa invasion, and renal cyst is due to hematogenous spread. Our patient was a sheep herder and was in direct contact with sheep and dogs. Renal hydatid is rare compared to liver and lung hydatid cyst and is a challenging condition to diagnose owing to the absence of specific signs or symptoms. Presenting symptoms are variable, and the most common symptoms are palpable mass, flank pain, hematuria, passing of pearly structure in urine, malaise, and fever.[37] Our patient had a history of vague abdominal discomfort with intermittent hematuria.

Serology is less helpful in diagnosis due to high false negative results but is a useful epidemiological tool to monitor transmission and initiate control measures.[8] Imaging plays the key role in diagnosing and staging of renal hydatid cyst. Ultrasound is the most essential tool for diagnosis of hydatid disease demonstrating floating membranes, daughter cysts, and hydatid sand seen in pure cystic lesions. The WHO/IWG-E – 2010 classification system for cystic echinococcosis (CE) diagnosis and treatment is based on ultrasound imaging and classifies hydatid cysts as stage active (CL, CE1, CE2), transitional (CE3a, CE3b), and inactive (CE4, or CE5).[910] Computed tomogram is superior to other imaging modalities in being more sensitive in observing daughter cysts, minute calcifications, intracystic gas, and in anatomical localization preoperatively.

The treatment of hydatid cyst of the kidney is based on the WHO/IWG-E – 2010 classification system for CE. Active and transitional lesions need surgical intervention/percutaneous aspiration injection and reaspiration (PAIR) + medical management due high infectivity and risk of spread. Inactive lesions needs monitoring.[10] PAIR has high failure rates and risk of peritoneal seeding and hence avoided. Surgical modality includes extraperitoneal and laparoscopic partial or total nephrectomy. Laparoscopic nephrectomy entails risk of cyst rupture, dissemination, and incomplete removal of the hydatid cyst.[11] Extraperitoneal nephrectomy is favored which is devoid of above risks. It is preceded by cystectomy where first the cyst is punctured; content aspirated then filled with scolicidal like hydrogen peroxide or 10% povidone-iodine for 5 min. This maneuver reduces the internal pressure of the cyst, sterilizes the content, and allows next step of controlled opening of the cyst and its controlled evacuation with a spoon and germinate membrane removal.

Complete nephrectomy is reserved for destroyed nonfunctioning kidneys, opening into the draining system or other cavities and complicated by renal infection. Medical management is recommended with bi-imidazoles like albendazole (10–15 mg/kg/day in two divided doses) or mebendazole (40 mg/kg/day in three divided doses) in combination with PAIR procedure in inoperable cases. Preoperative three cycles bi-imidazoles of 4 weeks duration 2 weeks apart makes the cysts less tense preventing spillage and anaphylaxis. Postnephrectomy 3 months course of albendazole can prevent recurrences.[12]

Conclusion

Primary renal echinococcosis or hydatid cyst is rare and can be easily missed out due to nonspecific manifestations. A low threshold of using ultrasound in centers catering high-risk group prone for echinococcosis is desired for early diagnosis. Surgical management with pre- and post-operative bi-imidazolines has good outcomes with lesser recurrence rates.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , . Isolated renal hydatidosis: Experience with 20 cases. J Urol. 2003;169:186-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Diagnosis and surgical treatment of renal hydatid disease: A retrospective analysis of 30 cases. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96602.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Hydatid cyst of the kidney: A report of147 controlled cases. Eur Urol. 2000;33:461-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Hydatid cyst of the kidney: Diagnosis and treatment. World J Surg. 2001;25:68-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Multiple disseminated abdominal hydatidosis presenting with gross hydatiduria: A rare case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2009;52:213-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Percutaneous injection sclerotherapy with minocycline hydrochloride for simple renal cysts. Int Urol Nephrol. 1993;25:37-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Ourexperience in eight case with urinary hydatid disease: A series of 327 cases held in nine different clinics. Int J Urol. 2006;13:1162-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Serological prevalence of echinococcosis and risk factors for infection among children in rural communities of Southern Ningxia, China. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:1086-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. WHO Informal Working Group. International classification of ultrasound images in cystic echinococcosis for application in clinical and field epidemiological settings. Acta Trop. 2003;85:253-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in humans. Acta Trop. 2010;114:1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Case report: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for isolated renal hydatid disease. J Endourol. 2006;20:24-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Clinical management of cystic echinococcosis: State of the art, problems, and perspectives. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:301-11.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections